Search for any green Service

Find green products from around the world in one place

Africa’s shrinking lake shows the impact of climate change on women and indigenous people.

Africa’s shrinking lake shows the impact of climate change on women and indigenous people.
  • In 50 years Lake Chad has shrunk to 10th its size; climate change a factor
  • Lake vital for indigenous communities in one of the world’s poorest countries
  • Locals use ancestral knowledge to overcome problems of scarce resources

 

When Hindou Oumarou Ibrahim was a child, Lake Chad in her home country spanned 10,000 km2. These days it’s around 1,200 km2.

Climate change, rising populations and agriculture mean one of Africa’s largest water sources is now a tenth of the size it was in the 1960s.

From the Mbororo pastoralist community, Ibrahim is an expert in how indigenous peoples and particularly women adapt to climate change. She wants to highlight the impact a warming planet is having on communities across Africa.

 

“Climate change is real and it’s not about our future, it’s about our present,” she told the World Economic Forum Sustainable Development Impact Summit this year. “It’s the issue of survival. It’s not the issue of economy or power, it’s the issue of life of hundreds of millions of people that depend on it.

“We need solutions, we don’t have time. It’s now time for action and immediate action for those peoples who are getting impacted who didn’t create this climate change.”

 

Shrinking for 50 years

Lake Chad is in the Sahel, the vast semi-arid region south of the Sahara desert. The area is particularly sensitive to drought, and historically the lake has fluctuated dramatically in size during prolonged dry periods. But data from NASA Earth Observatory and others demonstrate the extent it has declined in the last half century.

 

The disappearing water in Lake Chad.
Image: Shoring Up Stability

 

More than 30 million people rely on freshwater from the lake. It also supports fishing, irrigation and economic activity both in Chad and Cameroon, Nigeria and Niger. But as the lake shrinks communities are struggling and there is competition for the dwindling resource.

In some communities men have to seek work in bigger cities during dry seasons when the lake can no longer sustain them. Internal migration is increasing, as well as people looking further afield to places such as Europe for work.

The women and children left behind have to fill the gaps and are forced to innovate to maintain food security.

 

Climate change has been linked to political instability and unrest.
Image: Shoring Up Stability

 

Across the Sahel, many farmers are reviving an old technique known as zai. They dig pits to catch rainwater, then add compost and plant seeds. The technique concentrates nutrients and can boost crop yields by up to 500%.

 

The price of global warming on Africa

Among the poorest nations in the world, Chad is already struggling with poverty and frequent conflict. Sixty-two percent of the population are destitute, according to the Multidimensional Poverty Index, and most of the country relies on subsistence farming. Climate change adds to existing political and economic instability, driving further food insecurity.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change predicts that Africa will feel the effects of temperature rise more keenly than most. Longer and more severe heat waves will have a profound impact on crop yields and the frequency of droughts.

“Around the world we have all these young people going out on the street asking for justice asking to save their futures,” said Ibrahim, “But I’m going to tell you, the young people in my community are asking for their present.”

 


 

Plastics Will Outweigh Fish in The Ocean: How Does It Affect You and What Should You Do?

Plastics Will Outweigh Fish in The Ocean: How Does It Affect You and What Should You Do?

Today, plastic constitutes approximately 90% of all trash floating on the ocean’s surface, with 46,000 pieces of plastic per square mile, and at the current accumulation rate, plastics are expected to outweigh fish by 2050.

catching plastics in the ocean

 

Did you know that the ocean produces up to 85% of the oxygen we breathe? Indeed, in every breath you take, there is a bit of the ocean. But plastic pollution threatens to destroy this life-sustaining balance.

According to the Ocean Conservancy, about 150 million metric tons of plastic already circulate in our marine environment, and an estimated 12.7 million metric tons add up to that number each year.

These synthetic molecules have already invaded our oceans, just like the everyday chemicals harming coral reefs, that’s a fact (see reef safe sunscreen). What is more shrouded in mystery is the way this plastic invasion is affecting our daily lives.

According to the University of British Columbia, the world’s oceans are now home to about 437 million tons of fish; however, this number is decreasing at an alarming rate due to multiple factors including global warming and destructive fishing operations.

At the current accumulation rate, plastics are expected to outweigh fish by 2050.

This is more than bad news. It’s an ecological crisis that threatens to affect life at large, including human lives.

top-10-rivers-polluting-oceans

What Is The Plastic Problem?

We all know we’re surrounded in plastic, but many of us fail to understand the implications of this issue.

The truth is that almost everything nowadays contains plastic, from single-use packaging to consumer goods, clothing, automotive parts, and even cosmetic products.

Much of this plastic ends up in our seas and oceans where it disintegrates into microscopic particles. But even if it breaks down into tiny bits, plastic never biodegrades. Due to its non-biodegradable nature, all plastic that has ever been produced throughout history still exists and fills up each square mile of ocean.

With the fossil fuel industry expected to increase plastic production in the next decade, global plastic pollution is becoming epidemic.

All marine and many terrestrial species are threatened, and along with them our economy and well-being too.

 

marine life being suffocated

How Does Plastics Affect The Ocean Ecosystems?

According to Plastics Europe, we produce about 335 million metric tons of plastic each year, half of which in the form of single-use plastics such as disposable plates and cutlery, straws, and water bottles.

Only about 9% of this plastic is recycled on average globally, but according to a study conducted by Science Advanced in 2017, recycling only delays the final disposal of an item.

 

mismanaged plastic waste by coastal populations

 

With this in mind, all plastics produced will eventually be discarded, and a good part of them will end up in our oceans.

Large-scale evidence of plastic pollution includes an array of animals found dead on the shores of our seas and oceans.

Examples abound, from a grey whale found dead near Seattle in 2010 with over 20 plastic bags and other trash in its stomach to a seal pup found dead on the Island of Skye with pieces of plastic wrapper in its intestine to a dead albatross found on Midway Atoll in the Pacific Ocean with plastic debris including bottle caps and a lighter in its stomach.

According to the United Nations, marine debris affects at least 800 marine species worldwide.

Fish, sea turtles, marine mammals, seabirds, but also microscopic marine organisms responsible for sustaining life in the ocean and on earth can become entangled or ingest plastic debris which can cause suffocation or death through starvation.

Humans are not immune to the threat. As plastic breaks down in tiny particles, it can end up in the seafood we eat, ultimately affecting our health.

To understand how this issue affects life on earth, we must first understand what the effects of plastic accumulation in the ocean are.

1. Alteration of the Marine Environment

The first effect of plastic pollution that can be observed is a strong alteration of the marine environment. According to research, several marine species including the blue whale, fin whale, sea lions, and various species of sea turtles, are on the verge of extinction due to plastic pollution.

Great Pacific Garbage Patch

This happens because plastic jeopardizes the natural marine ambiance, disrupting the bio-geological cycle, and threatening the existence of the whole marine ecosystem.

Some effects are more visible in areas where oceanic currents, particularly gyres, concentrate the plastic in specific areas of the ocean.

This is the case of the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, located off the coast of California. Research says this is the largest ocean garbage site in the world; an accumulation of debris almost twice the size of Texas.

While this is the largest and most famous garbage patch, there are other similar accumulations in the ocean. Some ways in which they affect the ecosystem include:

  • Entanglement: Caused majorly by lost fishing nets as well as other large plastic debris. These “ghost” nets can wrap around and trap marine animals, entangling them. Larger species like marine mammals, large fish, and sea turtles are the most endangered by ghost fishing.
  • Ingestion: Many animals may mistakenly eat plastic debris which can not only tangle their stomach or intestine but can lead to death through starvation by stopping the animals from eating real food. This could affect an array of wildlife, from seabirds to fish and even microscopic marine animals.
  • Invasion of non-native species: Many marine species including algae, crabs, and barnacles, can attach themselves to the debris and drift across the ocean with the currents. Some of these species may be invasive and can establish themselves in a new environment, overcrowding the native species, and disrupting the ecosystem.

2. Ocean Garbage Patches’ Impact On Human Health

Preliminary studies show clearly that the garbage in the ocean can be detrimental to our health – there is a significant correlation between cardiovascular disease and urine BPA levels. An accumulation of BPA in the body can also trigger type 2 diabetes.

garbabe patch as seen from underwater

 

While you might be tempted to believe that plastics pollution can only affect marine life, studies suggest these garbage patches can have a direct negative impact on human health too.

Indeed, microplastics – tiny plastic particles with a dimension of 5mm or less – have been found in some of the most important species that contribute to global fishery. This discovery poses a serious food safety concern, majorly because of the potentially toxic effects of plastics.

In fact, some plastic monomers are already known to be toxic or carcinogenic if ingested. Some plastic additives are also believed to be endocrine disrupters.

Preliminary research on the effects of microplastics on human health evidenced the possible toxicological effects and alteration of our immune response.

Some concerning impacts include an enhanced inflammatory response, disruption of the gut microbe, as well as plastic related toxicity.

Research has also demonstrated that there is a significant correlation between cardiovascular disease and urine BPA levels. An accumulation of BPA in the body can also trigger type 2 diabetes.

Further research is needed to assess the risks of dietary exposure, but these preliminary studies show clearly that the garbage in the ocean can be detrimental to our health.

3. Reduction of Atmospheric Oxygen Levels

Perhaps the greatest impact ocean plastics pollution has at a global scale is the reduction of the atmospheric oxygen levels.

In fact, the ocean is responsible for producing between 50 and 85% of the atmospheric oxygen through the photosynthetic action of phytoplankton and marine bacteria called Prochlorococcus.

Phytoplankton illustrations

 

In a study published in Communication Biology, researchers from the Macquarie University in Australia showed that exposure to plastic determines genetic alterations in the Prochlorococcus bacteria, causing it to produce less oxygen.

Phytoplankton, on the other hand, are microorganisms that live in both salt and fresh water. Like all plants, they turn carbon dioxide into oxygen, expelling the vital gas into the atmosphere.

Some species of phytoplankton include algae, dinoflagellates, and armor-plated coccolithophores.

While all phytoplankton photosynthesizes, some species also consume other microorganisms.

Microplastic can be mistakenly consumed instead of these microorganisms, or phytoplankton could ingest it as a result of consuming microscopic organisms which have previously consumed plastic microparticles.

Plastics could also affect phytoplankton’s ability to produce oxygen indirectly.

In fact, zooplankton and other marine organisms may feed on plastic, causing the death of many animals. This causes the acidification of the marine waters, altering the marine environment and subsequently causing the death of phytoplankton.

All these causes combined may lead to an important reduction of our atmospheric oxygen.

What Can You Do About It?

most common plastic objects found on European beaches

Reducing plastic waste and keeping our oceans clean is the least we can do to prevent catastrophic consequences. Here are three easy steps to manage the plastic problem.

Reduce Plastic Use 

The most obvious solution. By reducing plastic use, we can limit the number of plastics ending up in our waters. However, this is easier said than done.

There are several ways to reduce plastic use, including government legislation, manufacturers using alternative products, and individual changes.

While changing our habits may be hard, governmental incentives could help. For instance, a plastic bag tax introduced in Europe has reduced the non-biodegradable plastic bag use by about 90%.

Organizations and individuals also engaged in numerous campaigns to reduce the use of plastic water bottles and straws, especially on the beaches. However, stopping plastic use at source is the easiest way to reduce its presence.

For instance, the United States and the United Kingdom are the first states that have banned the use of plastic microbeads in cosmetic products that consumers rinse off, such as the toothpaste. While it may seem little, it’s definitely a great start to fighting plastics pollution.

Furthermore, the emergence of alternatives to plastic for some common items can also reduce the use of plastic. For example, many companies now produce biodegradable and compostable disposable plates, cups, and cutlery, biodegradable shopping bags, and the list could go on and on.

At an individual level, you can follow the tips below to reduce your plastic waste:

 

reduce plastic usage

1. Use reusable coffee cups and water bottles

Our daily coffee is a staple, but did you know that less than 1% of the disposable coffee cups can be recycled? To minimize waste, many coffee outlets now offer discounts when you bring your own cup to the shop. Some even sell reusable, eco-friendly options if you want to show off the brand. The same goes for water. Instead of drinking bottled water, buy a reusable glass or metal water flask, and refill it from the tap.

2. Give up plastic cutlery

It is estimated that an individual utilizes about 466 items of unnecessary plastic each year. Changing plastic cutlery with a biodegradable, compostable, or reusable alternative could have a huge impact in reducing plastic waste. Some manufacturers even produce edible plastic cutlery that you or the wildlife can consume.

3. Give up plastic straws

Just like plastic cutlery, plastic straws are an unnecessary item. You don’t need one to drink your soda or cocktail. Many activists even claim that governments should ban the use of plastic straws unless they are absolutely necessary (such as utilizing one for medical reasons). If you really need a straw with your drink, opt for a compostable or reusable item.

4. Give up chewing gum

Gum is not healthy for you and is potentially harmful to the environment. To begin with, chewing gum is made of plastic. Once disposed of, birds or aquatic species may believe it’s a piece of food and eat it. Luckily for those who have to chew something throughout the day, there are also plastic-free alternatives. These are potentially harmful to the environment, too, so you should limit their consumption anyway.

5. Give up the cling film

Cling wrap is often used to pack lunch or snacks. However, this material is not recyclable nor biodegradable. Instead of cling film, you could use foil, which is recyclable. Some eco-friendly alternatives include beeswax wraps made from cotton, beeswax, and other natural substances. Fully natural and environmentally friendly, they are a sustainable alternative to the common cling film.

6. Choose plastic-free teabags

Or give them up altogether. Indeed, regular teabags are sealed with plastic, which ultimately leads to microplastics accumulating into the ocean. However, you could use loose leaf tea or a plastic-free teabag to enjoy your hot drink while remaining eco-conscious.

7. Use biodegradable glitter

Beloved especially by kids; glitter is present at most parties. However, it’s made of tiny plastic particles which could end up in our food chain.

8. Opt for glass milk bottles

We know, it’s easier to grab a pint of milk packed in a plastic bottle instead of going for a glass bottle. Anyway, some shops sell milk in glass bottles while some producers may even deliver them to your home.

9. Choose your wine wisely

If you like to drink wine, ditch the plastic stopper or metal screw cap bottles. Go for wines with natural cork stoppers. Beyond the absence of plastic and ecological considerations, all wineries that respect themselves will cork their wine with a natural cork stopper. In other words, you might struggle a little to open up the bottle, but the wine inside it is higher quality and the cap will not end up polluting the ocean.

Help Clean The Trash

sorting through collected plastic debris

Since our oceans and beaches are already drowned in plastics, volunteering in social actions to clean the garbage is another important thing to do.

You could start small, by simply gathering and disposing properly of your own plastic waste.

Apps, such as Litterati or Marine Debris Tracker can also turn plastic gathering into a game and stimulate more and more people to pick up trash and dispose of it properly.

Governmental actions, such as Baltimore’s two googly-eyed machines designed to collect trash have already removed a million tons of trash from Maryland’s harbor waters. Similar concepts are also tested in Australia.

Companies also get more and more involved in the management and gathering of plastic ocean waste.

Reuse and Recycle

palau islands and reefs view

While plastic never biodegrades, reusing, and recycling it could reduce the plastic problem, at least until we find better waste management solutions.

Indeed, from solid plastic bottles and containers to reusable shopping bags made from plastic, there are many items you can buy and reuse for decades. Most of these products are BPA-free, so they are also safe to use by children.

Many companies have also started to get involved in the recycling process. Unifi, for example, is a clothes manufacturer that turns plastic bottles into yarn. Adidas followed suit, launching a line of running shoes made out of recycled plastic.

These examples show that there is hope in stopping – or at least limiting – plastic pollution, so we can save our planet.

With plastics threatening to outweigh the fish in the ocean, the situation can easily get out of hand and result in a catastrophe. Gathering all garbage from the waters is hard, but all it takes is a small behavioral change to reduce the accumulation of waste.

The future of this planet, the wellbeing of our wildlife, and ultimately our wellbeing as a species is in our hands. 

Whether you decide to use less plastic items or not is down to you, but remember that using plastics and disposing of them improperly could mean much more than a dead fish or seagull. It could potentially mean our extinction.


Thank you and credit to https://www.snorkelsandfins.com/

Successful carbon removal depends on these 3 conditions.

Successful carbon removal depends on these 3 conditions.

There is now more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere than at any time in the past 400,000 years, with carbon dioxide levels exceeding an unprecedented 400 parts per million.

The pace of carbon emissions has become such a problem that even if we can meet the carbon reduction targets set out in the 2016 Paris Agreement, global temperatures will likely rise above 1.5˚C by 2030 – which will increase the risks and impacts of droughts, floods, extreme heat, and poverty for hundreds of millions of people.

Fortunately, growing international pressure over the past decade has led to the development of solutions for tackling our carbon emissions problem. One category of these solutions is known as negative emission technologies (NETs), which focus on removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.

These carbon-removal solutions may be critical in our fight against climate change, but they need to meet certain conditions to effectively curb carbon emissions.

 

Ensuring long-term capture and storage of carbon removed

Professor Howard J. Herzog, Senior Research Engineer at the MIT Energy Initiative and leading expert on carbon capture and storage, says: “the best way to keep carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere is not putting it there in the first place”. There is truth in this when you consider how difficult it is recapturing and storing carbon dioxide for the long term, when it has already been emitted.

Nature provides the simplest carbon removal solution – planting more trees. This is an effective solution depending on how well the land is managed to protect from deforestation and natural disasters. If not protected, trees may only store carbon for hundreds of years, compared to the thousands of years needed to slow climate change.

Alternatively, technologists have found ways to burn biomass containing naturally recaptured carbon dioxide and use the energy released to pump the carbon dioxide underground for long-term storage. Known technically as Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS), this technology is promising but requires suitable rock formations such as basalt and forsterite to react with the carbon dioxide to avoid leakage.

Carbon Upcycling Technologies, an innovative startup founded by Apoorv Sinha, is combining carbon dioxide with fine particles such as fly ash, graphite, talc and olivine to produce solid nanoparticles that can be used for a range of material solutions. In 2017, Carbon Upcycling Technologies used its nanoparticles to create a corrosion-resistant coating, locking carbon away and generating revenues in the process.

 

Reducing carbon removal costs and meeting carbon storage capacities

The cost and storage capacity limits of removing carbon differ depending on the solution. Planting trees is arguably the cheapest and most natural way to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, but its storage capacity is limited by the available land and impacted by deforestation.

Similarly to how solar power requires sunshine, carbon removal solutions also require certain conditions to work effectively. If certain conditions are not met, the full carbon capture capacity of these technologies cannot be realized.

2017 Michigan study optimistically suggests that carbon removal solutions have the potential to mitigate 37 gigatons of carbon dioxide per year, where annual emissions are roughly 38 gigatons of carbon dioxide per year. However, even if this were the case, reaching this storage potential would require a portfolio of solutions with carbon capture costs lower than traditional storage or emissions. Technological solutions are making progress – but investment and time are still required to reduce carbon removal costs and to scale-up the adoption of these solutions.

A Swiss-company, Climeworks, has constructed a plant which extracts carbon dioxide directly from the air using a filter and chemical process, storing carbon dioxide as a concentrate. Technologies like these are known as Direct Air Carbon Capture and Storage (DACCS). Despite the novelty of this idea, Climeworks’ plant in Italy can only capture up to 150 tons of carbon dioxide per year from the atmosphere, equivalent to taking just 32 cars off the road. Combined with high capital and carbon removal costs, solutions like these alone are not sufficient.

 

Reducing the market and technology risks of carbon removal solutions

Most carbon removal solutions are still in development, and it may take years for them to commercialize. The pathway to commercialization requires large investments into research and development without guarantees of financial return. This may not fit the risk profiles of many traditional investors or funders, limiting the available funds for the development of new solutions.

Cyclotron Road, an early-stage funder and incubator, provides grant and investment capital to innovative hard-tech social enterprises. Robert Ethier, a former investment director for Cyclotron Road, says this capital is “to help them reduce market and technology risk [and] accelerate them to commercialization [by] leveraging programmes and partners”.

At an early stage, risk-tolerant patient capital, invested into the right social entrepreneurs and provided with the right business and industry support, is critical to speed up the development of carbon removal solutions. This means that funders with higher risk tolerance – such as incubators, accelerators, philanthropists, international agencies, governments, academic institutions and angel investors – have a critical role to play a in providing the capital needed to commercialize carbon removal technologies.

 

So what?

There is a growing portfolio of carbon removal technologies, including those gifted by nature. Although in different stages of development, carbon removal solutions have the potential to serve as a necessary defense against pending climate catastrophe, but cannot serve as an insurance policy for the carbon dioxide we are emitting, and will emit.

Carbon removal technologies must be combined with other solutions and global efforts to reduce global carbon emissions. However, knowing that there are nascent solutions available should motivate the development, cost-reduction and scaling-up of these solutions. The future of the world depends on it.

 


 

The Netherlands is building ‘solar islands’ to fight rising sea levels.

The Netherlands is building ‘solar islands’ to fight rising sea levels.
  • 15 islands, made up of more than 70,000 solar panels are being built in the Netherlands
  • The sun-tracking panels face the sun all day, so they’re able to absorb more energy

The famous poem “No Man is an Island” – meaning no one is completely self-sufficient – has resonated with Western society since the 17th century. But what if a man is an island comprised of solar panels? The odds of survival would be much higher.

In the Netherlands, the largest solar panel island project to date is currently being developed. Set to consist of 15 islands on the Andijk Reservoir in North Holland, 15 floating solar islands, containing 73,500 panels, will be the first sun-tracking islands of this size in the world.

Arnoud Vandruten, managing director of Floating Solar, a solar panel supplier of the project says the islands are in the engineering phase and will be put into the water in September, October, and November of this year. It’s no coincidence that this adaptation was born in the Netherlands, as people there already live below sea level.

 

Why on the water?

“We can fight the rising of the sea level in the Netherlands with building even higher dikes or living on the water,” says Vandruten. “So that is the reason why we changed our focus from putting solar panels on rooftops and land to water. We adapt by moving the energy supply from land to the rising water. We can also experiment with moving complete housing districts to the water, while being energy positive or at least neutral.”

Because the sun-tracking panels face the sun all day they’re able to absorb more energy. Additionally, being on water provides useful dynamics that aren’t possible on land.

“You have to make the system flexible so it can adapt to the energy of the waves and at the same time the panels can act as sails,” says Vandruten. “Because we can turn the island with the sun, the other advantage is you can put an island in such a position that it’s not harmed by the wind.”

Solar panel islands are also being built in Japan, China, Chile and the UK. Ramez Naam, Co-Chair of Energy and Environment at Singularity University, says that ultimately, cost savings and scarcity of land or water are what will drive the floating solar trend forward and bring more governments on board.

“Where land is scarce like in Japan, solar on reservoirs is a great way to deploy it in an area that otherwise couldn’t be used,” explains Naam. “When water cools down, the solar panels increases their efficiency and they then actually produce more electricity. Plus, solar over water can reduce evaporation losses from those reservoirs, ponds, canals and so on.”

Naam added that the price of solar electricity has dropped dramatically.

“In sunny parts of the world, solar is now just plain cheaper than coal or gas electricity,” he says.” In some places, building new solar or even new wind is cheaper or is about to be cheaper than continuing to operate on existing coal and gas.”

 


 

Trump claims climate change is important to him!

Trump claims climate change is important to him!

United States president Donald Trump has described climate change as important to him, saying clean air and clean water were top of his environmental agenda.

“Climate change is very important to me,” the US president said, speaking at a press conference ahead of NATO’s 70th-anniversary summit in London yesterday. “I believe very strongly in very crystal-clear, clean water and clean air. That’s a big part of climate change.”

Asked whether he was not concerned about rising seas, Trump changed the subject, saying he was “also concerned about nuclear proliferation.”

Notorious for his attempts to mock global warming and international mitigation efforts, Trump has often demonstrated a lack of knowledge and awareness on climate change, which denotes a long-term change in the earth’s climate with impacts on average weather conditions, encompassing changes in temperature, shifts in precipitation, increased likelihood of severe weather events.

When severe cold and record amounts of snow swept across the nation’s east coast two years ago, the president confused weather with climate, calling for global warming to counteract the icy temperatures.

Trump once even dismissed climate change as a hoax created by the Chinese to destroy American jobs.

Two years ago, Trump announced he would remove the United States—the world’s second-largest emitter of greenhouse gases—from the Paris Agreement signed and ratified by Obama, citing concerns that the accord aimed at cutting greenhouse gas emissions could undermine the nation’s economy.

In April this year, his administration followed through on Trump’s statement of intent, beginning the formal process of withdrawing from the climate deal.

The US’ original emissions reduction pledge set down in the accord accounted for a fifth of the global emissions to be avoided by 2030. This means the nation’s absence from international efforts to cut carbon emissions would help push the global temperature rise to well beyond 2C.

Trump has made a name for himself as a vigorous opponent to environmental protection, steadily rolling back conservation laws implemented by the previous administration, including pollution regulations for drilling companiesrules protecting wetlands and streams, and other regulations on air pollution, toxic substances and the safeguarding of endangered species.

Last year, the US’ carbon emissions saw the largest spike in years, driven by the nation’s soaring power demand, growing fuel consumption and increased air travel.

Experts have pointed out that climate change will hurt the American economy, put society at risk and threaten national security, with wildfires, extreme heat, droughts and coastal flooding expected to cause growing losses to infrastructure and impede economic growth, particularly in regions dependent on tourism and agriculture, according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Some of the nation’s biggest cities, including New York, Miami and Boston, rank among those vulnerable to coastal flooding as sea levels rise. In New York alone, over 400,000 people are projected to be at risk of being affected by rising seas by 2050.

At yesterday’s press conference, Trump also voiced his concerns over plastic pollution, which is already impacting marine life off the country’s coast, saying “certain countries are dumping unlimited loads of things in the ocean.”

A recent report revealed the US to be the biggest driver of the world’s waste crisis. The country generates 12 per cent of global municipal waste—three times the global average—but adequately recycles only 35 per cent, the study showed.

 


 

By Tim Daubach

www.eco-business.com

Got eco anxiety? Here are 10 reasons for climate optimism.

Got eco anxiety? Here are 10 reasons for climate optimism.

Last week, a report from the World Meteorological Organisation found that the world is warming faster than previously believed, and could warm by between three to five degrees Celsius by the end of the century—that’s almost three times the goal set by the Paris climate agreement.

But amid the doom and gloom, there are reasons for us to be optimistic. Even Assaad Razzouk, the outspoken chief executive of Singapore-based renewables firm Sindicatum, has started to believe there is hope for the planet. On his podcast Angry Clean Energy Guy, recorded on Thursday, Razzouk highlighted 10 reasons for climate optimism. Those reasons are as follows:

 

Climate action is intensifying

The corporate response to climate change is growing ever stronger, and governments are finally responding too, prompted by a global upswell in climate activism.

“Do you think the point of the Extinction Rebellion protests is to close roads? Or that Greta Thunberg travels by boat because she wants to save fuel? Of course not. The point is to increase awareness about the climate emergency. And, boy, have they been successful,” said Razzouk on his podcast.

 

Cost reductions [of renewables] have basically taken fossil fuel power out of the game. It’s just that some countries don’t know that yet.
Assaad Razzouk, chief executive, Sindicatum Sustainable Resources

 

Among the big corporates to think harder about reducing their impact are Kellogg’s, the cereal company, which aims to train 500,000 American farmers in techniques that lower greenhouse gas emissions, and the big tech giants Facebook, Google and Apple, which want to only use renewables to power their energy-guzzling data centres.

In Southeast Asia, the only region in the world where coal is growing in the energy mix, the regional bloc’s three biggest banks, UOB, DBS and OCBC, all declared in an unprecedented 11 days for corporate climate action in May that they would all stop funding new coal-fired power plants.

As for consumers, the demand for green products is another reason for the eco anxious to quit the Xanax. According to study by market research group Nielsen, a quarter of all store sales in the United States will be from sustainable products by 2021.

Meanwhile, governments including Ireland, the United Kingdom, California and the European Union, which recently declared a state of climate emergency, have taken bold leaps to curb emissions. In Asia Pacific, the leader is New Zealand. The government has passed a law to cut carbon emissions to almost zero by 2050, go 100 per cent renewables by 2035, plant one billion trees and invest $15 billion in transit, biking and walking infrastructure.

Oil and gas cost of capital is rising

The cost of capital for oil and gas is growing, which has meant that the market value of America’s energy sector not only fell this year, but the whole sector is now worth less than Apple’s stock, Razzouk said.

He pointed to the downgrading of the credit rating of Exxon Mobil, one of the world’s biggest (mostly oil) energy companies, as a result of the rising cost of gas extraction, and the nose-dive in market value of fracking giant Chesapeake over the last decade (down 98 per cent), as signs that the era of fossil fuels dominance is coming to an end.

“Over the next few years, Big Oil will find it increasingly hard and increasingly expensive to finance new projects,” said Razzouk.

Renewables costs are still falling

The costs for renewable energy tech fell to a record low last year, according to the International Renewable Energy Agency, with the biggest fall in solar, down by 26 per cent.

Razzouk pointed to bids to build solar parks in Dubai, which have seen costs plummet by 71 per cent in five years, and a 31 per cent fall in the cost of offshore wind—now the cleanest and cheapest baseload power in the world—in the UK in two years, as evidence that costs are continuing to fall for clean energy.

“These cost reductions have basically taken fossil fuel power out of the game. It’s just that some countries don’t know that yet,” said Razzouk.

Transport is going electric—fast

The number of public charging points for electric vehicles has increased five-fold in four years, from less than 200,000 in 2015 to 1m in 2019, the price of lithium-ion batteries has fallen by 87 per cent in a decade, and cities are being redesigned away for electric vehicles, Razzouk noted.

And automative manufacturers have finally caught on. According to Razzouk’s calculations, 84 models are being rolled out over the next two years from the likes of Volkswagen (VW), Audi, Porsche, Mercedes, Ford, Toyota, Honda, Nissan, Range Rover and Jaguar, and automakers such as BMW, VW, General Motors and Peugeot are now offering electric scooters and electric bicycles, not just cars.

 

We are winning [the climate fight]. For now, slowly, slowly, but soon we’re going to be winning all of a sudden.

 

“The transition to electric cars would have been a lot less painful for the car industry if it had spent the last decade preparing for it instead of fighting it. So today they’re laying off people when they shouldn’t have, had they been thinking.”

But the electric mobility revolution is not just about cars. Taiwanese electric bicycle firm Giant is selling 600,000 units a year, while there are 100 different electric planes in development.

Perhaps most promising of all is that new technology enables electric vehicles to supply energy back to the grid, rather than suck from it.

“There’s an emerging technology called vehicle-to-grid (V2G), and that allows a plug-in vehicle to act as a form of energy storage. So the batteries in your car can be used to let electricity flow from the car to the distribution network and back,” Razzouk said.

Climate litigation

According to Columbia Law School, there are 1,640 lawsuits fighting fossil fuel companies and governments over climate change right now.

“Even though we are in a planetary emergency, we are fighting back,” said Razzouk, who noted that climate lawsuits are exposing the “misinformation and obfuscation” of Big Oil, which has long known of the impact of their operations on the climate.

“The wheels of justice are slow and sadly, justice maybe cannot be guaranteed to prevail in some countries, but the sheer number of lawsuits and the dedication, commitment, and passion I’ve seen from those launching them is a big cause for optimism,” Razzouk said.

Banks are waking up to the climate reality

Beyond credit ratings agency Moody’s considering stripping Exxon Mobil of its triple-A rating, the European Central Bank is considering including climate considerations in how it conducts its monetary policy. “Now that would be a huge move because central banks are by far the biggest influence on financial markets,” said Razzouk.

Monetary policies, Razzouk explained, have an implicit “carbon bias” because carbon exposure is almost irrelevent for normal credit ratings. If that changed, financial markets would stop mispricing climate risks—which would be a huge lever for change, he said.

The war on plastic

A report from the International Energy Agency, released in October 2018, found that plastic and other petrochemicals are becoming the biggest driver of global oil demand—ahead of cars, planes and trucks—and will make up nearly half of oil demand by 2050.

But the global fight against plastic pollution could put a big dent in oil demand, Razzouk said.

This drop in demand will have consequences for the cost of capital of oil and gas companies. This means that they will be able to do no more new oil and gas exploration and close down, gradually, Razzouk suggested.

Reforestation

Though forest fires have raged in Indonesia, the Amazon, California and Australia this year, many countries around the world are building forest fortresses to lock in carbon and safeguard water resources, and there are now more protected nature and marine areas than at any time in history.

China, India and Pakistan are rolling out massive tree-planting schemes, Ethiopia recently planted 350 million trees in a single day as part of an initiative to plant four billion trees, and in Western Europe, forests have grown by an area larger than Switzerland in a decade.

Peak emissions

After increasing at the fastest rate for seven years in 2018, global carbon emissions are set to rise much more slowly this year, according to data from the Global Carbon Project.

The global economy grew by 3.5 percent per year, but emissions grew by only 0.8 per cent per year, Razzouk pointed out. “Now that’s still a disaster because they [emissions] are growing. But the growth phase is slower. We’ve seen a 1.5 per cent increase in 2017, 2.1 per cent in 2018 and now it’s dropped to 0.8 per cent.”

“One more push by all of us, and we will set off on a downward slope for emissions,” he said.

Citizen activism

Even just a year ago, it couldn’t reasonably be believed that much of the world really cared about the climate crisis, Razzouk said.

Now though, he said, he sees much more commitment to tackle the climate emergency.

“We have activist lawyers, activist teachers, activist unionists, activist engineers, activist consultants, and activist politicians. We even have some activist bankers. We even have some activist oil and gas professionals working at changing the oil and gas fat cats from the inside. And most important of all, we have activist citizens everywhere I look.”

Clilmate solutions are available, and slowly but surely, they are being implemented, and soon they will be as ubiquitous as our mobile phones, he said.

“We are winning [the climate fight]. For now, slowly, slowly, but soon we’re going to be winning all of a sudden,” said  Razzouk, who started his podcast by declaring that a friend recently unfollowed him on Twitter, because he found his tweets to be “too depressing.”

Singapore-based renewables executive Assaad Razzouk is the creator of the Angry Clean Energy Guy podcast series, and has 137,000 followers of his environment-themed Twitter account.

 


 

By Robin Hicks

www.eco-business.com

BLOND:ISH: The DJ who wants zero-plastic shows

BLOND:ISH: The DJ who wants zero-plastic shows

It was the end of one of the biggest shows of DJ Vivie-Ann Bakos’ life, but she felt like something wasn’t quite right.

“I was playing at Warung in Brazil, one of the most iconic clubs in the world,” Vivie, who performs as BLOND:ISH, tells Radio 1 Newsbeat.

“At the end of the night you get a beautiful sunrise… but I could see cleaners coming out and picking up a mountain of plastic like robots.

“That juxtaposition made me think, ‘I need to do something about this’.”

 

Vivie-Ann Bakos
Image copyright: LYDIA LAWS PR

 

It was there that her zero-plastic initiative, Bye Bye Plastic was born.

The aim of the scheme is for venues to stop using single-use plastics like straws, cups and bottles.

The first steps include encouraging artists to ask for “eco-riders” at shows and offering promoters a hotline service to get advice on the alternatives to using plastics.

A rider is a list of items musicians and artists ask for backstage at their shows.

Although Vivie-Ann admits “nothing’s going to change overnight” she’s adamant the scheme is realistic.

“Even though it seems like a huge task doesn’t mean it’s an impossible one.

“We’re like the babysitter of the music industry. We’ve done a lot of the research for venues and can help hold their hands through the process.

“Through small, actionable steps we can change this… it’s a lot less overwhelming than it might seem to those on the outside.

“When I’m not doing music I’m talking about waste now – I had no idea this was my future.”

 

Coachella 2019
Image copyright:GETTY IMAGES
Image caption: BLOND:ISH recently performed at Coachell

Speaking ahead of a panel on dance music’s impact on the environment hosted by Newsbeat at the Brighton Music Conference, Vivie-Ann explains her recent performance at Coachella spurred her on.

“Unless I was bringing it up I don’t think a lot of people were talking about the plastic issue backstage.

“But when I did bring it up – agents, managers and DJs were super-excited to get on board and adopt the idea.

“I don’t know all the answers but I’m actively asking everyone about the topic.”

 

Vivie-Ann doing a beach clean
Image copyright: LYDIA LAWS PR
Image caption: Vivie-Ann takes part in beach-cleans as part of her initiative

The DJ reminds promoters about the scheme “every time” she’s booked for a show, no matter how big or small.

It’s all part of her outlook that a “generational shift” is needed around attitudes towards plastics at shows so that future headliners and event organisers can help “solve the issue”.

“It’s not easy to enforce… I wouldn’t go as far to refuse a gig because I like to come with the advocate over activist approach.

“This is a relevant conversation to be had and any time I’ve spoken about it, the conversation goes in a positive way.

“Millennials want to be attached to causes and purpose-driven missions and this is one they can do that with.”

 


 

Follow Newsbeat on InstagramFacebookTwitter and YouTube.