Search for any green Service

Find green products from around the world in one place

The March Budget 2021 and the Thunberg/Attenborough Effect: the myth of building back better rather than decarbonising

The March Budget 2021 and the Thunberg/Attenborough Effect: the myth of building back better rather than decarbonising

 

The primary challenge facing humanity is climate change. UK government policy must acknowledge that the primary challenge is not about ‘building back’ focusing on developing a revised economy that will be ‘better’ in some general way, but on decarbonising lifestyles. This process of decarbonising lifestyles will destroy jobs and firms but will create new opportunities. Our lifestyles must change including major alterations in the ways in which we consume.

 

John R. Bryson, Professor of Enterprise and Economic Geography, University of Birmingham,

There is no question that climate change is the most important challenge facing this planet. On 3 March 2021, Rishi Sunak, the UK Chancellor of the Exchequer, will present the 2021 budget. This will be an extraordinary budget for extraordinary times. The pre-budget media discussions commenced late last year, but there have been silent voices including those of Greta Thunberg and Sir David Attenborough. Next week, when you reflect on the budget, I would encourage you to consider how Thunberg and Attenborough would have used this political moment to shape a new national trajectory towards a decarbonised future.

All nation-states continue to grapple with the COVID-19 pandemic. The focus continues to be on reducing cases and transmission, vaccination and protecting the most vulnerable, health services and social care, education, childcare and protecting the economy. Over the medium term, a primary policy objective is to keep COVID-19 case numbers as low as possible once the current outbreak has been suppressed.

The March budget needs to set the tone for this government’s approach to balancing policy interventions intended to temper the impacts of COVID-19 on liveability and livelihoods with fiscal sustainability combined with addressing major global societal challenges including decarbonization. The UK economy will not return to as it was prior to the pandemic. There have been permanent changes in the labour market that reflect alterations in the ways in which goods and services are produced, traded, and consumed. These alterations will impact on everyone and transform national finances.

COVID-19 has destroyed jobs, firms, and lives, but the destructive impact of this pandemic will be nothing compared to climate change. Climate change will destroy cities, countries, businesses, and there will be increases in mortality and morbidity rates. One of the COVID-19 recovery mantras is based around the expression ‘build back better’. This approach was developed in 2015 by the United Nations as a crisis response strategy focussing on “integrating disaster risk reduction measures into the restoration of physical infrastructure and societal systems” (United Nations, 2017: 6). The emphasis was on recovery, rehabilitation, and reconstruction.

This three ‘B’ approach is dangerous as it is too general. Everyone will define ‘better’ in their own terms. Thus, the UK Build Back Better Campaign defines ‘better’ in terms of protecting public services, tackling inequalities in communities, provide well-paid jobs and creating a shockproof economy which can fight the climate crisis. This is all very well, but the primary challenge facing humanity is climate change. UK government policy must acknowledge that the primary challenge is not about ‘building back’ focusing on developing a revised economy that will be ‘better’ in some general way, but on decarbonising lifestyles. This process of decarbonising lifestyles will destroy jobs and firms but will create new opportunities. Our lifestyles must change including major alterations in the ways in which we consume.

New approaches must be developed based on taxation innovation driving alterations in lifestyles and business behaviour. For example, there are taxation solutions to the demise of high street retailing. These include replacing a property tax (business rates) with a sales tax and developing a taxation approach to forcing owners of retail properties to adopt turnover-based rents.

The key question is to consider the implications for Rishi Sunak as his team prepares for the 3 March 2021 Budget. There are three points to consider.

First, the UK government needs to raise revenue, and this will be a continuing challenge for this government and the next. Any increase must be staggered; a crisis is not the time to raise taxes. Over the short-term this will include increases in the corporation tax rate from its current 19%. Over the medium-term it will include increases in VAT and in personal taxation, but ideally these increases must be targeted at carbon-intensive activities, including lifestyles.

Second, the chancellor must continue to support companies and households as they experience the direct impacts of COVID-19. There will be an extension to current government COVID-19 support measures including the furlough scheme, the VAT cut for the hospitality and tourism sectors, the business rates holiday, and the temporary uplift to Universal Credit. The impact of the pandemic on government finances suggests that spending on these support measures will need to taper as the economy begins to recover.

Third, there is a danger that the COVID-19 support measures may be encouraging firms to continue to maintain current business models, products, and services. There needs to be a rapid shift towards products and services that support decarbonised lifestyles and that respond to some of the permanent alterations in labour markets and lifestyles that have emerged with COVID-19. Government policy, including taxation, must be developed that forces companies to innovate to support decarbonisation and to discourage carbon-intensive lifestyles.

The March 2021 budget must focus on the current crisis, but now is the time not to build back better, but to develop an effective cross-party approach to decarbonising our futures. This will require disruptive innovation and radical changes to everyday living.

One can only hope that the March budget places climate change at the centre of the political agenda. The danger is that talk about addressing climate change displaces action. Developing a climate change informed approach to taxation is an excellent starting point. The key question is: how far the March 2021 budget goes towards achieving this?

 


 

Source Eco News AU

Cheaper Solar Power Means Lower-Income Families Could Benefit

Cheaper Solar Power Means Lower-Income Families Could Benefit

Until recently, rooftop solar panels were a clean energy technology that only wealthy Americans could afford. But prices have dropped, thanks mostly to falling costs for hardware, as well as price declines for installation and other “soft” costs.

Today hundreds of thousands of middle-class households across the U.S. are turning to solar power. But households with incomes below the median for their areas remain less likely to go solar. These low- and moderate-income households face several roadblocks to solar adoption, including cash constraints, low rates of home ownership and language barriers.

Our team of researchers at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory examined how various policies and business models could affect the likelihood of people at all income levels adopting solar. In a recently published study, we analyzed five common solar policies and business models to see whether they attracted lower-income households.

We found that three scenarios did: offering financial incentives to low- and moderate-income households; leasing solar panels to homeowners; and lending money to buy panels, with the loan repaid on property tax bills. All of these approaches resulted in people at a wider range of income levels trying solar energy.

 

Solar Power for Everyone

For over a decade our team at the Berkeley lab’s Electricity Markets and Policy group has kept tabs on trends in the rooftop solar market through our annual report, “Tracking the Sun.” It documents how prices have fallen, and the number of installations has risen in U.S. solar markets.

Over the past decade rooftop solar power has grown significantly in the U.S., spreading beyond initial hot spots in California and Hawaii to states such as North Carolina, Florida and New Jersey. The industry projects that rapid growth will continue for the foreseeable future.

Chart: The Conversation, CC BY-ND. Source: Barbose et al., 2020. Get the data

 

More recently our researchers have combined this tracking report with data on household-level demographics and income of solar adopters, covering more than 70% of the U.S. residential solar market. Among the research products we’ve created is an online interactive tool that shows the demographic characteristics of solar adoption down to the county level.

Thanks to these price and growth trends, an increasing number of state and local governments, utilities and businesses want to help lower-income customers go solar. They believe solar will cut energy bills, reduce money spent on bill payment programs, avoid pollution and create green jobs.

So far, 20 states are offering 38 programs to help lower-income customers go solar. California, the largest, has budgeted over US$1 billion for such programs. A number of utilities and solar developers, like Posigen and GRID Alternatives, are also developing business models that work for all customers. These initiatives leverage state and federal incentives to deliver free or very low-cost solar to eligible households.

 

 

Reducing Upfront Costs

In our study we evaluated five policies and business models to see which ones helped low- and moderate-income households go solar:

  • Financial incentives targeted at low- and moderate-income households, usually rebates or other incentives to reduce upfront costs.
  • Leasing rooftop solar systems, which reduces upfront costs.
  • Property Assessed Clean Energy financing, or PACE, which allows customers to finance energy improvements through their property tax payments. Currently, residential PACE is available only in California, Florida and Missouri.
  • Financial incentives such as rebates offered to customers of any income level.
  • “Solarize” campaigns, in which customers band together in a group purchase to get a good price.

The study includes data on more than 1 million residential rooftop photovoltaic systems installed on single-family homes in 18 states from 2010 to 2018. We compared modeled household-level income estimates for solar adopters with area median household incomes from U.S. Census data.

We found that three of the interventions – targeted incentives, leasing and PACE – effectively increased adoption equity. These approaches are boosting sales to low-income customers in existing markets and helping solar companies move into new markets, such as low-income areas where solar sales have been weak or absent.

Policies that don’t address the needs and constraints of low-income households, like the federal income tax credit, have not had much effect on equity. And solarize campaigns are rarely pitched to low-income buyers.

 

An Untapped Customer Base

When solar expands into new markets and neighborhoods, it can have a spillover impact. If a system is installed in a neighborhood that had no solar before, neighbors who see it will be more likely to adopt it themselves. Moving into new markets may have greater potential effects on low-income adoption rates than reaching lower-income households in existing markets.

Expanding sales to low- and moderate-income households can also tap a larger base of potential customers. The U.S. National Renewable Energy Lab (NREL) found in a study that 42% of rooftops where solar power could work are on low- and moderate-income housing.

 

A 2018 study estimates that installing rooftop solar systems on low- and moderate-income housing could provide up to 42% of all rooftop technical potential in the residential sector and improve energy affordability in low-income communities. NREL

 

 

As the solar market grows, decisions to install solar systems are increasingly driven by the prospect of saving money, rather than strictly by green values or buyers’ interest in new technologies. A survey led by NREL found that roughly half of people who decided to install solar in California, New Jersey, New York and Arizona in 2014 to 2016 identified cost savings as a primary factor in their decision to adopt solar.

For low- and moderate-income households, the financial benefits of solar power can make a big difference. Many lower-income households carry a large energy burden, meaning that energy and utility costs consume a large share of their income. Across the U.S., low-income households spend about three times more of their income on energy costs than other households. Solar power can reduce those energy burdens by providing on-site power at a lower cost than grid electricity.

Making homes more energy efficient is an established strategy for cutting energy bills, but there’s growing interest in having solar play a role. Deploying solar power for low- and moderate-income households can be a way to fulfill policy and social goals like creating jobs and improving the environment.

The study described in this article was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy’s Solar Energy Technologies Office.

Galen Barbose is a research scientist at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Eric O’Shaughnessy is a research consultant at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Ryan Wiser is a senior scientist at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Disclosure statements: Eric O’Shaughnessy is a renewable energy research analyst at Clean Kilowatts, LLC. Ryan Wiser is a board member of the Clean Energy States Alliance. Galen Barbose does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

Reposted with permission from The Conversation.

 


 

Source Eco Watch

Joe Biden’s climate agenda aims to trigger a realistic paying jobs boom

Joe Biden’s climate agenda aims to trigger a realistic paying jobs boom

In the small Canadian city of Saint-Jérôme, Québec, electric bus and truck manufacturer Lion Electric is preparing to expand south of the border, aiming to open a plant in the United States by 2023, with the capacity to produce 20,000 vehicles a year.

After signing deals with online retailer Amazon and school districts across North America, the company expects the new factory will hire 1,500 people, from electrical engineers to assembly-line workers, and create another 9,500 jobs in its US supply chain.

“There’s a lot of people involved in building a 100-per cent electric vehicle,” said vice-president Patrick Gervais.

The expansion by Lion Electric – which is set to go public on the New York Stock Exchange in March, through a merger with a US acquisitions firm – seems well-timed.

US President Joe Biden, who took over from climate-change sceptic Donald Trump on Jan. 20, plans to invest US$2 trillion in green infrastructure over the next four years.

Besides combating climate change, the administration says the plan could create more than 10 million jobs.

“When I think of climate change and the answers to it, I think of jobs,” Biden said in a speech Wednesday, on a day he signed a second round of executive actions to help curb climate warming and protect people and the economy from its impacts.

“We can put millions of Americans to work modernising our water systems, transportation (and) our energy infrastructure to withstand the impacts of extreme climate,” Biden said.

A government-backed study out this week said reaching net-zero carbon emissions from US energy and industry by 2050 – as Biden aims to do—could be achieved by rebuilding energy infrastructure to run primarily on renewables, at a net cost of about $1 per person per day.

The transition would involve increasing energy efficiency, switching to electric technologies, using predominantly clean electricity—especially wind and solar power – and deploying a small amount of carbon capture technology, the researchers found.

Study co-author Margaret Torn, a senior scientist with the Department of Energy’s Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, said building clean infrastructure equates to jobs, including in the United States, “as opposed to sending money overseas to buy oil from other countries”.

“There’s no question that there will need to be a well-thought-out economic transition strategy for fossil fuel-based industries and communities,” she said in a statement.

“But there’s also no question that there are a lot of jobs in building a low-carbon economy.”

 

A wind farm shares space with corn fields the day before the Iowa caucuses, where agriculture and clean energy are key issues, in Latimer, Iowa, US. Image: Jonathan Ernst, via Reuters.

 

Fossil-fuel unemployment

Opponents of Biden’s plans to jumpstart climate action have raised concerns about the loss of jobs in traditional fossil fuel industries—oil, gas and coal.

Republican lawmakers have pointed to the executive order Biden signed within a few hours of taking office, cancelling construction of the Keystone XL pipeline.

Work on the pipeline—intended to carry more oil extracted from tar sands in Canada to the United States—would have sustained 11,000 US jobs in 2021, they maintain.

However, researchers and environmental advocates argue that clean energy offers far higher levels of employment compared to fossil fuels.

A 2019 study by University College London found that the broadly defined “green economy” in the United States—including renewable energy, environmental protection and low-carbon goods and services—provided nearly 9.5 million jobs.

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, US jobs in the coal mining industry, comparatively, halved between 2012 and 2020, employing some 44,600 people in October last year.

Under Biden’s green transition, the greatest job-growth potential could be in retrofitting buildings to make them more energy-efficient, said Adam Zurofsky, executive director of advocacy group Rewiring America, which is pushing for US homes to switch rapidly to electric heating and cooking.

This is due to the huge number of buildings across the country that need updating and the array of skills involved, from carpentry to electric installation, he said.

Such jobs are intrinsically American jobs, he added.

“You can’t retrofit a building or install solar panels (remotely) from China or India,” he told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

Zurofsky previously oversaw energy policy for New York state, and worked on shutting down the last remaining coal-fired power plants there.

Often communities would not object on environmental grounds, he said, “but that plant paid a lot of property taxes for the local school district… (and it) employed people in the town.”

The transition away from fossil fuels needs to be carefully planned and managed, including allowing a period of time to help people adjust, he emphasised.

 

A worker descends from the top deck of a car carrier trailer carrying Tesla electric vehicles at Tesla’s primary vehicle factory after CEO Elon Musk announced he was defying local officials’ coronavirus disease (Covid-19) restrictions by reopening the plant in Fremont, California, US. Image: Stephen Lam, via Reuters.

 

Decent work?

Another concern is the quality of jobs that might be created by Biden’s green infrastructure plan.

“It’s also about dealing with inequality and making sure the jobs created in the green economy are well-paid and have labour standards attached to them,” said Mike Fishman, executive director of the nonprofit Climate Jobs National Resource Center.

“Most of the jobs in solar installation (and) retrofitting tend to be both non-union and low-paid,” he added.

This week, Biden promised that his plan to recover from the Covid-19 pandemic through green economic stimulus would create “good-paying union jobs” at the “prevailing wage and benefits”.

But it could face significant resistance from Republicans in the Senate, particularly when it comes to inclusion of labour standards like fair wages and making it easier for workers to unionise, said Fishman.

“That will be a fight,” he added.

If successful, Biden aims to use the federal government’s procurement spending to ensure that companies given contracts have to abide by those labour conditions, which would also guarantee rights like paid leave and overtime.

The government spending, if approved, could include deploying more than half a million new electric-vehicle charging outlets across the country by 2030 and—critically, for firms like Lion Electric—converting all 500,000 US school buses to zero emissions.

“The green economy is the future—it’s the new economy,” said Gervais. “You do it for the environment but it’s also a viable business model.”

“We’re creating jobs that did not exist before,” he said. “It’s really exciting.”

 

This story was published with permission from Thomson Reuters Foundation, the charitable arm of Thomson Reuters, that covers humanitarian news, climate change, resilience, women’s rights, trafficking and property rights. Visit http://news.trust.org/climate.

 


 

Source Eco-Business

$20 million ‘Reef Builder’ program set to recover near extinct marine ecosystem

$20 million ‘Reef Builder’ program set to recover near extinct marine ecosystem

Reef Builder, an exciting partnership between the Australian Government and The Nature Conservancy, is set to create up to 170 jobs and engage up to 120 local contractors by bringing a marine ecosystem back from the brink of extinction.

Targeting bushfire and COVID-19 affected coastal communities, the $20 million investment will expand The Nature Conservancy’s successful program to rebuild shellfish reefs around the Australian coastline.

Rebuilding the reefs will create local jobs, boost important fish stocks, improve water quality, protect coastlines from erosion, and establish new fishing and dive tourism hotspots.

Reefs spread over the seafloor, covering the area of a football stadium, will be constructed in at least 11 coastal communities – from south-east Queensland right around Australia’s southern coastline to Perth in Western Australia.

“Shellfish reefs once thrived in Australia’s bays and estuaries, but from the 1850s to the 1960s they were decimated by overharvesting, dredging and water pollution,” said Dr Chris Gillies, Oceans Program Director at The Nature Conservancy.

“Now less than 10 per cent of these shellfish reefs remain, making them one of Australia’s most endangered marine ecosystems.”

In the past six years, The Nature Conservancy has worked with community groups, philanthropic organisations, businesses, universities and government agencies to develop a program to rebuild shellfish reefs. Early projects across southern and eastern Australia have showed enormous social, economic and environmental benefits from restoring reefs.

“To rebuild the reefs, we lay down thousands of tonnes of locally-sourced limestone rubble and recycled shells to create a reef base. Then we release millions of baby oysters bred by oyster farmers and shellfish hatcheries,” Dr Gillies said.

“During reef building, a variety of jobs are created, ranging from barge operators, to truck drivers, to shellfish growers and divers. After construction, the reefs will provide public benefits such as cleaner water and more fish for everyone.”

Minister for the Environment Sussan Ley said the new shellfish reefs will have a positive impact on local communities and the economy, while also protecting biodiversity.

“By investing in our natural assets, we help coastal tourism and the recreational and commercial fishing industries bounce back from the impacts of COVID-19 and bushfire.”

The Nature Conservancy aims to rebuild 60 reefs across southern Australia. This is Australia’s largest marine restoration initiative. If achieved, it will make Australia the first nation in the world to recover a critically endangered marine ecosystem. Eight projects have been completed or are near completion so far.

Reef Builder will restore reefs in at least 11 sites chosen from the following locations:

  • Noosa River Estuary, QLD
  • Port Stephens, NSW
  • Botany Bay, NSW
  • Sapphire Coast, NSW
  • Gippsland Lakes, VIC
  • Port Phillip Bay, VIC
  • Derwent Estuary, TAS
  • Kangaroo Island, SA
  • Adelaide Metro Coast, SA
  • Onkaparinga, SA
  • Oyster Harbour, WA
  • Peel Harvey Estuary, WA
  • Swan-Canning Estuary, WA

More information

  • Learn more about the project here.
  • Learn more about shellfish reefs here.
  • High resolution photos and footage of the reefs are available to download here.

 


 

Source: Eco Voice