Search for any green Service

Find green products from around the world in one place

How can corporates help forge a greener and fairer future of work?

How can corporates help forge a greener and fairer future of work?

This year’s Ricoh Eco Action Day Forum will gather leaders from the worlds of business, government and civil society to explore ways to drive inclusive growth while sustaining the environment for generations to come.

The Covid-19 pandemic has dealt a heavy blow to the world of work. As nations continue to grapple with the short-term impacts of the economic slowdown, many have yet to grasp the imprint that the crisis may have left on the future of labour markets.

Lockdowns have sped up existing trends in remote work, e-commerce, and automation, upending forecasts of what tomorrow’s economy will look like. In the years ahead, it is estimated that 25 per cent more workers will potentially need to switch occupations than previously thought.

With such dramatic change come challenges, particularly for the world’s most vulnerable. Last year’s economic crash left more than 114 million people without jobs, but the United Nations (UN) estimates that a staggering 1.6 billion workers in the informal economy risk losing their livelihoods.

As the pandemic-induced inequality gap keeps widening, this underlines the importance for countries to build back better as they emerge from the worst recession facing the world since the great depression.

If governments are to create a fairer future, the UN’s Sustainable Development Goal 8, focused on achieving decent work and economic growth, will need to be front and centre of the global economic recovery. The question is, what’s the role of businesses in realising this vision?

This year’s Ricoh Eco Action Day Forum will seek answers to this question. Themed ‘The Future of Work’, the event will explore how companies can help policymakers make economic growth sustainable and inclusive, and offer productive employment and decent work for all.

Taking place on 26 August, the event will bring together business leaders, sustainability experts and government representatives to discuss the business models that firms can adopt to build better and safer workplaces while driving sustainability outcomes.

The gathering, which is co-organised by Japanese multinational digital services company Ricoh and Eco-Business, also ties in with Singapore’s wider push towards sustainability as the new engine for jobs and growth, encouraging more entrepreneurs, banks and industry to transition towards greener ways of doing business.

Coming on the heels of the recently unveiled Singapore Green Plan 2030, which charts a new course for Singapore’s sustainability agenda, the event will delve into the ways firms can create green jobs, buildings, and infrastructure to help transform how people live and work in support of the city-state’s sustainability commitments.

 

It is important for business, government and sustainability experts to come together and discuss how we can achieve a sustainable and inclusive recovery post-Covid, and create decent, inclusive and sustainable work for all. – Ben Chong, managing director, Ricoh Singapore

 

“The pandemic has disproportionately impacted those with limited digital access, lower skills and education, and who are of lower income. As countries enforced lockdowns and shuttered economies, these communities have been less able to continue studying and working from home, thus widening the social and economic inequality gaps,” said Ben Chong, managing director at Ricoh Singapore.

“As such, it is important for business, government and sustainability experts to come together and discuss how we can achieve a sustainable and inclusive recovery post-Covid, and create decent, inclusive and sustainable work for all,” he said.

“While it takes collaborative efforts to overcome inequity, the onus is on companies to ensure safe and fair work conditions for their employees,” he continued. Besides putting measures in place to curb the spread of the virus, this means using technology to remove barriers and ensure fair treatment and equal access to opportunities for everyone, he added.

Covid-19 has highlighted how dependent the global economy has become on digital technology. As the world emerges from the crisis, the shift in work patterns is likely to keep driving the surge in demand for digital services, said Chong.

“As the world recovers from the pandemic, we are slowly but surely returning to the office. However, the next generation of workers will require more flexibility in terms of working hours and ways of working,” he observed.

“As a digital services company, we are empowering businesses and their employees to work better and smarter with secure, innovative digital office tools and technologies so they can work seamlessly wherever they are,” he said.

The Ricoh Eco Action Day Forum is one of Singapore’s key sustainability gatherings. It is part of Ricoh’s larger Eco Action Day Campaign, which encourages individuals and organisations in Singapore to embrace a greener future.

 


 

Source Eco Business

The global energy landscape is going through major shifts

The global energy landscape is going through major shifts

We publish this long-term energy outlook at the start of 2021, after a year that has brought extraordinary challenges. The COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent economic crisis caused unprecedented disruption in the energy landscape—and the path to recovery remains uncertain.

At the same time, the world’s energy systems are going through rapid transitions that are triggered by simultaneous shifts in technological development, regulations, consumer preferences, and investor sentiments. Our Reference Case sheds light on these developments and provides a synthesis on how energy demand will evolve.

 

In the short term, a return to pre-COVID-19 levels is projected in one to four years

The impacts of COVID-19 have permanently shifted energy-demand curves. Although demand rebounds to 2019 levels in one to four years, it does not return to the previous growth path. Electricity and gas rebound more quickly than oil demand, and coal does not return to pre-COVID-19 demand levels.

Recent work by McKinsey on the effects of the COVID-19 crisis on economic growth introduces a set of scenarios, reflecting varying levels of effectiveness of the public-health response and speed and strength of policy interventions.

From these scenarios, two were selected as most likely outcomes by a group of more than 2,000 executive respondents globally: “Virus Contained; growth returns” and “Muted Recovery.” At the time of this report’s publication
(January 2021), the latest actual numbers show a trajectory that comes closest to “Virus Contained; growth returns.” Consequently, this scenario underlies the projections in our report.

Given the unparalleled size of many economic-recovery packages, the focus of the stimulus measures plays a key role in shaping energy systems in the decades to come.

 

Source: Mckinsey

 

 

Source: Mckinsey

 

 

Source: Mckinsey

 

 

Source: McKinsey

 

 

In the longer term, fundamental shifts already emerging pre-COVID-19 are going to be the key drivers of the energy transition

As economies and energy markets recover from the short-term impact of COVID-19, fundamental shifts in the energy system continue, and the coming decades will likely see a rapid acceleration of the energy transition.

 

 

 

 

 

Power wins and hydrogen changes the landscape . . .

Power consumption doubles by 2050 as energy demand electrifies, wealth increases, and green hydrogen picks up momentum.

 

. . . and low-cost renewables dominate power markets

Renewables become cheaper than existing fossil plants within the next decade. This triggers a sharp uptake in the installed capacity of solar photovoltaics and onshore and offshore wind (5 TW of new solar and wind capacity installed by 2035—which is equivalent to fivefold growth).

 

Peaks in fossil-fuel demand keep coming closer

Projected peaks in demand for hydrocarbons have come forward. Oil demand peaks in 2029 and gas in 2037, whereas coal shows a steady decline.

Yet in the Reference Case fossil fuels continue to play a major role in the energy system by 2050, driven by growth in areas such as chemicals and aviation.

In the Accelerated Transition scenario, demand for fossil fuels continues to decline, particularly oil and coal. Peak oil demand could move forward by five years to the early 2020s, at a level less than 1 MMB/D above 2019 levels.

 

Source: McKinsey

 

After a long period of growth, global liquids demand peaks in the late 2020s, followed by a 10% decline in demand by 2050. This is mainly driven by slowing car-park growth, enhanced engine efficiency in road transport, and increased electrification.

Global coal demand peaked in 2014 and continues to decline by almost 40% from 2019 to 2050. Under increasing regulatory and financial pressure, coal’s role in the power sector diminishes, contributing to the overall decline in demand.

Gas continues to increase its share of global energy demand in the next ten to 15 years—the only fossil fuel to do so—and then peaks in the late 2030s. Even in the Reference Case, gas demand in 2050 is 5% higher than today.

 

Source: McKinsey

 


 

Source McKinsey

From pre-loved fashion to shopping local: 5 ways lockdown has encouraged sustainable living

From pre-loved fashion to shopping local: 5 ways lockdown has encouraged sustainable living

Over the past year, the coronavirus pandemic has transformed the way we live, impacting everything from how we work to how we socialize.

One of the few positive results of the pandemic has been that many people have become more aware of their carbon footprints. In April 2020, an Ipsos survey found that 71 percent of people in 14 countries felt that climate change was as serious a crisis as the pandemic. In July 2020, a survey by green energy provider Bulb found that more than a third of the UK public were living more sustainably during the shutdown. Meanwhile, an American survey conducted by the Boston Consultancy Group at the same time found that 70 percent of people were more aware of their environmental impacts than before.

“I think a lot of people at home have a new appreciation for nature and its local environment,” a WWF spokesperson told The Independent . WWF Executive Director Tanya Steele adds that this year marks the beginning of a “critical decade” when it comes to taking action against the climate crisis. “It has never been more important for people to use their voice, their own power, to defend nature and show leaders why they should care,” she says.

It goes without saying that spending more time outdoors can have a huge impact on one’s relationship with the environment. “One of the things we’ve all noticed is the importance of our green spaces,” Environment Minister Rebecca Pow told The Independent . “I am encouraged to see that more and more people are using them to connect with nature, which is beneficial for physical and mental health.”

The environmental benefits of the blockade have also been evident. In April, reports emerged of wild animals emerging from their hiding places and roaming the suddenly empty streets. Dolphins were suddenly spotted off Boshprosu, Istanbul, one of the world’s busiest sea lanes, while wild boars roamed the streets of Haifa, Israel. Closer to home, reports noted a significant increase in bat, bee and squirrel sightings in 2020 in the UK compared to the previous year.

Other benefits were seen in the form of reports that air pollution had decreased by record amounts in countries around the world.

But how did we become more sustainable as individuals during the confinement? And can we continue like this once the restrictions are lifted? These are the climate lessons we learned during the confinement.

 

Changing our diets

It’s no secret that moving toward a more plant-based diet can have a hugely positive impact on the environment. Not only did roughly 14 percent of all greenhouse gas emissions from human activities come from livestock, but a study published in Science in 2018 that listed the environmental impact of 40 top foods found that the top nine were all products. of animal origin.

A few weeks after the first shutdown, reports emerged that millions of Britons were cutting back on meat and dairy , while supermarkets reported an increase in demand for vegan products. Meanwhile, The Vegan Society found that one in five Britons have reduced their meat consumption during the pandemic, while 15 percent have reduced their dairy consumption. Then, in January 2021, the organization’s month-long annual vegan commitment, Veganuary, reported its highest number of sign-ups: 500,000.

There are several reasons why people might have been drawn to veganism in the confinement. “For some, it is because their usual food options were not available at the supermarket, for others it has been a cost-saving exercise,” a spokesperson for The Vegan Society told The Independent.

“However, I think more than anything else, the pandemic has put health at the forefront of people’s minds and we have suddenly become much more aware of what we are eating, where it comes from and how it makes us feel.” .

“Consumers are becoming more conscientious and ethical shoppers with many interested in seeking cruelty-free and plant-based alternatives.”

 

We stop traveling

The pandemic has put an end to international travel for most of the past year.

Massive flight grounding during 2020 reduced aviation’s CO2 emissions by about 60 percent, according to the Global Carbon Project .

Instead of traveling abroad in search of warmer climates, Brits embraced home vacations during the summer months, and a luxury accommodation specialist, Hoseasons, reported a new booking every 11 seconds in June after the first Minister lifted restrictions on overnight stays. Meanwhile, Hoseasons sister company cottages.com reported a 455 percent increase in year-on-year bookings.

But beyond the holidays, due to restrictions that required Brits to stay within their local areas, we also stopped using trains and cars to get around so much, instead favoring walking and cycling: bicycle sales increased by 63 percent during the confinement.

As a result, in London, traffic pollution was reduced by as much as 50 percent during the first blockade, according to a study . Meanwhile, data from the London Air Quality Network, run by King’s College London , found that air pollution dropped substantially in UK cities in March 2020.

Professor Alastair Lewis, from the National Center for Atmospheric Sciences at the University of York, explained at the time: “This is primarily a consequence of lower traffic volumes, and some of the clearest reductions have been in nitrogen dioxide, which mainly comes from the vehicle’s exhaust. ”

 

Eat more at home

With the hospitality industry shut down for much of 2020, Brits ate at home more than ever. While this has resulted in a major economic hit to the industry, cooking and eating more at home has some environmental benefits. In other words, it gives you more control over food waste prevention, which the nonprofit Friends of the Earth cites as one of the biggest problems regarding the environmental impact of our food.

Friends of the Earth estimates that more than 10 million tonnes of food is disposed of in the UK each year. And many of the things people can do to combat this come from eating more at home – recycling their own food waste, composting, and using leftovers. You can read more about food waste prevention here .

Plus, eating at home gives you more control over where you get your ingredients from. This means that you can choose to buy seasonal products that have been sourced locally rather than those that have been brought in from abroad, further reducing your carbon footprint.

Data from the shopping intelligence platform Cardlytics also found that meal kits and grocery boxes saw great growth in sales during the pandemic – spending on DIY meal kit companies, including Hello Fresh, Gousto and Mindful Chef, grew 114% in April 2020 compared to the previous year, also reducing food waste as the kits provide consumers with the exact amount of ingredients needed for a particular recipe.

We have yet to see if the pandemic will have a lasting impact on whether we eat more at home, but Mintel research found that more than half (55 percent) of people are already planning to cook at home more after COVID-19 in compared to before.

 

Buy less and favor your favorite fashion

One of the many ways we have become more sustainable is through our fashion choices. In 2020, clothing sales fell 25 percent, marking the biggest drop in 23 years, according to ONS figures . This is not surprising considering we had so few opportunities to socialize last year and nonessential retail was closed for much of 2020.

However, some of us looked online for our fashion solution, and when we did, we regularly opted for pre-loved clothing. In 2020, second-hand shopping app Depop saw a 200 percent year-on-year traffic increase, and its turnover doubled globally since April 1. Meanwhile, eBay reported that it had sold 1,211 percent more used items in June 2020 compared to 2018, noting a further increase of 195,691 percent in second-hand designer fashion sales at the same time.

Another eco-friendly fashion habit that emerged over the last year is DIY fashion. Remember the TikTok crochet trend that emerged last year as a result of people trying to recreate the JW Anderson multi-colored cardigan worn by Harry Styles? How could you forget? It proved so popular that Anderson himself eventually released the pattern so that people could recreate the exact cardigan at home. “Crafts flourish when people get stuck at home,” Abby Glassenberg, president and co-founder of the Craft Industry Alliance , previously told The Independent.

 

Participation in local community groups

Another way the pandemic has made us more sustainable is simply because more people are joining local community groups that are dedicated to fighting the climate crisis. Speaking to The Independent , Friends of the Earth says they have noticed a significant increase in the number of people joining local groups.

Alasdair Roxburgh, Director of Communities and Networks for Friends of the Earth, told The Independent: “The biggest and most important change we have seen in environmental action over the past year is how people have come together in their communities to support one another.

“In just over a year since we launched them, there are now 250 Climate Action Groups in communities across the country. The incredible work done by mutual aid groups, councils, local businesses and more showed the power and speed of change that can occur when communities work together at the local level. This has definitely translated into action against the climate crisis. ”

You can see the full list of the nonprofit’s Climate Action Groups on their website , which has a tool that allows you to type in your zip code and find the one closest to you. Different groups have different priorities.

For example, in Newcastle, a group has petitioned the government for safe cycling, and in Newbury, they are campaigning for paper bags at their local Tesco. Meanwhile, in Ilkley, a group is campaigning for local people to switch to banks that don’t invest in fossil fuels.

 


 

Source The Independent

UK is now halfway to meeting its ‘net-zero emissions’ target

UK is now halfway to meeting its ‘net-zero emissions’ target

Ahead of the United Kingdom hosting the COP26 UN climate summit in November, the nature of the decline in 2020 shows how challenging it will be for the country to eliminate its remaining emissions.

The UK’s greenhouse gas emissions in 2020 were 51 per cent below 1990 levels, according to new Carbon Brief analysis. This means the UK is now halfway to meeting its target of “net-zero” emissions by 2050.

The milestone was reached after a record-breaking 11 per cent fall in greenhouse gas emissions in 2020, largely due to the coronavirus pandemic. Emissions are likely to rebound this year or next as the economy recovers.

The nature of the decline in 2020 shows how challenging it will be for the UK to eliminate its remaining emissions. It also illustrates the progress made so far, ahead of the UK hosting the COP26 UN climate summit in November.

Here, Carbon Brief sets out what contributed to the fall in emissions in 2020 and what it means for the next phase of the UK’s legally binding net-zero goal.

 

UK emissions are now halfway to net-zero

In 1990, the year Margaret Thatcher resigned after more than a decade as prime minister, the UK’s greenhouse gas emissions stood at 794m tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (MtCO2e).

This is conventionally taken as the baseline for the UK’s climate goals, including the net-zero target under its legally binding Climate Change Act and its international pledge to the Paris Agreement.

(Net-zero is formulated in law as cutting greenhouse gas emissions to “at least 100 per cent” below 1990 levels by 2050. As it stands, the target currently does not directly include emissions from international aviation and shipping, though the government’s climate advisers want this to change.)

It has taken 30 years for UK emissions to fall 51 per cent below 1990 levels, according to Carbon Brief’s new analysis of government data. This is halfway to net-zero, with another 30 years to reach the target. (Progress would have been slightly slower if including international aviation and expected changes to the UK’s greenhouse gas inventory. The target will not include emissions associated with UK consumption of goods and services imported from overseas.)

A look back to 1990 helps to explain why emissions have fallen so far in those intervening years – and what remains to be tackled on the road to net-zero.

Despite Thatcher’s clash with mining unions in the 1980s, coal still made up two-thirds of electricity in 1990, making the power sector the largest contributor to the nation’s emissions at that time.

The “dash for gas” had yet to reshape the electricity market – and oil power still made up 10 per cent of generation. Renewables made up just 2 per cent of the mix, almost exclusively from hydro.

Industrial processes released powerful greenhouse gases, such as halocarbons and nitrous oxide, with limited controls. Methane leaked from gas fields, landfill sites and coal mines.

By 2019, the UK’s greenhouse gas emissions had been dramatically reduced, falling to 45 per cent below 1990 levels even as the economy grew by nearly 80 per cent.

Almost all of the fall in emissions between 1990 and 2019 had been due to major changes in just three areas, which together account for roughly 90 per cent of the decline:

  • Electricity supplies that no longer rely on coal (in round numbers, about 40 per cent);
  • Cleaner industry (40 per cent), including manufacturing and waste industry emissions controls on landfill methane, halocarbons and nitrous oxide (25 per cent), as well as more efficient industrial processes and a structural shift away from carbon-intensive manufacturing (15 per cent);
  • A smaller and cleaner fossil fuel supply industry, with lower methane emissions from coal mines and leaky gas distribution pipes (10 per cent).

Much slower progress had been made on the gas used to heat homes and offices, which by 2019 made up a fifth of the UK’s emissions, despite more efficient boilers and better insulation.

Meanwhile, almost no progress had been made in transport, which was by 2019 responsible for more than a quarter of the UK’s emissions and was the single largest contributor.

 

Emissions declined at the fastest rate on record in 2020

In 2020, the pattern of emissions reductions was very different to that seen in previous years, largely as a result of the unique impacts of the coronavirus pandemic.

Based on analysis of government energy use data, Carbon Brief estimates that UK greenhouse gas emissions fell by 11 per cent in 2020. (See methodology note, below, for more details.)

This would be the largest percentage reduction since at least 1990, as the chart below shows, eclipsing the fall in the wake of the global financial crisis.

 

 

Looking at CO2 only, the estimated 13 per cent drop in 2020 would be the fastest annual decline on record in figures stretching back to 1850, excluding years with widespread industrial action.

The drop in 2020 marks a record eighth consecutive year of reductions in the UK.

(Notably, one of the largest recent annual increases came in 2010, as the economy rebounded after the financial crisis. The big jump in 2012 was due to a surge in coal power output, partly caused by cheap imports from the US in the wake of its shale-gas revolution.)

 

Oil demand crashed in the wake of Covid-19

Looking at the causes of the record fall in UK emissions in 2020, the largest contribution was from lower oil use, making up around 60 per cent of the overall reduction.

Oil demand crashed by 18 per cent year-on-year in 2020, largely as a result of the coronavirus pandemic.

Reduced petrol and diesel sales account for around 88 per cent of the fall in UK oil demand last year overall, with a further 4 per cent from the drop in domestic aviation. This contrasts with the situation up until 2019, where transport emissions had barely changed for 30 years.

The reduction in oil demand is clearly reflected in lower fuel duty receipts for 2020, which were down by a fifth compared to 2019 and by nearly three-fifths during the height of the first lockdown.

In total, this means that Covid-related lockdowns cost the Treasury around £5bn in lost revenues from petrol and diesel sales alone, as shown in the chart below.

 

 

Within the total for road transport fuels, different segments have been affected more or less strongly, as shown in the chart below. Cars saw the largest reductions in miles driven during the first three quarters of 2020, whereas deliveries by vans and trucks were less strongly hit.

 

 

Notably, the latest figures show government fuel-duty receipts remaining more than a fifth below normal levels during January 2021, as the UK’s Covid lockdowns continued.

Nevertheless, the fall in oil use can still be expected to reverse as restrictions unwind, because there have not been structural shifts to push transport away from its heavy reliance on fossil fuels.

The expected move towards greater home working and consequent reduced commuting by car may be counterbalanced by a reluctance to use public transport, for example, potentially meaning heavier use of private vehicles. Efforts to encourage cycling and walking will likely take time to bear fruit.

Meanwhile, although plug-in electric vehicles are seeing rapid growth and now account for more than 10 per cent of new UK car sales, they still make up less than 1 per cent of the 32m cars on the roads. This means they are, for now, having a negligible impact on transport emissions.

 

 

Gas use fell on warmer weather and cleaner power

The second-largest factor in 2020 was lower gas use, down 8 per cent due to a combination of warmer weather and reduced gas power output. More than half of UK CO2 emissions are now from gas.

Most of the fall in gas use – around three-fifths of the total – was due to lower gas-fired electricity generation. This is explored in more detail in the next section and was only partly Covid-related.

The other two-fifths of the fall in gas use was mainly down to reduced heating demand, as a result of warmer weather and Covid restrictions, which saw shops and hospitality closed for long periods.

In 2020, the number of “heating-degree days” – a measure of building heat demand – was 14 per cent below the long-term average for 1981-2010, as the chart below shows. But the 2020 figure – including a particularly mild January – was also 6 per cent lower than in 2019.

The long-term shift towards fewer heating degree days in the UK is due to the escalating impact of global warming. A year as warm as 2020 would historically have been expected only once every 90 years, whereas climate change has increased the likelihood to once every other year.

Nevertheless, the gas used to heat the majority of buildings in the UK will remain a major issue on the road to net-zero, as it still accounts for a fifth of overall emissions.

 

Renewable power outstripped fossil fuels for first time

The electricity sector is where the large majority of UK emissions cuts have occurred over the past decade, during which the country’s power supplies have been transformed.

In 2020, emissions in the power sector fell again, as its structural shift away from coal and gas continued. Lower coal power output pushed demand for the fuel down again, from already very low levels, meaning this made a relatively small contribution to the overall change in UK emissions.

Coal met just 1.6 per cent of generation and the UK went without coal power on 180 of the 366 days last year (49 per cent). This compares with just 83 days in 2019 and 21 days in 2018.

Last year also saw a marked 15 per cent drop in gas generation thanks to lower demand and another increase from renewables. The longer-term trend towards lower electricity demand continued and was accelerated by the impact of Covid lockdowns, with a 4 per cent reduction in 2020.

Since 2010, UK electricity demand has fallen by 58 terawatt hours (TWh, 15 per cent), an amount equivalent to more than two Hinkley Point C new nuclear plants (26TWh).

At the same time, the UK has significantly expanded its capacity of windfarms, solar parks and bioenergy plants, meaning the 43 per cent share of electricity generated by renewables was larger than from fossil fuels for the first time in 2020, as shown in the chart below.

Wind power alone contributed 25 per cent of electricity generation in 2020 after an 18 per cent annual increase, thanks to the completion of two new offshore windfarms, Hornsea One and East Anglia One. These added an extra 2 gigawatts (GW) and brought the total for offshore wind capacity to more than 10GW. The year was also windier than 2019, with average wind speeds up 10 per cent.

Bioenergy generated 13 per cent of electricity, rising by 6 per cent year-on-year. Note that the burning of wood pellets at Drax makes up only around a third of overall biomass electricity supplies.

further third comes from smaller plants that burn plant biomass, most of which is also wood. These smaller plants – such as the Iggesund cardboard factory in Workington, Cumbria – typically rely on domestic sources and predominantly take low-value forestry streams or waste wood. The final third of biomass electricity comes from landfill gas, anaerobic digestion and sewage sludge.

Meanwhile, nuclear generation fell by 11 per cent due to prolonged outages at Dungeness, Hunterston and Hinkley Point B, but the sector still made up 16 per cent of the UK total. All but one of the UK’s remaining nuclear plants are due to retire by 2030.

 

Emissions likely to rebound in 2021 or 2022

The UK’s progress in cutting emissions has been built on structural shifts away from coal power and towards renewables, as well as a cleaner, less carbon-intensive industrial base.

Yet the reductions in 2020 were largely one-off and unique to the coronavirus pandemic, with lockdowns persisting through much of the year in the UK. As a result, the country’s economic output declined by an estimated 10 per cent, posting the biggest hit in the G20 group of nations.

The government’s Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) has forecast a bounceback in economic growth of 4 per cent this year and 7 per cent in 2022, naturally raising questions about the impact on emissions.

Since so much of the reduction in UK emissions last year was due to cars parked on driveways, an emissions rebound is also likely, though its timing and strength will depend on the pace of the recovery, the length of ongoing Covid restrictions and the impact of ongoing structural changes.

The chart below shows how UK greenhouse gas emissions have changed each year since 1990 (red dots) and the contributions to these changes from economic growth (grey bars) and from changes in the emissions associated with each unit of GDP (blue bars).

The chart also shows what would happen to emissions growth in 2021 and 2022, assuming GDP follows the OBR forecast and if the UK’s emissions intensity improves at the same rate as it has, on average, each year since 2000.

If these assumptions hold, then emissions might not increase this year – but 7 per cent GDP growth in 2022 would all but guarantee an emissions rebound. It is worth emphasising, however, that there are at least two reasons to doubt these assumptions will hold true.

First, the OBR’s GDP forecast has changed significantly since November and is likely to change again. Second, the chart shows that the UK’s emissions intensity failed to follow the historical trend during the recovery from the global financial crisis. Given the uniqueness of last year’s conditions, there is every reason to believe the trend could be broken again in the post-Covid recovery.

The likelihood of an emissions rebound as the economy recovers makes it all the more clear that the UK will need to focus on structural changes – rather than one-off events – if it is to meet its net-zero emissions target over the next 30 years.

 

UK CO2 emissions now lowest since 1879

As Carbon Brief has documented the decline in UK emissions over the past five years it has become traditional to compare the current total to the historical record.

In 2018, Carbon Brief analysis showed that UK CO2 emissions had fallen to levels last seen in 1890, during the late Victorian era, a point repeated in press reports and by ministers in parliament.

The record decline last year means the UK’s CO2 output in 2020 was the lowest since 1879, outside years affected by general strikes, as the chart below shows.

That year, Benjamin Disraeli was British prime minister, the country was at war with the Zulus and Thomas Edison had just applied to patent his lightbulb.

Intriguingly, the chart shows that the UK’s CO2 emissions in 2020 were lower than the amount released from coal burning alone in 1970. It also highlights how gas is the largest contributor to the total, with oil a close second and coal far behind after its near-elimination from the power sector.

Per capita UK emissions now close to world average

On a per-capita basis, given the UK population has more than doubled over the past century, CO2 emissions are now as low as they were in 1853.

At 4.5tCO2 per person, the average UK resident’s emissions are now roughly in line with the global average, as the chart below shows.

The UK’s per-capita emissions are now not only substantially lower than in the US, at 13.8tCO2 per person, but also the 7.5tCO2 for China. However, the UK’s per-capita figure remains around three times those for the average Indian.

At the global level, while the timing of net-zero is expected to vary between countries, overall human-caused greenhouse gas emissions must reach net-zero in order to stabilise the world’s temperature.

 

How Carbon Brief estimated UK emissions in 2020

Carbon Brief’s estimates of the UK’s greenhouse gas emissions in 2020 are based on analysis of provisional energy use figures published by BEIS on 25 February 2021. The same approach has accurately estimated year-to-year changes in emissions in previous years (see table, below).

One large source of uncertainty is the provisional energy use data, which BEIS revises at the end of March each year and often again later on. Emissions data is also subject to revision in light of improvements in data collection and the methodology used.

The table above applies Carbon Brief’s emissions calculations to the latest energy use and emissions figures, which may differ from those published previously.

Another source of uncertainty is the fact that Carbon Brief’s approach to estimating the annual change in emissions differs from the methodology used for the BEIS provisional estimates. This is largely because BEIS has access to more granular data, which is not available for public use.

In Carbon Brief’s approach, UK CO2 emissions are estimated by multiplying the reported consumption of each fossil fuel, in energy terms, by its emissions factor. This is the amount of CO2 released for each unit of energy consumed and it varies for different fuels.

For example, diesel, petrol and jet fuel have different emissions factors and Carbon Brief’s analysis accounts for this where possible. This adjustment is based on the quantity of each fuel type used per year, drawn from separate BEIS figures covering oilcoal and gas.

Emissions from land use and forestry are assumed to remain at the same level as in the previous year. Carbon Brief also uses the same approach as the BEIS methodology for estimating the change in emissions from greenhouse gases other than CO2.

Note that the figures in this article are for emissions within the UK measured according to international guidelines. This means they exclude emissions associated with imported goods, including imported biomass, as well as the UK’s share of international aviation and shipping.

The Office for National Statistics (ONS) has published detailed comparisons between various different approaches to calculating UK emissions, on a territorial, consumption, environmental accounts or international accounting basis.

The UK’s consumption-based CO2 emissions increased between 1990 and 2007. Since then, however, they have fallen by a similar number of tonnes as emissions within the UK.

Bioenergy is a significant source of renewable energy in the UK and its climate benefits are disputed. Contrary to public perception, however, only around one quarter of bioenergy is imported.

International aviation is considered part of the UK’s carbon budgets and faces the prospect of tighter limits on its CO2 emissions. The international shipping sector has a target to at least halve its emissions by 2050, relative to 2008 levels.

This story was published with permission from Carbon Brief.

 


 

Source Eco Business

Singapore renewable energy finance firm Positive Energy scales back as Covid stymies investment

Singapore renewable energy finance firm Positive Energy scales back as Covid stymies investment

The startup endured a tough 2020, shed staff and its co-founder relocated to the Netherlands as the firm’s only remaining employee. The startup’s struggles reflect the difficulties of renewables entrepreneurship in the Covid era.

Singapore-based renewable energy financing company Positive Energy has scaled back operations after enduring a difficult year impacted by the Covid-19 pandemic.

Positive Energy is a digital platform that connects renewable energy projects to investors, and aims to simplify and speed-up renewable energy project financing. Founded in 2017, the Asia-focused firm makes money by taking a cut of deals made on its platform.

Having raised seed funding and launched the platform in 2019, the firm ran into difficulties after failing to secure further financing in 2020. The platform was suspended late last year, and the company let go employees in Singapore, where it was headquartered, as well as business heads in Vietnam and India.

Co-founder and chief finance officer Vincent Bakker joined another firm at the start of this year. Co-founder and chief executive Nicolas Payen is now the sole employee, and has relocated from Singapore to the Netherlands.

Positive Energy recently landed a waste-to-energy deal that saved the company, and the platform is up and running again, Payen told Eco-Business.

Positive Energy is not the only player in the renewables space to face difficulties over the last year. The pandemic has applied the brakes to development capital, and investors have pulled back in emerging markets, meaning fewer potential deals to run on Positive Energy’s platform. The Covid-induced fall in electricity demand has also slowed the planning and execution of energy deals.

Payen said that although 2021 still presented uncertainties, if Covid vaccinations are rolled out quickly, a return to peak energy demand would follow, and that would mean a need for additional clean energy generation and investment.

“We have seen a number of countries declare net zero ambitions, and a lot of investment will be oriented towards climate friendly technology. So the fundamentals of our business are very strong,” he said.

“We will see growing momentum among climate technology venture capitalists this year. If we get the capital support we need, we can play our role in the energy transition.”

Payen said he remained focused on the company’s mission — rethinking the energy funding process to accelerate the deployment of renewable energy assets globally.

 


Sustainability is a growing business priority as a result of Covid-19, research shows

Sustainability is a growing business priority as a result of Covid-19, research shows

Sustainability is going to be more important to large companies as a result of Covid-19, according to new research.

Over 70% of companies interviewed for the research commissioned by the Carbon Trust said environmental management and/or sustainability priorities are likely to become ‘somewhat more important’ or ‘significantly more important’ for them as a result of Covid-19.

Even those companies that have been significantly impacted by the pandemic still believe sustainability is going to become more important. Of those experiencing significant disruption, 69% expect environmental management and/or sustainability to become ‘somewhat’ or ‘significantly more important’.

The Carbon Trust commissioned B2B International to undertake the ‘Corporate attitudes towards sustainability’ research for a second year. It conducted 453 interviews with large companies (minimum 1,000 employees and over a quarter with more than 5,000 employees) in the following countries: Germany, France, Mexico, Singapore, Spain, and the UK.

The research was undertaken in July of this year so does not reflect business confidence following more recent ‘second spikes’ in Europe especially, however our experience suggests that the findings are likely to still be accurate.

 

Business priority

Hugh Jones, Managing Directory, Advisory at the Carbon Trust commented: “The findings of this research are consistent with what we are seeing in the market.

Sustainability is rightly a growing business priority and the increasing demand for our services aimed at helping corporates to decarbonise and adapt for the future demonstrates that, despite extremely challenging market conditions, this is one area that businesses are continuing to prioritise.

“The global health crisis is perhaps elevating the need for action on risk in boardrooms globally, and the climate crisis presents risks that no business can afford to ignore.”

 

The global health crisis is perhaps elevating the need for action on risk in boardrooms globally, and the climate crisis presents risks that no business can afford to ignore.

 

Three quarters of organisations interviewed had been negatively impacted by Covid-19 – with 4% saying it represented an existential threat to their organisation from which they may not be able to recover, while 32% said they had been significantly impacted by the pandemic, with operations heavily impaired, or sales/revenue badly impacted.

The worst disruption was experienced in Spain but the impact was reasonably consistent across all geographies.

Large companies in Germany and Mexico are most likely to think their sustainability priorities will become more important as a result of the pandemic (82% and 79% of those interviewed in each country respectively) with sustainability covering the use of natural resources and the reduction of environmental impact across the organisation.

The sectors that are most optimistic about the growing importance of sustainability as a corporate priority are wholesale and retail, construction, engineering and mining, manufacturing, and healthcare. No matter what the sector, only around a third of companies expect there to be no change or that environmental management/sustainability will become less important.

 

Green recovery

Hugh Jones, Managing Directory, Advisory at the Carbon Trust added: “Organisations around the world are considering their role in delivering a green recovery – achieving net zero targets at the same time as fostering economic activity.

“We know from working with corporate clients on their net zero targets and strategies, that many will be leading the way when it comes to achieving green growth and these research findings support this. Without corporate commitment a green recovery will be challenging to deliver so the research is great news.”

Budgets for sustainability are also expected to increase as a result of Covid-19 – 63% of those interviewed said their budgets will get ‘significantly’ or ‘somewhat bigger’ and only 16% said they would be ‘somewhat smaller’.

 

Organisations around the world are considering their role in delivering a green recovery…

 

The majority of companies (74%) believe that sustainability will become more important to their customers as a result of Covid-19 – with almost a third saying it will become ‘significantly more important for their customers’ – and this is especially the case in Mexico (82%), Germany (81%) and Spain (79%).

This is the second year that the Carbon Trust has commissioned research on attitudes towards sustainability, although this year has seen the addition of companies from Singapore, Mexico and the UK to the research.

Compared to 2019, all trackable markets have seen environmental management/sustainability become more of a priority for organisations, especially in Germany.

More organisations also have dedicated sustainability professionals than in 2019 (39% in 2020 compared to 35% in 2019), although now half of companies say that this role is combined with other duties (up from 46% in 2019).

 


 

By Darrel Moore

Source: Circular Online

Virus-idled Indian workers dig into a new job: Boosting water security

Virus-idled Indian workers dig into a new job: Boosting water security

Basant Ahirwar worked as an expert mason in India’s northern Uttar Pradesh state before the country’s coronavirus lockdown shut down business and forced him to return, jobless and largely on foot, to his home in central India’s Madhya Pradesh state.

Now, however, he has found new work: Digging water capture pits into the hillsides of his drought-hit home district, a project aimed at restoring depleting aquifers and providing an income to thousands of unemployed workers.

About 7,000 returning migrant workers and other unemployed people have been hired to do the work, with 50,000 pits dug since April on more than 40 hills around Sagar district, authorities said.

“This work has become a means of sustenance for us,” said Ahirwar, who said he was being paid about 190 rupees ($2.50) a day for the work – a third of what he used to get as a mason but welcome in a time when few other jobs are available.

He said rainwater was already collecting in the trenches and “the hills, which were earlier barren, have now become lush and green”, raising the prospect that farming in the district, slammed by drought, could become more successful again.

The work, which had been carried out earlier on a smaller scale, is being done under the Mahatma Gandhi Rural Employment Guarantee Act, which aims to offer at least 100 days of paid employment a year per family in need of work.

Ichchhit Garhpale, the head of Sagar district’s panchayat, or local council, said the effort aims to improve groundwater levels in the district.

As rainwater flows down the hills, it is trapped in the trenches, he said, and percolates slowly into the soil, rather than rushing away and causing erosion.

He said the pit system could help capture as much as 60 million litres of additional water in the course of a year.

Similar pits are planned on 20 to 25 more hills owned by the state government in the district, he said, as the project pushes ahead.

The work has come as a relief to thousands of migrant workers who rushed home in March after Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi declared a nationwide lockdown as cases of the coronavirus began rising.

The shutdown left millions without prospects for work – but efforts like that in Sagar have helped shore up families and raised the prospect that some may remain in their home districts.

 

‘Nothing better’

Rohit Vishwakarma, who used to work in Nagpur, almost 400 kilometres (250 miles) from Sagar, said he saw the project providing better long-term prospects at home.

“The area faces acute drinking water shortages. One has to cover long distances to fetch water during the summer season. The wells and hand-pumps run dry due to the fast-depleting groundwater,” he said.

“If we are able to solve the water problem, there is nothing better than that,” he said. And “if we continue to get this kind of work, we will not have to return to big cities to work.”

Sagar district sits in India’s Bundelkhand region, which is famous for its problems with drought. Erratic rain often leads to crop losses and joblessness, and the region struggles with other problems, from widespread illiteracy to inadequate healthcare.

Over the last decade, even normally erratic rains have been in decline, with the region seeing just half what is considered “normal” rainfall for the last six years, according to data from the India Meteorological Department.

But local officials said the trench digging – with trees in some cases planted on the soil removed, and grass beginning to sprout as well – may help turn around a bad situation.

“Grass and plants grow on it naturally, and thus food becomes available for villagers’ cattle and grazing animals,” said Garhpale, head of the local council.

He said that water levels in wells in the area also had shown signs of rising as a result of the work, and that problems with flooding downstream when heavy rain falls had been reduced.

This story was published with permission from Thomson Reuters Foundation, the charitable arm of Thomson Reuters, that covers humanitarian news, climate change, resilience, women’s rights, trafficking and property rights. Visit http://news.trust.org/climate.

 


 

Survey: Consumer sentiment on sustainability in fashion

Survey: Consumer sentiment on sustainability in fashion

While the fashion industry is reorganizing for the next normal after the COVID-19 crisis, European consumers have become even more engaged in sustainability topics. That presents an opportunity for the fashion industry to reiterate its commitment to sustainability. Moreover, now could be the moment to drive less seasonality in the fashion system.

Our survey was conducted in April 2020 across more than 2,000 UK and German consumers.1 It is part of a firmwide effort to capture consumer sentiment during the COVID-19 crisis.

 

Sentiment toward sustainability

Amid the shock and uncertainty that the fashion sector is facing during the COVID-19 crisis, there is a silver lining for the environment: two-thirds of surveyed consumers state that it has become even more important to limit impacts on climate change. Additionally, 88 percent of respondents believe that more attention should be paid to reducing pollution.

In practice, consumers have already begun changing their behaviors accordingly. Of consumers surveyed, 57 percent have made significant changes to their lifestyles to lessen their environmental impact, and more than 60 percent report going out of their way to recycle and purchase products in environmentally friendly packaging (Exhibit 1).

 

 

Emphasis on social and environmental commitments

While the industry is reorganizing for the next normal, it should consider that consumers want fashion players to uphold their social and environmental responsibilities amid the crisis. Of surveyed consumers, 67 percent consider the use of sustainable materials to be an important purchasing factor, and 63 percent consider a brand’s promotion of sustainability in the same way.

Additionally, surveyed consumers expect brands to take care of their employees, as well as workers in Asia, during the COVID-19 crisis (Exhibit 2). That highlights the need for brands to maintain ethical commitments, despite the crisis.

 

 

Overall, it is imperative to build trust and transparency with consumers, as 70 percent are sticking with brands they know and trust during the crisis. Of surveyed consumers, 75 percent consider a trusted brand to be an important purchasing factor. However, younger consumers, particularly Gen Zers and millennials, are more likely to experiment with smaller or lesser-known brands during the crisis (Exhibit 3).

 

 

Shift in purchasing behavior

With 88 percent of consumers expecting a slow recovery or a recession, general consumer confidence is low. As a result, consumer spending on fashion is also changing. More than 60 percent of consumers report spending less on fashion during the crisis, and approximately half expect that trend to continue after the crisis passes. However, consumers are likely to cut back on accessories, jewelry, and other discretionary categories before reducing their spending on apparel and footwear (Exhibit 4).

 

 

When it comes to making changes to purchasing behavior, younger consumer segments are willing to buy cheaper versions of products they normally buy—approximately 50 percent of Gen Zers and millennials in our survey report trading down (Exhibit 5).

 

 

The COVID-19 crisis has recruited new consumers to online channels: 43 percent of surveyed consumers who didn’t purchase fashion online before the crisis have started using online channels. And that shift is unlikely to reverse, as nearly 28 percent of consumers expect to buy less at physical stores—a trend seen in higher shares in Generation Z and millennial respondents (Exhibit 6).

 

 

Mindset on fashion cycles and circular business models

The survey findings indicate that the consumer mindset is not strongly tied to the fashion cycle, so now could be the moment to drive less seasonality in the fashion system. Of surveyed consumers, 65 percent are supportive of fashion brands delaying the launch of new collections as a result of the COVID-19 crisis. Additionally, 58 percent of respondents are less concerned about the fashion of clothing than other factors following the crisis, and consumers now cite newness as one of the least important attributes when making purchases (Exhibit 7).

 

 

As a result of the COVID-19 crisis, 65 percent of respondents are planning to purchase more durable fashion items, and 71 percent are planning to keep the items they already have for longer (Exhibit 8). Additionally, 57 percent of respondents are willing to repair items to prolong usage.

 

 

Particularly among younger European consumers, there is interest in purchasing secondhand fashion items following the COVID-19 crisis. Of surveyed consumers, around 50 percent of Gen Zers and millennials expect to purchase more items secondhand (Exhibit 9).

 

 

Overall, consumer sentiment suggests that the COVID-19 crisis could serve as a reset opportunity for players in the apparel, footwear, and luxury sectors to strengthen their sustainability commitments and accelerate industry-wide changes, such as reduced seasonality and scaling of circular business models.

 


 

About the author(s)

Anna Granskog is a partner in McKinsey’s Helsinki office, Libbi Lee and Corinne Sawers are associate partners in the London office, and Karl-Hendrik Magnus is a senior partner in the Frankfurt office.

The authors wish to thank Poorni Polgampola, Nadya Snezhkova, and Jan Vlcek for their contributions to this article.

Source: https://www.mckinsey.com/

Proposed Indonesian coal power plant not financially viable, study finds

Proposed Indonesian coal power plant not financially viable, study finds

Green groups have long criticised the Jawa 9 & 10 coal power project over its devastating impacts on public health and the environment. Now, a study has revealed the project would also be unprofitable for its investors.

The 2,000-megawatt Jawa 9 & 10 coal-fired power project planned to be built near the Indonesian capital city Jakarta would result in significant losses for investors if it goes through, a new pre-feasibility study released on Thursday (18 June) has revealed.

The analysis conducted by Korea Development Institute (KDI), an autonomous policy-oriented research organisation, shows the present value of cash flows pumped into the power project would exceed that of inbound cash flows by US$43.58 million over the station’s lifetime.

Almost three-quarters of the project volume is financed through loans provided by lenders such as Singapore bank DBS, Siemens Bank, Korean public banks, as well as Malaysian and Indonesian banks, which include Maybank, CIMB, Bank Negara Indonesia, Exim Bank of Indonesia and Bank Mandiri, among others.

However, South Korean utility Korea Electric Power Corporation (Kepco) is the only foreign firm backing the project that will hold a share of ownership in the plant. It is poised to lose US$7.08 million in equity investments, according to the study, which was obtained by Seoul-based non-profit Solutions for our Climate.

Other equity investors associated with the venture include Jakarta-based power and petrochemical firm Barito Pacific and Indonesia Power, a subsidiary of Indonesia’s state utility Perusahaan Listrik Negara (PLN), which provides the land for the station.

Solutions for our Climate director Youn Sejong said while loan investors were less at risk because their investment would be paid off first, the fact that the project itself was valued negative should still be a wakeup call for the banks supporting it.

“Investors backing the project should pull out given the estimated unprofitability. Because the construction has not commenced, this is the best time to withdraw from the project with no sunk cost involved,” he told Eco-Business.

The project, which is to add two power plant units to the Suralaya coal-fired power station in Cilegon, a city in Indonesia’s Banten province, is expected to be in operation from 2024. The new plant units will use ultra-supercritical technology to enable higher efficiencies and lower emissions.

Besides the Jawa project, Kepco is planning to acquire a share in the planned Vung Ang 2 project in Ha Tinh province, Vietnam. Its stake in the venture would see the company build two 600-megawatt coal plants carrying a price tag of US$2.24 billion.

This is despite a recent estimate by the KDI that the net value of the Vung Ang 2 project stands at negative $158 million, with Kepco’s planned investment valued at negative $80 million.

Around the globe, pressure is mounting on governments and companies to drop coal, the world’s single-biggest contributor to man-made global warming, amid increasingly dire warnings of climate change.

Both the Jawa and the Vung Ang ventures have received heavy criticism from environmental activists and health experts in recent years, who have urged the corporations backing them to recognise the reputational, legal and environmental risks involved in the investments.

A 2019 report by environmental campaigners Greenpeace that modelled the health impacts of the Jawa project concluded the station would cause 4,700 premature deaths over its lifetime.

The new assessment comes as the Korean government puts together its Green New Deal package, a collection of sweeping policies geared towards ending South Korea’s contribution to climate change. The move was announced as part of the Liberal Party of Korea’s election manifesto earlier this year.

Following Moon Jae-in’s recent landslide victory, the government is expected to implement a carbon tax, foster investment in clean energy, and phase out domestic as well as overseas coal power financing.

Last month, the world’s top asset manager BlackRock, which owns shares in Kepco, raised concerns over several coal projects the utility firm is involved in.

According to the KDI, Kepco’s financial plan for the Jawa project takes an overly optimistic view of the expected amount of power sales and potential power transmission rates.

The firm has also likely underestimated engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) costs and not taken into account the financial difficulties currently facing Korean company Doosan Heavy Industries & Construction, the venture’s EPC contractor, amid the coronavirus crisis.

This increases the risk of budget overruns and project delays, although they would only indirectly affect Kepco as the EPC contractor would be required to bear the added costs.

The KDI pointed out the global transition to renewables indicated coal’s decline and could entail negative consequences for the Jawa power plant units.

At the same time, the ongoing coronavirus pandemic, which has yet to peak in Indonesia, may affect the project as it wreaks havoc on supply chains and project timelines while reducing electricity consumption. Youn said: “Planning of the Jawa 9 & 10 project was based on a gross overestimation of power demand growth.”

“Kepco should consider participating in the project only after closely examining the particular economic and market conditions in Indonesia,” reads the KDI’s report.

Despite the bleak profitability outlook, however, Kepco pursues its investment plans and seeks to obtain its board’s approval on the investment in the next board meeting scheduled for the end of June, according to Solutions for our Climate.

Earlier this month, the company announced through the media that the project passed the new pre-feasibility study, although the project score indicated that investments should be “considered with caution”, said the non-profit in a statement released on Thursday (18 June). In total, the firm looks to commit US$51 million to the Jawa venture.

In its statement, Solutions for our Climate said: “Kepco’s hasty decision to invest in the Jawa 9 & 10 project is likely to undermine the Korean government’s initiative towards a clean energy transition and sustainable economy.”

 


 

Source : https://www.eco-business.com/

By Tim Ha

‘More masks than jellyfish’: coronavirus waste ends up in ocean

‘More masks than jellyfish’: coronavirus waste ends up in ocean

Conservationists have warned that the coronavirus pandemic could spark a surge in ocean pollution – adding to a glut of plastic waste that already threatens marine life – after finding disposable masks floating like jellyfish and waterlogged latex gloves scattered across seabeds.

The French non-profit Opération Mer Propre, whose activities include regularly picking up litter along the Côte d’Azur, began sounding the alarm late last month.

Divers had found what Joffrey Peltier of the organisation described as “Covid waste” – dozens of gloves, masks and bottles of hand sanitiser beneath the waves of the Mediterranean, mixed in with the usual litter of disposable cups and aluminium cans.

The quantities of masks and gloves found were far from enormous, said Peltier. But he worried that the discovery hinted at a new kind of pollution, one set to become ubiquitous after millions around the world turned to single-use plastics to combat the coronavirus. “It’s the promise of pollution to come if nothing is done,” said Peltier.

In France alone, authorities have ordered two billion disposable masks, said Laurent Lombard of Opération Mer Propre. “Knowing that … soon we’ll run the risk of having more masks than jellyfish in the Mediterranean,” he wrote on social media alongside video of a dive showing algae-entangled masks and soiled gloves in the sea near Antibes.

The group hopes the images will prompt people to embrace reusable masks and swap latex gloves for more frequent handwashing. “With all the alternatives, plastic isn’t the solution to protect us from Covid. That’s the message,” said Peltier.

In the years leading up to the pandemic, environmentalists had warned of the threat posed to oceans and marine life by skyrocketing plastic pollution. As much as 13 million tonnes of plastic goes into oceans each year, according to a 2018 estimate by UN Environment. The Mediterranean sees 570,000 tonnes of plastic flow into it annually – an amount the WWF has described as equal to dumping 33,800 plastic bottles every minute into the sea.

These figures risk growing substantially as countries around the world confront the coronavirus pandemic. Masks often contain plastics such as polypropylene, said Éric Pauget, a French politician whose region includes the Côte d’Azur.

 

Gloves, masks and bottles of hand sanitiser have been collected around France’s Côte d’Azur. Photograph: Courtesy Operation Terre-Mer

 

“With a lifespan of 450 years, these masks are an ecological timebomb given their lasting environmental consequences for our planet,” he wrote last month in a letter to Emmanuel Macron, calling on the French president to do more to address the environmental consequences of disposable masks.

Earlier this year the Hong Kong-based OceansAsia began voicing similar concerns, after a survey of marine debris in the city’s uninhabited Soko Islands turned up dozens of disposable masks.

“On a beach about 100 metres long, we found about 70,” said Gary Stokes of OceansAsia. One week later, another 30 masks had washed up. “And that’s on an uninhabited island in the middle of nowhere.”

Curious to see how far the masks had travelled, he began checking other nearby beaches. “We’re finding them everywhere,” he said. “Ever since society started wearing masks, the cause and effects are being seen on the beaches.”

While some of the debris could be attributed to carelessness, he speculated that the lightweight masks were at times also being carried from land, boats and landfills by the wind.

“It’s just another item of marine debris,” he said, likening the masks to plastic bags or straws that often wash up on the city’s more remote shorelines. “It’s no better, no worse, just another item we’re leaving as a legacy to the next generation.”

Still, given the likelihood that porpoises and dolphins in the region could mistake a mask for food, he was bracing himself for a grim find. “We’re constantly getting them washing up dead and we’re just waiting for a necropsy when we find a mask inside,” he said. “I think it’s inevitable.”

 


 

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/

By