Search for any green Service

Find green products from around the world in one place

Government announces biofuel mandate for transport sector

Government announces biofuel mandate for transport sector

The Government has announced it will mandate the use of biofuels for cars, trucks, trains and ships to reduce emissions in the transport sector.

Energy and Resources Minister Megan Woods announced on Wednesday a Sustainable Biofuels Mandate will take effect from April 1, 2023.

“Biofuels offer a practical, low-emissions solution to reduce New Zealand’s transport sector emissions and will be scaled up over time resulting in greater emissions reductions from transport fuels,” Woods said.

Fuel wholesalers – those who first import or refine fuels – must cut their total greenhouse gas emissions for transport fuels they sell by 1.2 per cent in 2023, then 2.4 per cent in 2024, and then 3.5 per cent in 2025, by replacing part of their supply with biofuels.

 

Biofuels will offer a practical, low-emissions solution to reduce New Zealand’s transport sector emissions and will be scaled up over time. (File photo)

 

“Land transport accounts for almost half of all of our national carbon dioxide emissions and we need to take action to start to mitigate transport’s impact on climate change,” Woods said.

She predicted the mandate would prevent around one million tonnes of emissions over the next three years.

“Biofuels mandates are common overseas with more than 60 jurisdictions having them; we had one on the cards more than a decade ago but it was repealed before it came into effect,” Woods said.

Transport Minister Michael Wood said that would reduce emissions from the transport sector emissions while the rest of the Clean Car Package “revs up”. This includes rebates for electric vehicles, more chargers along state highways, and a push to import more climate-friendly cars.

“We need to transition to low-emission vehicles, and biofuels will help reduce emissions while we make that transition,” he said. “Biofuels have the potential to boost economic recovery through encouraging a local industry and creating jobs.”

 

A separate mandate for aviation will be announced in 2022. (File photo) RICKY WILSON/STUFF

 

A separate mandate for aviation fuel would be developed next year; The Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) was working with Air New Zealand on a study to determine the potential for producing sustainable aviation fuel domestically.

Statistics NZ data shows domestic aviation greenhouse emissions in 2018 were up 12 per cent from 2017, and up 17.7 percent from 1990. They made up 3.2 per cent of all carbon dioxide emissions in 2018.

However, there are concerns the mandate will hike the price of fuel. An MBIE report from June says: “A biofuels mandate will, however, increase fuel prices as biofuels cost more to produce.”

“If the Sustainable Biofuels Mandate is implemented as proposed, in 2025 it would result in a 0.2 per cent (0.4 cents per litre) increase in baseline petrol prices, a 5.8 percent (7.1 cents per litre) increase in baseline diesel prices.”

Minister Woods has been approached for comment.

 


 

Source Stuff

This ‘liquid tree’ in Belgrade is fighting back against air pollution

This ‘liquid tree’ in Belgrade is fighting back against air pollution

Belgrade has an innovative tool in the fight against dirty air – this so-called “liquid tree”.

It’s Serbia’s first urban photo-bioreactor, a solution for tackling greenhouse gas emissions and improving air quality.

It contains six hundred litres of water and uses microalgae to bind carbon dioxide and produce pure oxygen through photosynthesis.

“The microalgae replaces two, 10-year-old trees or 200 square metres of lawn,” said Dr Ivan Spasojevic, one of the authors of the project from the Institute for Multidisciplinary Research at the University of Belgrade.

“The system is the same because both trees and grass perform photosynthesis and bind carbon dioxide.

“The advantage of microalgae is that they are 10 to 50 times more efficient than trees.

“Our goal is not to replace forests but to use this system to fill those urban pockets where there is no space for planting trees.”

 

 

Belgrade is the fourth most polluted city in Serbia, due to the two large coal power plants nearby.

The two plants are among the top 10 dirtiest plants in Europe, according to the European NGO Health and Environment Alliance (HEAL).

In 2019, Serbia ranked as Europe’s fifth most polluted country with an average PM 2.5 in air pollution, according to the IQAir’s World Air Quality Report.

Another report in December 2019 also put the country under increased scrutiny, as scientists claimed Serbia had Europe’s worst per capita record for pollution-related deaths: 175 per 100,000 people.

Activists have also claimed that pollution in Serbia and in other parts of the Balkan peninsula is so bad that it can be seen, smelt and even tasted, especially during autumn and winter.

 


 

Source Euronews.green

Google to help fashion brands map ESG supply chain risks

Google to help fashion brands map ESG supply chain risks

Consumers are demanding more transparency about where their clothes are produced and under what conditions. With the average supply chain for a merino sweater spanning 28,000 kilometres, fashion brands have the colossal task of tracing a product’s history from field to shelf in a bid to clean-up the sector’s spotty environmental, social and governance (ESG) record.

In partnership with conservation group World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), fashion label Stella McCartney and non-profit The Textile Exchange, the search giant has developed the Google Impact Fibre Explorer, that it says will enable companies to identify the biggest risks associated with more than 20 fibre types in their supply chains, including synthetics.

Despite sustainability pledges, the fashion industry is failing to tackle its hefty carbon and environmental footprint and is on a trajectory that will far-exceed the pathway to mitigate climate change to align with the United Nation’s goal of keeping global temperatures from rising above 1.5°C since pre-industrial times, according to research by McKinsey, a consultancy.

The fashion industry is one of the largest contributors to the global climate and ecological crisis — accounting for up to 8 per cent of global greenhouse gas emissions.

A large chunk of emissions could be avoided in its upstream operations with approximately 70 per cent of the industry’s greenhouse gas emissions stem from energy-intensive raw material production.

 

The Global Fibre Impact Explorer (GFIE) dashboard allows brands to upload their fibre portfolio data and get recommendations to reduce risk across key environmental categories. Image: The Keyword, Google

 

Environmental factors such as air pollution, biodiversity, climate and greenhouse gasses, forestry and water use are calculated to produce risk ratings. The tool will also provide brands with recommendations for targeted and regionally specific risk reduction activities including opportunities to work with farmers, producers and communities.

During a pilot phase, British fashion house Stella McCartney was able to identify cotton sources in Turkey that are facing water stress.

Brands such as Chanel, Nike and H&M are among the 130 companies that have pledged to halve their greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 under the renewed United Nations Fashion Charter announced last month during climate talks in Glasgow. Alongside updated commitments to cut emissions, the charter promises to reduce the environmental impact from the use of materials such as cotton, viscose, polyester, wool and leather.

The renewed agreement is more ambitious than a previous commitment in 2018 to cut emissions by a third. Nevertheless, the signatories represent a slither of the vast garment and footwear industry with fast-fashion brands such as BooHoo, Shein and ASOS notably missing from list.

The textiles sector also called for policy change to incentivise the use of “environmentally preferred” materials, such as organic cotton and recycled fibres earlier this month.

 

Consumers do not want to buy products made with forced labour…Without government regulations, many companies will continue to make choices based on profits not on rights.

Laura Murphy, professor of human rights and contemporary slavery, Helena Kennedy Centre for International Justice

 

Improved data mapping tools should help to shed light on fashion’s murky supply chains. Many brands do not have reliable information on their upstream suppliers beyond the manufacturers they deal with. Data from cotton farms and spinners are rarely available on paper, let alone a digital format. Blind-spots are perpetuating environmental and social problems that have dogged the industry for decades.

Cotton supply, in particular, has come under the spotlight. China’s northwestern Xinjiang region, which produces a fifth of the world’s cotton, is where the Chinese government has allegedly committed grave human-rights violations against the largely Muslim population of Uyghurs and other minorities.

A new report published on 17 November by Sheffield Hallam University in the United Kingdom analysed supply chain connections identified through shipping records to show how cotton from the Uyghur region circumvents supply standards and import bans to end up in consumer wardrobes around the world.

In the report, Laundering Cotton: How Xinjiang Cotton is Obscured in International Supply Chains, Professor Laura Murphy and co-authors identify more than 50 contract garment suppliers – in Indonesia, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Vietnam, India, Pakistan, Kenya, Ethiopia, China and Mexico – that use the Xinjiang fabric and yarn in the clothes they make for leading brands, “thus obscuring the provenance of the cotton.”

“The benefits of such an export strategy may be clear: the end buyer is no longer directly involved in buying Xinjiang cotton,” the report said. “International brands and wholesalers can buy from factories in third countries that have few visible ties with Uyghur region-based companies.”

The researchers identified over 100 international retailers downstream of Xinjiang cotton, Murphy told media on a call on Friday. These include Levi Strauss, Lululemon, H&M, Marks & Spencer and Uniqlo, according to the report.

“Consumers do not want to buy products made with forced labour,” Murphy told Eco-Business. “We need our governments to insist that companies trace their supply chains back to the raw materials and make those findings public. Without government regulations, many companies will continue to make choices based on profits not on rights.”

 


 

Source Eco Business

Carbon Innovation Fund: Co-op to allocate £3m to projects creating low-carbon food systems

Carbon Innovation Fund: Co-op to allocate £3m to projects creating low-carbon food systems

Announced today (23 November), the Carbon Innovation Fund will run for three years, offering £1m in grant funding annually to community environmental causes, social enterprises, charities, start-ups and collaborative projects working on solutions for a more sustainable food system.

Ten projects will be awarded each year by the Fund and each successful applicant will be entitled to a share of up to £100,000. Applicants will need to be UK-based but their projects could help decarbonisation at any point in the food system globally.

Co-op said in a statement that it will only support projects that contribute to “real systems change” for food. The company has also said the fund will support the preservation and dissemination of ancient and indigenous knowledge as well as supporting emerging technologies and processes.

“With the Carbon Innovation Fund, we’re looking to do something different; rather than ideas for individual commercial benefit, we want innovations that can be freely shared and can be of benefit to society in general,” said Co-op Food’s chief executive Jo Whitfield.

It’s this type of co-operation that we believe we need to help accelerate our response to the climate crisis.”

The Fund is being provided with money allocated from the Co-op; the retailer allocates 2p from every £1 of sales to its charitable foundation. Applications are open until 12pm on Friday 10 December 2021.

Earlier this year, the Co-op Group built on a commitment to reach carbon neutrality for all own-brand food and drink by 2025 with a detailed 10-point climate action plan. The firm’s long-term climate goal is net-zero across all scopes, for all Group activities, by 2040.

Then, at COP26 in Glasgow this month, the retailer joined competitors Sainsbury’s, Tesco, Waitrose & Partners and Marks & Spencer in signing a new joint commitment to halve the nature and climate impacts of food systems by 2030. This initiative is being orchestrated by WWF.

The news on the Carbon Innovation Fund comes on the same week that John Lewis & Partners, in partnership with environmental charity Hubbub, launched a new £1m fund for innovative projects that help to reduce waste across the food, textiles and technology sectors.

 


 

Source Edie

Cop26: African nations seek talks on $700bn climate finance deal

Cop26: African nations seek talks on $700bn climate finance deal

African nations want Cop26 to open discussions this week on a mega-financing deal that would channel $700bn (£520bn) every year from 2025 to help developing nations adapt to the climate crisis.

Tanguy Gahouma-Bekale, the chair of the African Group of Negotiators on climate change, said the increased finance was needed for the accelerated phase of decarbonisation required to hold global heating to 1.5C.

These funds would also be essential, he said, to cope with the impacts, including fiercer heat, widening droughts and more intense storms and floods, which are using up an increasingly large share of GDP. According to a recent study, some African nations are already spending more on climate adaptation than on healthcare and education.

“The work on this needs to start now,” said the climate diplomat from Gabon. “Talks about finance take time so we need to have a roadmap now with clear milestones on how to achieve targets after 2025 to ensure the money flows every year.”

It is also a question of justice. The climate problem was largely created by Europe, North America and east Asia, but the worst impacts are in the southern hemisphere. In 2009, rich nations promised $100bn a year, which was considered a downpayment and an important gesture of trust.

 

Until now, they have welched on the deal by providing only 80% of what they had promised. For the African group, Glasgow is a time to make amends and lift the level of support in line with the greater urgency demanded by science.

The money is needed immediately, say negotiators. According to a recent study by the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa, Cameron devotes close to 9% of its GDP on climate adaptation, Ethiopia 8%, Zimbabwe 9%, while Sierra Leone, Senegal and Ghana are all more than 7%. Even with these high shares of domestic funding, the study found a gap of about 80% between need and expenditure.

Gahouma-Bekale, who also serves as special adviser to the Gabonese president, Ali Bongo, said the opening phase of Cop26 had pushed the world in a more positive direction, but words needed to be backed by actions in the second week.

“We have received some assurance during the world leaders’ summit that they really want to close the gap and we have seen strong announcements on deforestation and methane,” he said. “What we want to see now is implementation. Only implementation can give us the assurance we need that we can keep warming to 1.5C.”

 

Africa accounts for less than 4% of historical global emissions, compared with 25% for China, 22% for the EU and 13% for China. But it has suffered many of the most devastating effects of climate disruption, recently including droughts in the Sahel and floods in the Nile delta. In future, it is expected to be among the most vulnerable regions of the world to heatwaves and crop failures.

 

 

Some African countries have shown leadership. Gabon is among a handful of nations that already have a carbon-negative economy because its vast tropical forests in the Congo Basin absorb more greenhouse gases than its factories, cars and cities emit. It has recently passed an ambitious climate law that aims to ensure the country remains dependant on forests and agriculture rather than the fossil fuel industry. To achieve this goal, it needs outside support so that the government can continue to raise living standards.

Many African nations depend on coal for electricity and did not join a declaration this week by more than 40 countries to quit this most polluting of fossil fuels. Gahouma-Bekale said this pledge was an important step forward, but developing nations would need more time.

“This is very good news for the world,” he said. “If we want to succeed with the Paris goals, then we must phase out all fossil fuels, and coal is among them. But our situation in Africa is different. We are still on our way to be developed. We can’t drastically stop coal and oil. For now we need to use it to eradicate poverty and access to energy. We will need support for the transition. And we need to be flexible. For five to 10 years, we must do the two together [coal and renewables] so the transition can be smooth.”

That transition will depend on a flow of funding. African nations insist wealthy countries are held as rigorously to account on their finance promises as they are on emissions reductions. That means regular reporting on the levels of support provided, needed and received.

“What we want to achieve at this Cop is a transparency framework with strong rules on accounting,” said Gahouma-Bekale.

 


 

Source The Guardian

Cutting methane should be a key Cop26 aim, research suggests

Cutting methane should be a key Cop26 aim, research suggests

Sharp cuts in methane from leaking gas drilling platforms and production sites could play a major role in the greenhouse gas emissions reductions necessary to fulfil the Paris climate agreement, and should be a key aim for the Cop26 UN climate talks, new research suggests.

Cutting global emissions of methane by 40% by 2030 is achievable, with most cuts possible at low cost or even at a profit for companies such as oil and gas producers. It would make up for much of the shortfall in emissions reductions plans from national governments, according to the Energy Transitions Commission thinktank.

Ahead of Cop26, senior UN and UK officials have privately conceded that the top aim of the conference – for all countries to formulate plans called nationally determined contributions (NDCs), that would add up to a global 45% cut in emissions by 2030 – will not be met.

 

However, the UK as hosts of the summit, to be held in Glasgow in November, still hope for enough progress to show that the world can still limit global heating to 1.5C, the aspiration of the 2015 Paris climate agreement.

Methane is a powerful greenhouse gas, about 80 times more potent than carbon dioxide in warming the planet. It is the biggest component of natural gas, used for fuel, and leaks can be caused by poorly constructed conventional drilling operations, shale gas wells, gas pipelines and other fossil fuel infrastructure. Methane is also flared from some oil production sites.

Staunching such leaks or capturing the methane instead can be done at a low cost, and can even be profitable for gas producers, especially now as the international gas price soars. Just a few key producers – Russia, the US, China and Canada – could make a massive impact.

Lord Adair Turner, chairman of the ETC, said: “It is clear that if you add up NDCs they are not big enough to keep us to 1.5C. There is a huge gap left. But there are some actions that you can imagine groups of countries taking that could close that gap.”

The US and the EU recently announced a partnership aiming at reducing methane emissions by 30% by 2030, but Turner said more could be achieved and this would help to compensate for the relatively unambitious NDCs that many countries have.

 

“We have not focused enough on methane, but it can be a really important lever, and cutting it has an impact [on global heating] sooner rather than later, which matters if there are feedback loops in the climate system,” he added.

Turner also pointed to other key actions that could be taken at Cop26 which he said would substantially help global efforts to tackle the climate crisis. For instance, helping developing countries to phase out their existing coal-fired power plants was one key way of reducing reliance on coal.

In India, for instance, new coal-fired power stations are now more expensive than renewable alternatives, yet the marginal cost of electricity generation from existing coal-fired power stations is still cheaper than wind or solar. That means companies have an incentive to keep old coal-fired power plants going, but if they could be paid to phase out the oldest, that would accelerate the country’s move away from coal.

“Developing countries need financial support to do this,” Turner said.

Steel should be another focus, according to Turner. Steel companies could move to “green” steel production, using hydrogen, far more easily than a few years ago, he said. A global agreement among steel producers at Cop26 could achieve that, and similar global agreements were possible among cement producers, the shipping industry and other high-carbon sectors.

Many countries, Turner added, were submitting NDCs that were too cautious or did not reflect how fast businesses were already cutting emissions and moving to green energy and clean technology. “NDCs have not caught up with what is possible and what is actually happening,” he said.

 


 

Source The Guardian

Shipping firm Maersk spends £1bn on ‘carbon neutral’ container ships

Shipping firm Maersk spends £1bn on ‘carbon neutral’ container ships

The world’s biggest shipping company is investing $1.4bn (£1bn) to speed up its switch to carbon neutral operations, ordering eight container vessels that can be fuelled by traditional bunker fuel and methanol.

The Danish shipping business Maersk said the investment in new vessels would help to ship goods from companies including H&M Group and Unilever, while saving more than 1m tonnes of carbon emissions a year by replacing older fossil fuel-driven ships.

The vessel order, placed with South Korea’s Hyundai Heavy Industries, is the single largest step taken so far to decarbonise the global shipping industry, which is responsible for almost 3% of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions.

The shipping industry has been relatively slow to react to calls to reduce fossil fuel use, in part because cleaner alternatives have been in short supply and are more expensive.

Søren Skou, the Maersk chief executive, said: “The time to act is now, if we are to solve shipping’s climate challenge.

“This order proves that carbon neutral solutions are available today across container vessel segments and that Maersk stands committed to the growing number of our customers who look to decarbonise their supply chains.

“Further, this is a firm signal to fuel producers that sizeable market demand for the green fuels of the future is emerging at speed.”

The eight vessels, which will each have capacity for 16,000 containers, are expected to be delivered by early 2024. They will be 10-15% more expensive than bunker fuel container ships, each costing $175m.

The Danish company aims to only order new vessels that can use carbon neutral fuel as it seeks to deliver net zero emissions by 2050.

Maersk said more than half of its 200 largest customers – including Amazon, Disney and Microsoft – had set or were in the process of setting targets to cut emissions in their supply chains.

Maersk plans to run the vessels on methanol, rather than fossil fuels, as soon as possible but admitted this would be challenging because it would require a significant increase in the production of “proper carbon neutral methanol”.

The company set out plans last week to produce green fuel for its first vessel to operate on carbon neutral methanol alongside REintegrate, a subsidiary of the Danish renewable energy company European Energy.

The Danish facility is expected to produce about 10,000 tonnes of carbon neutral e-methanol, using green hydrogen combined with carbon emissions captured from burning bioenergy such as biomass.

Henriette Hallberg Thygesen, the chief executive of Maersk’s fleet and strategic brands, said the green methanol partnership could “become a blueprint for how to scale green fuel production” and “decarbonise our customers’ supply chains”.

The new additions to Maersk’s fleet are “the ideal large vessel type to enable sustainable, global trade on the high seas in the coming decades”, she said, and “will offer our customers unique access to carbon neutral transport on the high seas while balancing their needs for competitive slot costs and flexible operations”.

Leyla Ertur, the head of sustainability at H&M Group, said Maersk’s investment in large vessels operating on green methanol was “an important innovative step supporting the retailer’s climate goals” to become climate neutral by 2030 and climate positive by 2040.

 


 

Source The Guardian

 

Climate change: Israel to cut 85% of emissions by mid-century

Climate change: Israel to cut 85% of emissions by mid-century

Israel will cut carbon emissions by 85% from 2015 levels by the middle of the century, its government says.

Its prime minister said the decision would help the country gradually shift to a low-carbon economy.

Targets include cutting the vast majority of emissions from transport, the electricity sector and municipal waste.

But critics want more ambitious targets for renewable energy and bigger economic incentives for change.

The world has already warmed by about 1.2C since the industrial era began, and temperatures will keep rising unless governments around the world make steep cuts to emissions.

But Prime Minister Naftali Bennett said the move would lead to a “clean, efficient and competitive economy” and put Israel at the forefront of the battle against climate change.

Israel’s targets were in line with the 2015 Paris climate agreement – a legally binding international treaty on climate change adopted by nearly 200 countries.

It aims to keep global temperatures below 2.0C above pre-industrial times, and if possible below 1.5C above pre-industrial times.

Israel signed the Paris climate deal. It has set itself an interim goal of cutting emissions by 27% by 2030.

Under President Donald Trump the US pulled out of the deal but President Joe Biden has recommitted to it.

 


 

Source BBC

Global hydrogen investment to grow 25-fold by 2040, Bloomberg predicts

Global hydrogen investment to grow 25-fold by 2040, Bloomberg predicts

Published this week to mark the launch of a new ‘Hydrogen Theme Basket’ and global dashboard on the topic for the Bloomberg Intelligence (BI) website, the report states that “a global climate push to decarbonise industries most in need of environmental remediation could turn hydrogen from a cottage sector into a behemoth with the help of government subsidies that attract investment to meet net-zero emissions targets”.

As such, hydrogen generation and related infrastructure and services could represent a $2.5trn global investment opportunity through to 2050. Sectors set to take a lion’s share include energy generation, chemical and metallurgic firms, with those already implementing low-carbon technologies set to benefit more than those lagging on decarbonisation.

Specifically, BI expects global annual investment in the hydrogen sector to average $38bn between 2020 and 2040, rising to $181bn between 2041 and 2070. The need for nations to meet net-zero targets is cited as a primary driver for scaling in this first timeframe, and the maturity of technologies and increasing energy demand cited as drivers post-2041.

Under BI’s projections, hydrogen will account for 10% of the world’s final energy consumption by 2050. The proportion will be higher in marine transport (50%), road transport (25%) and aviation (25%) than other sectors, with building heating behind the average at just 5%. Instead, ground and air-source heat pumps will be the primary technology.

While hydrogen is not presently a major sector, BI believes that some companies are poised to gain an ‘early mover advantage’. They include Shell, Orsted, Engie and Neste in the energy sector and Alstom and ITM power in the industrials and equipment sectors.

 

Truly green?

There is, however, the question of ensuring that growth is truly green. More than 90% of the hydrogen produced globally in 2020 used fossil-fuel-based processes, and criticism is mounting around ‘blue hydrogen’, which is produced using natural gas but co-located with carbon capture technologies.

BI predicts that new national legislation, including subsidies, will help to displace ‘grey’ hydrogen, but that questions about whether ‘green’ hydrogen will be the primary replacement remains. “Water supply constraints, costly components and relatively low energy density are key challenges for green hydrogen,” the report states. It forecasts that ‘grey’ hydrogen will account for less than half of global output by the mid-2030s and continue to decline steeply through to 2070.

The EU is named as a policy leader on green hydrogen. The bloc has a pledge to deliver at least 6W of green hydrogen capacity by 2030 – a feat which will take 150bn of investment, to derive from both public and private sources. Questions remain about whether ‘blue’ or ‘turquoise’ hydrogen generation will be included in accounting towards this target.

In the UK, the long-awaited Hydrogen Strategy is due imminently, following Covid-19-related delays. It will build on the Government’s initial £500m investment in the Ten Point Plan – dedicated to help deliver an ambition to host 5GW of electrolyser capacity by the end of the decade.

 


 

By Sarah George

Source Edie

Investa’s race to net zero emissions

Investa’s race to net zero emissions

Contents

Introduction
What is a science-based net zero emissions target?
What does Investa’s science-based net zero emissions target look like?
How will Investa achieve net zero emissions?
How is Investa working with tenant customers?

 

Introduction

In the race to net zero emissions, Investa took an early lead as the first Australian property company to commit to a science-based target in 2015. Nina James, General Manager for Corporate Sustainability and Responsible Investment, shares Investa’s progress and explains why Investa customers should care.

When Australia signed on to the Paris Agreement, we agreed to play our part to limit global warming to well below 2°C, preferably to 1.5°C, compared to pre-industrial levels. To achieve this, we must halve greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 and achieve a climate neutral world – or net zero emissions – by 2050.

Around 20% of Australia’s greenhouse gas emissions come from our buildings. Businesses play a central role in driving down greenhouse gas emissions in their commercial offices, but a resilient, zero-emissions future must be underpinned by robust science.

“When Investa committed to a science-based target in 2016, we charted a course to net zero emissions by 2040. To do this, we have set a bona fide carbon reduction target that is verified against the climate change science and the Paris Agreement,” James explains.

 

What is a science-based net zero emissions target?

Any company can set a carbon reduction target. But how do we know that the target is ambitious enough to achieve net zero emissions?

Science-based targets help companies to understand how much and how quickly they need to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions to prevent the worst effects of climate change.

“Investa has always had a strong commitment to third-party verification,” James says. “We have certified our portfolio of assets under the NABERS and Green Star rating systems. We report to GRESB, the global benchmark for sustainable real estate, each year. And we have been a signatory to the UN Principles for Responsible Investment since 2007. When we set our carbon target the same expectation applied.”

Investa established its target through the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi), a global organisation that sets the ‘gold standard’ for corporate emissions reduction. More than 1,200 companies have committed to cut their carbon footprints and 593, including Investa, have had their targets approved by SBTi.

SBTi’s 2020 progress report shows science-based targets work. The typical company with science-based targets has reduced its direct emissions (Scope 1 and 2) at a rate of 6.4% per year. This exceeds the 4.2% rate needed to limit warming to 1.5°C.

Investa has reduced emissions by a massive 63.3% since 2004.

 

Investa’s science-based target was pivotal for the property industry. By working through the complexity raised by science-based targets, Investa showed everyone that it could be done.

Davina Rooney, CEO, Green Building Council of Australia

 

What does Investa’s science-based net zero emissions target look like?

Davina Rooney, Chief Executive Officer of the Green Building Council of Australia, says Investa’s net zero goal was a “game-changer” for the nation’s buildings.

“Investa’s science-based target was pivotal for the property industry. By working through the complexity raised by science-based targets, Investa showed everyone that it could be done, and gave other property companies the confidence to pursue their own ambitious sustainability goals,” Rooney explains.

Australia’s property industry can achieve net zero emissions by 2050 using technologies that exist today, Rooney adds.

“The Low Carbon, High Performance report finds eliminating emissions from our buildings would also deliver $20 billion in financial savings by 2030, and improve the productivity and quality of life of Australian businesses and households.”

Investa has committed to reduce Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions by 60% per square metre of net lettable area by 2030 and 100% by 2040 from a 2015 baseline. We have also committed to reduce Scope 3 greenhouse emissions by 26% per net lettable area by 2030 and 42% by 2040 from a 2015 baseline.

Importantly, this target includes Scope 3 emissions – the emissions that are generated by our tenant customers.

“Reducing our tenant customers’ emissions is embedded in our commitment, and that sets us apart,” James says.

“It says we are accountable for more than what’s in our own backyard. We might not control Scope 3 emissions, but we want to walk alongside our tenant customers, arm in arm, to help them reduce their footprint.”

James says Investa is “thrilled” to see nearly every large Australian property company set competitive targets since 2015. “They’ve used our target as a bookend – and that makes our team proud.”

 

Let’s break down Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions

Scope 1 emissions – or direct emissions – are from sources that a company owns or controls, like emissions produced during manufacturing, or from business travel in a company car,

Scope 2 emissions are indirect emissions from the purchase of electricity, steam, heating and cooling for the company’s own use.

Scope 3 emissions cover emissions outside a company’s boundary – like the emissions from employees’ commute, purchased good and services, or leased assets, like office buildings.

 

How will Investa achieve net zero emissions?

‘Net zero emissions’ means achieving overall balance between the emissions produced and those extracted from the atmosphere. Buildings can still produce some emissions, provided they are offset by activities that reduce those emissions, like planting forests.

Electricity and gas consumed in Investa’s buildings account for 99.6% of our greenhouse gas emissions. To achieve net zero emissions, we are addressing three areas:

1. Operations. By working alongside tenant customers to uncover new ways to enhance the energy performance of buildings we are making workplaces more productive, healthy and comfortable.

2. Design and construction. Changing the building envelope – considering solar glare and heat, orientation and thermal mass, the design of windows and services, for example – can realise big energy and carbon emissions savings for our customers.

3. Power. Sourcing zero-carbon energy, such as from solar or wind farms, addresses our residual power requirements and helps our customers to meet their net zero targets too.

 

How is Investa working with tenant customers?

Investa’s partnership with customers is at the heart of its strategy to cut carbon emissions.

“We don’t think it’s enough for us to address our base buildings. We want to share our ideas and intellectual property with our customers to drive a shift across Australia,” James explains.

In partnership with the Clean Energy Finance Corporation, Investa has created a free Sustainability Tenant Toolkit to help companies around Australia create low carbon, healthy workplaces.

“We have gathered all the information and ideas from 15 years of operating sustainable commercial offices. We aim to empower our 750 tenant organisations to improve the performance of their own tenancies,” James explains.

The Toolkit attracted nearly 37,000 unique visits in 2020 alone. From analysing the data, Investa knows that people want to understand how buildings influence health, wellbeing and productivity, and how they can actively improve the environmental sustainability of their office space.

Davina Rooney says the Toolkit is a “genuinely impressive piece of work to guide tenants on creating sustainable workplaces”.

“By tackling environmental sustainability from lots of different angles – from design and construction to how people use their office space – Investa has set the industry benchmark.”

James says the feedback Investa receives from tenant customers is “really exciting”.

“Tenants are making great savings in electricity by implementing the tips in our Toolkit. They tell us the Toolkit helps their people understand what wellness in the office looks like, and how engaged employees translate to bottom line benefits,” James says.

“Through the Toolkit, we’ve had direct conversations with 100,000 of our customers. But what makes us really proud is the fact that anyone can access the Toolkit. Sharing our knowledge is how we’ll move Australia towards net zero emissions.

The challenge of climate action is large, but so is Investa’s net zero ambition. This is why a staged approach is important, James explains.

“First, set the target, then gather and analyse the data, then enrol our tenants. That’s what we are doing – walking arm-in-arm with our tenants as an advisor. We are working with our customers to cut their carbon emissions and, at the same time, create more efficient, sustainable workplaces. We’re showing that it can be done.”

 

“We don’t think it’s enough for us to address our base buildings. We want to share our ideas and intellectual property with our customers to drive a shift across Australia.”

Nina James, General Manager, Corporate Sustainability, Investa

 


 

Source Investa