Search for any green Service

Find green products from around the world in one place

Australian mining billionaire to invest $2.2 bln in renewable energy project

Australian mining billionaire to invest $2.2 bln in renewable energy project

Australian iron ore magnate Andrew Forrest, who’s been betting big on a global green revolution, said on Sunday he was investing A$3 billion ($2.2 billion) in renewable energy in central Queensland.

Forrest, Australia’s richest man, said his company Squadron Energy has acquired the two-stage Clarke Creek project – a wind, solar and battery farm development – with contracts already issued for the immediate start of construction.

“We are investing in Clarke Creek not only to harness the renewable power of the wind and sun to energise our homes, our factories and our cities, but as a critical step towards breaking our reliance on fossil fuels,” Forrest said in a statement.

Forrest has said he wants to turn Fortescue Metals Group Ltd (FMG.AX), of which he is chairman, into the world’s biggest green energy group. read more

Stage one of the Clarke Wind project is anticipated to be fully operational in 2024. Stage two could come online in 2026, Forrest said.

When completed, the project could produce enough wind, solar and battery energy to power more than 660,000 homes, or 40% of Queensland households, Forrest said in the statement.

($1 = 1.3827 Australian dollars)

 


 

Source Reuters

New type of solar cell that can be put on windows and clothes could revolutionise green energy

New type of solar cell that can be put on windows and clothes could revolutionise green energy

A new kind of solar cell, that is so thin it can be stuck on walls and windows, with no discernible loss of light, looks set to give green energy a major boost within a decade after a Government-funded breakthrough in the technology.

A hundred times thinner than a human hair, the cell could be put on clothing to power wearable electronics, such as smart watches and Fitbits, its developers say.

It could be liberally applied to all sorts of surfaces, from industrial solar farm panels to household roofs; from cars and ships to temperature and other smart sensors.

And it could potentially even be used in space to help power telescopes, satellites and space ships, they suggest.

A breakthrough in the efficiency of this solar cell – which involves tiny crystals containing silver and bismuth metal – means it is now on the brink of being commercially viable to manufacture.

The developers hope they can double the efficiency within five years, making it comparable with the most efficient solar panels currently available.

And while they concede they may not achieve this goal they are confident that, even with much smaller improvements, the cells will be commercially available within a decade.

“This solar cell could revolutionise solar power,” Seán Kavanagh, of University College London, told i.

“They are so cheap and easy to manufacture that they have huge potential to be integrated everywhere in a ‘winning by numbers’ strategy’. They are so flexible and extremely thin that we wouldn’t even notice them,” he said.

“So while the power generated in a given area mightn’t be as high as a dedicated solar farm in the Sahara, the fact they are everywhere – and invisible – means we could still be capturing large amounts of energy with a vast ‘effective surface area’. To use a fishing analogy – instead of fishing for a a few really big fish, as a Saharan solar farm does, it’d be like fishing for millions of small fish with a huge net,” added Mr Kavanagh, a PhD student splitting his research between UCL and Imperial College London.

Researchers not directly involved in the research welcomed the breakthrough and said they, too, were hopeful it could be commercialised within a decade.

Professor Valeria Nicolosi, of Trinity College Dublin, said: “This is an exciting breakthrough which has the potential to transform solar power in the UK and overseas. It is another example of how fundamental studies can lead to work with huge societal impact.”

Dr Sam Stranks, Cambridge University, added: ‘This is an important breakthrough. If the efficiency can keep being improved, we may well see such technologies competitive in, for example, lightweight and wearable solar applications.”

Using complex computer modelling, researchers were able to significantly increase the efficiency of these new kind of solar cells, finding that an even, 50/50 spread of silver and bismuth atoms across the material increased how much light the nanocrystals absorbed, allowing more energy to be generated.

The breakthrough brings the efficiency of the cell to 9 per cent compared to 1 to 2 per cent a decade ago – meaning that 9 per cent of the energy from sunlight that it comes into contact with it is converted into electricity.

Conventional solar panels are 20 per cent efficient but they need to be more efficient because they are much more expensive and bulky, Mr Kavanagh says.

However, he is hopeful – although not certain – that the efficiency of his cell can be increased to around 20 per cent in five years or so – although a little more than it’s current level of 9 per cent would be fine to commercialise, he argues.

As well as converting natural sunlight into electricity, this new kind of solar cell can harvest artificial light from lightbulbs and use it to generate power indoors. This is something that conventional solar panels can’t do, which require natural light.

“You could integrate these solar cells into clothes, or wallpaper, for example where you ‘recycle’ the power from indoor lighting,” said Mr Kavanagh.

“This is particularly useful for ‘Internet of Things’ devices, like wearable electronics, smart sensors and others where their ‘smart’ function requires electric power. So rather than having loads of devices that need to be plugged into the grid or have batteries replaced, they can power themselves by constant absorbing light energy from the surroundings,” he said.

Mr Kavanagh worked on the solar technology with researchers at the Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Yonosei University in Seoul and the ICREA in Spain.

The research was funded by the UK Government, the European Research Council and the European Union’s Horizon 202 programme and is detailed in the journal Nature Photonics.

“As we move towards environmentally-friendly, low carbon sources of energy these findings are an important step towards increasing the efficiency of solar power technology,” said Dr Kedar Pandya, at EPSRC (Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council), the government research funding body.

“And by potentially reducing our dependency on the toxic or rare elements currently needed to produce solar cells, these findings could also deliver further environmental and cost benefits,” he said.

Seán Kavanagh is a third-year PhD candidate supervised by Professor David Scanlon, of UCL and Professor Aron Walsh, of Imperial College London, who were co-authors of the paper in Nature Photonics.

 


 

Source iNews

Tesco to stop selling baby wipes that contain plastic in first for UK supermarkets

Tesco to stop selling baby wipes that contain plastic in first for UK supermarkets

Tesco is to become the first of the main UK retailers to stop selling baby wipes containing plastic, which cause environmental damage as they block sewers and waterways after being flushed by consumers.

The supermarket said it was stopping sales of branded baby wipes containing plastic from 14 March, about two years after it ceased using plastic in its own-brand products.

The UK’s largest grocer is also the country’s biggest seller of baby wipes. Its customers purchase 75m packs of baby wipes every year, amounting to 4.8bn individual wipes.

Tesco said it had been working to reformulate some of the other own-label and branded wipes its sells to remove plastic, including cleaning wipes and moist toilet tissue. It said its only kind of wipe that still contained plastic – designed to be used for pets – would also be plastic-free by the end of the year.

Tesco began to remove plastic from its own-brand wet wipes in 2020, when it switched to biodegradable viscose, which it says breaks down far more quickly.

Sarah Bradbury, Tesco’s group quality director, said: “We have worked hard to remove plastic from our wipes as we know how long they take to break down.”

Tesco is not the first retailer to remove wipes from sale on environmental grounds. Health food chain Holland and Barrett said it was the first high-street retailer to ban the sale of all wet-wipe products from its 800 UK and Ireland stores in September 2019, replacing the entire range with reusable alternatives. The Body Shop beauty chain has also phased out all face wipes from its shops.

It is estimated that as many as 11bn wet wipes are used in the UK each year, with the majority containing some form of plastic, many of which are flushed down the toilet, causing growing problems for the environment.

Last November, MPs heard how wet wipes are forming islands, causing rivers to change shape as the products pile up on their banks, while marine animals are dying after ingesting microplastics.

They are also a significant component of the fatbergs that form in sewers, leading to blockages that require complex interventions to remove.

Tesco said any wipes it sold that could not be flushed down the toilet were clearly labelled “do not flush”.

Nevertheless, environmental campaigners and MPs have long called on retailers to do more to remove plastics from their products and packaging.

The supermarket said it was trying to tackle the impact of plastic waste as part of its “4Rs” packaging strategy, which involves it removes plastic waste where possible, or reducing it, while looking at ways to reuse more and recycle.

The chain said it had opened soft plastic collection points in more than 900 stores, and had launched a reusable packaging trial with shopping service Loop, which delivers food, drink and household products to consumers in refillable containers.

 


 

Source The Guardian

How AI could help bring a sustainable reckoning to hydropower

How AI could help bring a sustainable reckoning to hydropower

Hydropower has been stirring up controversies since the early 2000s. Despite being promoted as a solution to mitigate climate change, the hydropower bubble burst when researchers discovered in 2005 that hydropower dams are responsible for huge amounts of greenhouse gas emissions.

Hydropower dams’ walls restrict the flow of rivers and turn them into pools of stagnant water. As these reservoirs age, organic matter like algal biomass and aquatic plants accumulates and eventually decomposes and sinks. That oxygen-poor environment stimulates methane production.

Reservoir surfaces and turbines then release methane into the atmosphere. Methane makes up approximately 80 percent of the greenhouse gases emitted from hydropower dams, peaking in the first decade of the dams lifecycle.

Methane is infamous for lingering around in the atmosphere for 12 years and is at least 25 times more potent than carbon dioxide. Researchers estimate that at least 10 percent of the world’s hydropower dams emit as much greenhouse gases per unit of energy as coal-fired power plants. In the Amazon basin, several existing dams are up to ten times more carbon-intensive than coal power plants.

Despite this, there is still an aggressive push for constructing new hydropower dams in the Brazilian Amazon and the Himalayas. “​​In light of this expected boom in construction of new hydropower dams, it is critical to identify whether future dams will produce low-carbon energy,” an international team of researchers wrote in a 2019 Nature Communications study.

 

Using AI to plan a more sustainable dam

To identify environmentally-friendly sites for new hydropower dams, the 2019 team harnessed data from a sophisticated computational model that uses artificial intelligence (AI). They observed that lowland dams in Brazil (a predominantly lowland country) tend to have large reservoir areas which yield significantly higher carbon intensities. The Brazilian Amazon has the highest number of carbon-intensive dams as compared to the mountainous parts of Bolivia, Ecuador, and Peru. Higher elevation and steep topography, they found, make for less carbon-intensive hydropower.

New projects have been proposed at least 351 sites spread across the Amazon, which already is home to 158 hydropower dams. To find solutions for minimizing the environmental consequences of these projects, researchers are continuing to harness data with AI.

In a recent study published in the journal Science last week, a team of researchers utilized AI to scale the Amazon basin. They found that uncoordinated hydropower expansion resulted in forgone ecosystem benefits. Additionally, effective dam arrangements in other locations could generate four times more power.

“AI is being used by Wall Street, by social media, for all kinds of purposes – why not use AI to tackle serious problems like sustainability?” study author Carla Gomes, a computer scientist at Cornell University, said in a press release.

Various environmental criteria, like river flow and connectivity, greenhouse gas emissions, fish diversity, and sediment transport, of the entire Amazon basin, must be considered while selecting sites for new projects, the researchers argue.

While implementing policies based on such scientific evidence is vital for building sustainable hydropower dams, researchers are also looking for ways to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from existing projects via methane extraction.

 

Extracting—and using—reservoir methane

The idea to extract the methane accumulating in lakes and dam reservoirs for energy production is not new. In East Africa, saltwater-filled Lake Kivu holds 60 cubic kilometers of methane and another 300 cubic kilometers of dissolved carbon dioxide. The methane is extracted from the lake’s deep waters with a gas separator for producing electricity at the KivuWatt power plant in Rwanda.

Inspired by this possibility, Maciej Bartosiewicz, a geophysicist from the Polish Academy of Sciences, and his colleagues propose using solid mineral absorbents called zeolites for separating methane from reservoir sediments. In a study published in the journal Environmental Science and Technologythey designed a model mechanism to deploy zeolites coupled with activated carbon that could be placed at the bottom of reservoirs.

So far, scientists have been unable to extract methane from freshwater bodies such as lakes and reservoirs because the gas is available at far lower concentrations. This has previously made methane extraction in smaller quantities far too expensive. But Bartosiewicz says zeolites are cheap and widely available, which could offer a viable solution.

“The system contains a gasification component that is a membrane in a box. Then zeolites could capture methane after removing carbon dioxide,” says Bartosiewicz. Installing a pumping system could further boost extraction.

Still, methane extraction from reservoirs’ sediments is not devoid of ecological consequences. The process could result in a significant disruption in the ecosystem’s biological composition by affecting the growth of bacteria that process methane in sediments—eventually impacting the food web productivity. In reservoirs and lakes where bottom methane levels are high, these bacteria are a vital source of food and energy for microscopic marine animals. Still, water bodies have the remarkable ability to self-regulate, argues Bartosiewicz.

“We still need to develop the next generation of solutions for renewable energy production. This could be a possibility,” he says. “Methane extraction will not be possible in all hydropower reservoirs. But if we can produce even five percent of energy from this methane, it will add to the quota of renewable energy.”

 


 

Source Popsci

Budget 2022: More electric vehicle charging points closer to homes as part of Singapore Green Plan

Budget 2022: More electric vehicle charging points closer to homes as part of Singapore Green Plan

SINGAPORE: From building more electric vehicle charging points to issuing more green bonds to fund public sector green infrastructure projects, Singapore is taking steps to “move decisively” towards a net-zero world.

Delivering his Budget speech on Friday (Feb 18), Finance Minister Lawrence Wong said the path towards net-zero will entail “significant” economic restructuring and changes in how people live and work in future.

“All of us – the public, businesses, the government – will face difficult choices,” he said. “Costly investments may be required, for example, to import or generate low carbon energy.”

“But now is the time when we must move decisively towards the future of a net-zero world. This will allow us to tap fully on the many exciting possibilities in this green transition.”

 

GREENING SINGAPORE’S TRANSPORT

To make transport greener, Singapore will accelerate the adoption of electric vehicles (EVs).

During Budget 2020, Deputy Prime Minister and then-Finance Minister Heng Swee Keat announced that the country would gradually phase out internal combustion engine vehicles by 2040.

Since then, the Government has provided “significant” incentives for EV adoption, said Mr Wong.

Last year, the EV share of new car registration jumped to around 4 per cent, up from 0.2 per cent in 2020, he added.

To keep up the momentum, Mr Wong announced that more EV charging points will be built closer to where people live.

“To do this, infrastructure upgrades will be necessary, and the financing can come from green bonds,” he said.

 

DEVELOPING A ROBUST GREEN FINANCE MARKET

Another area of focus for the country is green finance, which is currently one of the fastest-growing segments in the financial services sector. Singapore accounts for close to half of the ASEAN green bond and loan market.

“We aim to do more, so that banks and financial institutions will use Singapore as a base to develop their capabilities, and develop innovative green financial solutions to service their customers all over Asia and the world,” said Mr Wong.

To help develop a robust green finance market, Mr Wong announced that the government will issue S$35 billion of green bonds by 2030 to fund public sector green infrastructure projects. This is up from the S$19 billion of green bonds announced previously during last year’s Budget.

“This will include bonds issued by the government, as well as statutory boards. The government will also publish a Singapore Green Bond framework and issue its inaugural green bond later this year,” he added.

 


 

Source Channel News Asia

Bacteria upcycle carbon waste into valuable chemicals

Bacteria upcycle carbon waste into valuable chemicals

Bacteria are known for breaking down lactose to make yogurt and sugar to make beer. Now researchers led by Northwestern University and LanzaTech have harnessed bacteria to break down waste carbon dioxide (CO2) to make valuable industrial chemicals.

In a new pilot study, the researchers selected, engineered and optimized a bacteria strain and then successfully demonstrated its ability to convert COinto acetone and isopropanol (IPA).

Not only does this new gas fermentation process remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere, it also avoids using fossil fuels, which are typically needed to generate acetone and IPA. After performing life-cycle analysis, the team found the carbon-negative platform could reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 160% as compared to conventional processes, if widely adopted.

“The accelerating climate crisis, combined with rapid population growth, pose some of the most urgent challenges to humankind, all linked to the unabated release and accumulation of COacross the entire biosphere,” said Northwestern’s Michael Jewett, co-senior author of the study. “By harnessing our capacity to partner with biology to make what is needed, where and when it is needed, on a sustainable and renewable basis, we can begin to take advantage of the available COto transform the bioeconomy.”

Jewett is the Walter P. Murphy Professor of Chemical and Biological Engineering at Northwestern’s McCormick School of Engineering and director of the Center for Synthetic Biology. He co-led the study with Michael Koepke and Ching Leang, both researchers at LanzaTech.

Necessary industrial bulk and platform chemicals, acetone and IPA are found nearly everywhere, with a combined global market topping $10 billion. Widely used as a disinfectant and antiseptic, IPA is the basis for one of the two World Health Organization-recommended sanitizer formulas, which are highly effective in killing the SARS-CoV-2 virus. And acetone is a solvent for many plastics and synthetic fibers, thinning polyester resin, cleaning tools and nail polish remover.

While these chemicals are incredibly useful, they are generated from fossil resources, leading to climate-warming CO2 emissions.

To manufacture these chemicals more sustainably, the researchers developed a new gas fermentation process. They started with Clostridium autoethanogenum, an anaerobic bacterium engineered at LanzaTech. Then, the researchers used synthetic biology tools to reprogram the bacterium to ferment CO2 to make acetone and IPA.

 

By harnessing our capacity to partner with biology to make what is needed, where and when it is needed, on a sustainable and renewable basis, we can begin to take advantage of the available COto transform the bioeconomy.”

Michael Jewett, Synthetic Biologist

 

“These innovations, led by cell-free strategies that guided both strain engineering and optimization of pathway enzymes, accelerated time to production by more than a year,” Jewett said.

The Northwestern and LanzaTech teams believe the developed strains and fermentation process will translate to industrial scale. The approach also could potentially be applied to create streamlined processes for generating other valuable chemicals.

“This discovery is a major step forward in avoiding a climate catastrophe,” said Jennifer Holmgren, LanzaTech CEO. “Today, most of our commodity chemicals are derived exclusively from new fossil resources such as oil, natural gas or coal. Acetone and IPA are two examples with a combined global market of $10 billion. The acetone and IPA pathways developed will accelerate the development of other new products by closing the carbon cycle for their use in multiple industries.”

Jewett is a member of the Chemistry of Life Processes Institute, Simpson Querrey Institute for BioNanotechnology and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University.

The study, “Carbon-negative, scaled-up production of acetone and isopropanol by gas fermentation,” was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Bioenergy Technologies Office (award numbers DE-EE0007566 and CRADA/NFE-16-06364), DOE Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research Division, Genomic Science Program (award numbers DE-SC0018249 and FWP ERKP903), the David and Lucile Packard Foundation and the Camille Dreyfus Teacher-Scholar Program.

 


 

Source Northwestern

Singapore hikes carbon price, announces 2050 net-zero target

Singapore hikes carbon price, announces 2050 net-zero target

Singapore has announced a steep rise in the price heavy polluters must pay for carbon emissons, as it looks to set more ambitious climate targets, in line with what scientists say is needed to battle global warming.

It is also aiming to achieve net-zero carbon emissions “by or around” 2050, bringing forward an earlier commitment of reaching that target in the second half of the century “as soon as viable”.

Singapore finance minister Lawrence Wong made the announcements during the annual national budget session in Parliament, while warning that public spending on these efforts will be high for a country with limited potential to deploy renewable energy.

The cost of carbon will reach S$50-80 (US$37-60) per tonne by 2030, up from S$5 today – one of the lowest prices charged globally for carbon pollution.

The increase will be introduced in stages, starting from S$25 in 2024. Electricity bills for four-room government flats are expected to rise by about S$4 – an increase of about 4.5 per cent. The government has promised subsidies for lower-income groups.

The carbon price will rise to S$45 in 2026.

Wong said the carbon tax revenue will continue to be used in green technology investments.

“Over the coming decade, we expect to see a greening of traditional sectors of our economy like aviation, energy and tourism. At the same time, emerging green sectors like green finance and carbon services will grow in prominence,” he said.

Ajay Kumar Sanganeria, head of tax at accounting firm KPMG Singapore said that the increase in carbon tax “comes as no surprise” given the government’s 10-year green plan announced last year.

“What is good is that this change is staggered, giving businesses sufficient time to adjust and decarbonise, while minimising the impact to their business,” he added.

There was no mention of whether the criteria for who pays the tax is changing. Currently, it is levied on facilities that emit more than 25,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide yearly.

The entities that pay the carbon tax have not been made public, but the government says the scheme covers about 50 facilities in the industry, power and waste sectors, covering 80 per cent of national emissions.

In a Parliament motion last month, politicians had asked to increase the coverage of the carbon tax to those emitting 2,000 tonnes of carbon a year. There are about 200 such facilities in Singapore.

The upper limit of S$80 (US$60) for 2030 still falls short of the US$100 estimate various think-tanks have proposed to keep climate change below 2 degrees Celsius, a global target set in the landmark 2015 Paris Agreement.

Resource consultancy Wood Mackenzie had also estimated that carbon prices need to reach US$160 per tonne by 2030 to keep global warming below 1.5 degrees Celsius – a target that scientists say helps to dodge the worst effects of climate change.

Firms paying Singapore’s carbon tax will be allowed to use “high quality” international carbon credits to offset up to 5 per cent of their annual payments.

Singapore has a voluntary global carbon exchange, Climate Impact X, set up with local financial institutions. The government-backed bourse is looking to auction carbon credits this year following trials with forest protection projects in Africa, Asia and Latin America.

The government also announced a “transition framework” that will help defray costs for emitters, tagged to efficiency standards and decarbonisation targets.

“This will help mitigate the impact on business costs while still encouraging decarbonisation,” said Wong.

 

Climate ambition

The finance minister said Singapore was on-track to reach its target of peak emissions by 2030.

The country could bring forward its net-zero targets because international carbon markets and green technologies have become more developed, he added.

Singapore is eyeing carbon capture and hydrogen fuel to help decarbonise its large power and chemicals industry. It awarded S$55 million last year to 12 research projects in these areas, involving large petrochemical firms and local research centres.

“We aim to move Singapore into the forefront of green technologies, where new innovations are developed, trialled, scaled up and eventually exported to the rest of the world. We will work hard to grab first-mover advantage,” Wong said.

Other measures announced include the issuance of S$35 billion of green bonds by 2030 to fund public sector projects. Such bonds have been used to finance a waste and water treatment facility in Singapore.

The government is also looking to further boost the adoption of electric vehicles. It already has a target of phasing out cars that run only on fossil fuels by 2040, and aims to install 60,000 electric car charging points by 2030.

More details on the measures announced are expected in the coming weeks, as the government debates the details of how it intends to spend money in the financial year ahead.

“The climate measures announced today during the Budget are a step in the right direction,” said Isaac Neo, spokesperson for advocacy group Singapore Climate Rally.

“However, there was no update to the 2030 target, which is also important as cutting emissions earlier rather than later will mitigate more warming,” Neo added. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change had said global emissions need to be halved by 2030.

“High income countries like Singapore should achieve these goals even earlier to give low income countries more time to transition,” Neo added.

 


 

Source Eco Business

Low-technology: why sustainability doesn’t have to depend on high-tech solutions

Low-technology: why sustainability doesn’t have to depend on high-tech solutions

It’s a popular idea that the path to sustainability lies in high-tech solutions. By making everyday items like cars electric, and installing smart systems to monitor and reduce energy use, it seems we’ll still be able to enjoy the comforts to which we’ve become accustomed while doing our bit for the planet – a state known as “green growth”.

But the risks of this approach are becoming ever clearer. Many modern technologies use materials like copper, cobalt, lithium and rare earth elements. These metals are in devices like cell phones, televisions and motors. Not only is their supply finite, but large amounts of energy are required for their extraction and processing – producing significant emissions.

Plus, many of these devices are inherently difficult to recycle. This is because to make them, complex mixes of materials are created, often in very small quantities. It’s very expensive to collect and separate them for recycling.

Among others, these limitations have led some to question the high-tech direction our society is taking – and to develop a burgeoning interest in low-tech solutions. These solutions prioritise simplicity and durability, local manufacture, as well as traditional or ancient techniques.

What’s more, low-tech solutions often focus on conviviality. This involves encouraging social connections, for example through communal music or dance, rather than fostering the hyper-individualism encouraged by resource-hungry digital devices.

“Low-tech” does not mean a return to medieval ways of living. But it does demand more discernment in our choice of technologies – and consideration of their disadvantages.

 

Origins of low-tech

Critics have proclaimed the downsides of excessive technology for centuries, from 19th century Luddites to 20th century writers like Jacques Ellul and Lewis Mumford. But it was the western energy crisis in the 1970s that really popularised these ideas.

 

Low-tech emphasises efficiency and simplicity. CityHarvestNY/Wikimedia

 

British economist E.F. Schumacher’s 1973 book Small is Beautiful presented a powerful critique of modern technology and its depletion of resources like fossil fuels. Instead, Schumacher advocated for simplicity: locally affordable, efficient technologies (which he termed “intermediate” technologies), like small hydroelectricity devices used by rural communities.

Schumacher’s mantle has been taken up by a growing movement calling itself “low-tech”. Belgian writer Kris de Dekker’s online Low-Tech Magazine has been cataloguing low-tech solutions, such as windmills that use friction to heat buildings, since 2007. In particular, the magazine explores obsolete technologies that could still contribute to a sustainable society: like fruit walls used in the 1600s to create local, warm microclimates for growing Mediterranean fruits.

In the US, architect and academic Julia Watson’s book Lo-TEK (where TEK stands for Traditional Ecological Knowledge) explores traditional technologies from using reeds as building materials to creating wetlands for wastewater treatment.

And in France, engineer Philippe Bihouix’s realisation of technology’s drain on resources led to his prize-winning book The Age of Low Tech. First published in 2014, it describes what life in a low-tech world might be like, including radically cutting consumption.

 

Principles of low-tech include efficiency, durability and accessibility. Arthur Keller and Emilien Bournigal/Wikimedia

 

Bihouix presents seven “commandments” of the low-tech movement. Among others, these cover the need to balance a technology’s performance with its environmental impact, being cautious of automation (especially where employment is replaced by increased energy use), and reducing our demands on nature.

But the first principle of low-tech is its emphasis on sobriety: avoiding excessive or frivolous consumption, and being satisfied by less beautiful models with lower performance. As Bihouix writes:

 

A reduction in consumption could make it quickly possible to rediscover the many simple, poetic, philosophical joys of a revitalised natural world … while the reduction in stress and working time would make it possible to develop many cultural or leisure activities such as shows, theatre, music, gardening or yoga.

 

Ancient solutions

Crucially, we can apply low-tech principles to our daily lives now. For example, we can easily reduce energy demand from heating by using warm clothes and blankets. Food, if it’s packaged at all, can be bought and stored in reusable, recyclable packaging like glass.

Architecture offers multiple opportunities for low-tech approaches, especially if we learn from history. Using ancient windcatcher towers designed to allow external cool air to flow through rooms lets buildings be cooled using much less energy than air conditioning. And storing heat in stones, used by the Romans for underfloor heating, is being considered today as a means of dealing with the intermittency of renewable energy.

 

Windcatchers in Yazd, Iran, cool buildings using wind. Ms96/Wikimedia

 

Design and manufacture for sustainability emphasises reducing waste, often through avoiding mixing and contaminating materials. Simple materials like plain carbon steels, joined using removable fasteners, are easy to recycle and locally repair. Buses, trains and farm machinery using these steels, for example, can be much more readily refurbished or recycled than modern cars full of microelectronics and manufactured from sophisticated alloys.

In some places, the principles of low tech are already influencing urban design and industrial policy. Examples include “15-minute cities” where shops and other amenities are easily accessible to residents, using cargo bikes instead of cars or vans for deliveries, and encouraging repairable products through right-to-repair legislation in the EU and US.

Meanwhile, in Japan, there’s emerging interest in the reuse and recycling practices of the Edo period. From 1603 to 1867, the country was effectively closed to the outside world, with very limited access to raw materials. Therefore, extensive reuse and repair – even of things such as broken pottery or utensils with holes that we’d now regard as waste – became a way of life. Specialist repairers would mend or recycle everything from paper lanterns and books to shoes, pans, umbrellas and candles.

By following examples like these, we can make discerning technological choices a central part of our search for sustainable ways of living.

 


 

Source The Conversation

What does the future hold for sustainable packaging?

What does the future hold for sustainable packaging?

It was restrictions on shipping furniture to Europe using Styrofoam — a lightweight plastic foam that is notoriously bad for the environment — that inspired Alvin Lim to pivot to sustainable packaging in the mid-2000s.

“It was 2005, a time when outsourcing was sexy. I had multiple businesses, and one of them was producing furniture for the gaming industry. I was told that I couldn’t use Styrofoam to ship to Europe, or there would be tariffs. That led me to explore alternatives,” says the Singaporean entrepreneur, who went on to launch RyPax, a company that makes recyclable, biodegradable moulded fibre packaging from a blend of bamboo and sugarcane.

His first big move was to convert the Napa Valley wine industry from Styrofoam to moulded fibre in the United States. At the height of the wine club craze, RyPax shipped 67 40-feet high containers of wine shippers to wine producers. “The wine industry wanted to get out of Styrofoam — they never liked it. We gave them a classy, environmentally-friendly alternative,” says Lim.

 

Alvin Lim, chief executive of RyPax

 

The real breakthrough for his business came at Pack Expo, a packaging convention in Las Vegas. “We attracted a lot of interest, but there was one gentleman who spent 15 minutes at our booth inspecting our products. I was busy with another customer, so he slid his card on our desk, said ‘call me next week’ and walked away,” recalls Lim.

That interested customer would ultimately become RyPax’s flagship client.

A large, well-known consumer electronics brand known for its sleek design and intuitive products became a mirror image of RyPax’s own culture and approach to sustainability. Just as RyPax helped the client move out of plastic and into moulded fibre, the client inspired RyPax to switch to renewable energy to power its operations. As well as investing US$5 million to put solar panels on the roofs of its factories, RyPax has invested US$1 million in a wastewater system.

In this interview, Lim talks about innovation in packaging design, the weak links in the circular economy in Asia, and what will persuade consumers to pay more for sustainable packaging.

 

Which innovations in sustainable packaging design excite you the most at the moment?

A good example is a moulded fibre sleeve for bottles. Our strategic partner, James Cropper, produces a luxurious champagne bottle sleeve that is 100 per cent sustainable. The design reduces the carbon footprint of the packaging; you save on space, it’s lighter, you use less material, and you don’t need an expensive exterior box.

 

A moulded fibre champagne bottle cover by James Cropper. it’s lighter and uses less material. Image: James Cropper

 

Another example is the paper drinking bottle. A competitor has produced one using two pieces of paper stuck together with a lot of hot glue (so it’s really hard to separate) over a plastic lining.

There are challenges with paper bottles too. Is it commercially viable and ready for mass production? RyPax has taken up the challenge to address these issues. We have broken it down in phases. Firstly, we are working on a bladder system which uses either an aluminum or a thin plastic bottle that can be easily removed. We know that this is a not a viable long-term option, and so the next step that we are taking is to create a mono-material for the bottle body with a sustainable coating to hold the liquid in. Lastly, our company is working towards a goal of eliminating plastics completely, which spurred us to innovate a moulded fibre screw-top option that would be revolutionary.  

There are good ideas emerging in the industry, but a key issue is shared knowledge. Yes, corporate profits and competitor advantage are important, but the sooner good ideas can be shared the better. We need to look at the bigger picture. Once paper bottles a feasible at scale, a huge amount of plastic can be removed from the system.

 

Will sustainable packaging always be more expensive than single-use plastic packaging?

There is an inherent difference in properties between plastics and sustainable materials harvested from nature. As such, in certain applications, sustainable materials are still more expensive than plastics. However, technology and advancement in machinery are fast evolving, resulting in cost efficiencies for mass-produced sustainable materials and packaging.

Furthermore, governments across the globe are introducing tariffs on plastic use, which in turn will spur more companies to convert to a more sustainable approach, that may result in an overall cost reductions. 

Most sustainable materials are harvested from nature, and do not have the properties of plastics or metals. As such, in certain applications, sustainable materials are still more expensive than plastic. But technology is fast evolving, and may result in cost reductions for mass-produced sustainable materials. And if tariffs are placed on plastic, as a way to control plastic pollution, that could result in companies switching to more sustainable materials.

Recycled plastic is always going to be more expensive than virgin plastic, because of the cost of retrieving, processing and recycling it. In some applications, recycled paper may be more expensive than recycled plastic. Price parity may come when sustainable materials can scale, or when customers are willing to accept changes in design, because it’s more environmentally friendly.

 

What will persuade people to pay more for sustainable packaging?

It starts with education. If consumers are more aware of the damage that plastics cause the planet, they would be more inclined to help pay the cost of creating a circular economy.

 

Do you think that consumers are getting over the taboo of buying products made of recycled materials?

I think the big brands like Nike and Adidas are forcing the issue by using recycled material in their packaging and products. The intention is for it to look recycled with its mashed up designs speckled in various colours. Our partner, James Cropper, is upcycling takeaway coffee cups into luxury packaging, recycled bags and greetings cards. Now, there’s a big push for ocean plastic. Logitech has just announced an ocean plastic optical computer mouse. Once companies go down that route and recycled content becomes more accepted, then it’s just a matter of aesthetics. Some companies want a rough, unfinished, more natural look, some want a more premium look and feel. There is an increase in consumer demand for sustainable packaging or products and they are willing to pay for it. 

 

Which plastic products can be replaced with moulded fibre?

Another product that needs a design overhaul is clothes hangers. Why must they be made of plastic? RyPax is working on a moulded fibre clothes hanger to further eliminate single use plastics. Another is cosmetics, which are a major cause of single-use plastic pollution. Some components of lipsticks, such as the twist mechanism may need to remain plastic, but why can’t the rest be moulded fibre?

 

Clothes hangers made from moulded fibre. Image: RyPax

 

The packaging industry is growing rapidly, but is the waste management instructure in Asia developed enough to cope with this growth and bring about a circular economy?

No. It’s a big problem, which was laid bare when China stopped accepting waste material imports [in 2017]. That sent the price of raw materials through the roof. Recycled material prices shot up too. Economies of a certain size and maturity were able to cope, because they had recycled waste streams already in place. But most countries were unprepared, and they needed to look to other countries to process their waste. Take Singapore, for example. It lacks the infrastructure and industry to process recycled materials. So it was exported to countries like Indonesia, Vietnam, and Malaysia. These countries are not set up to process extra waste.

 

What is holding back the circular economy in Asia?

Infrastructure needs to change, and that will take time, investment and regulatory support. For example, for Singapore to develop a circular economy, it needs consumer buy-in, corporate willingness, and government support for industries that are moving towards more sustainable solutions.

 


 

Source Eco Business

Singapore exploring feasibility of piloted eVTOL trial as it eyes the growing global market

Singapore exploring feasibility of piloted eVTOL trial as it eyes the growing global market

SINGAPORE is exploring the feasibility of a piloted electric vertical take-off and landing (eVTOL) trial, as it eyes a slice of the growing global market for these vehicles, Deputy Prime Minister Heng Swee Keat said on Monday (Feb 14).

This comes as Singapore is looking to grow the advanced air mobility community at Seletar Aerospace Park, Heng said during the opening ceremony of the Singapore Airshow 2022 held at Marina Bay Sands.

The plan is to create an “enabling ecosystem” for a wide range of activities including research and development, commercialisation, manufacturing and eventually, maintenance, repair and operations (MRO), he said.

“To give a boost to this nascent industry, we are exploring the feasibility of the first piloted eVTOL trial in Singapore, possibly along the Greater Southern Waterfront,” Heng said.

He added that the government will be working closely with industry partners such as Volocopter and Skyports to develop use cases and operating frameworks.

Meanwhile, plans are also afoot to grow Seletar Aerospace Park into a leading aerospace industrial park in the region.

Heng said the government expects to complete construction of aeroSpace Three at the park.

He noted that it will provide aerospace companies with “plug and play” smart factory solutions for advanced aerospace manufacturing and MRO activities, adding that there is “good demand” for such customisable spaces.

These are part of Singapore’s plans to grow the aviation and aerospace sectors, Heng said, as he outlined Singapore’s vision in both the immediate and long term.

At the moment, the government’s focus is to invest in new capabilities and in its workers as it strengthens the path to recovery, he said, adding that this involves wage support as well as training programmes to upskill workers.

“In the coming decade, the flight path will be defined by digitalisation and sustainability. Hence, we must redouble efforts to make these major transitions and unlock new possibilities,” Heng said.

He noted that airports, airlines and the global aerospace industry are seeking to leverage digitalisation to transform their operations and Singapore is no different.

In the area of sustainability, Singapore is now piloting the use of sustainable aviation fuels at Changi Airport, while Finnish oil refinery Neste is expanding its presence in Singapore to produce renewable jet fuel at a commercial scale.

Touching on the next 20 years and beyond, Heng said: “New breakthroughs will reshape aviation and aerospace. We must invest in disruptive innovation today, to be at the forefront of change.”

Besides eVOTL, Heng said another possible gamechanger is autonomous aircraft.

For example, autonomous vehicles can be adopted for aviation, initially to guide and control aircraft and eventually to transport cargo and people autonomously, Heng suggested.

With the Airshow being the largest trade and exhibition show to be held in Singapore since the start of the Covid-19 pandemic 2 years ago, Heng said the event underlines the Republic’s belief in the long-term prospects of the aviation and aerospace sectors.

It also reflects Singapore’s commitment to safely reopen its economy and borders to the rest of the world.

 


 

Source Business Times