Search for any green Service

Find green products from around the world in one place

Decade of the plant and the continued evolution of food

Decade of the plant and the continued evolution of food

More extensive ingredients are required for meat alternatives to provide the taste and texture of their counterparts. For example, Meatless Farm’s Chicken Breast relies on four proteins and fibres to replicate Ocado’s own brand Chicken Breast. This can create issues for manufacturers if protein supplies are disrupted, or when new legislation such as Natasha’s Law is introduced.

End-to-end ingredients management and tracking capabilities are essential to solve these problems at pain points, and future proof operations. A food-specific ERP solution is the ideal software to prepare businesses for an influx of demand for plant-based products, and the associated challenges.

 

Set competitive pricing by cultivating a plant-based strategy

There is a common misconception that plant-based products are exclusive. Both traditional food manufacturers such as Birds Eye, and unprocessed manufacturers such as Meati, are leaning into the market trend to support the full meat to non-meat eating spectrum. Among personal reasons for switching to plant-based alternatives are animal welfare and environmental concerns – but 31% of consumers consider a major positive impact on the climate as the single greatest reason for completing the switch. To tap into this eco-consciousness, food companies of all sizes need more sustainably sourced products – and this is where food-specific ERP solution comes in.

65% of vegan-alternative ready meals are more expensive than their meat counterparts, and with the current cost-of-living increase, affordability looks set to become critical for plant-based manufacturers. The ability to keep base pricing consistent is key to secure a foothold in the market, and a food-based ERP solution can automate shifts, production, and sanitation scheduling to help reduce unnecessary costs, encourage proactive planning, and free up staff for other tasks. Additional use of automated tools such as QR code scanners can help businesses collect ingredient information quickly and offset potentially costly lost sales.

 

Plant-based consumers will pay more for high-quality CX – and ERP systems can provide it!

Recent demand increases for fortified snacks such as those produced by Silk and So Delicious are indicative of a wider demographic change in the plant-based market. Vegan products are no longer just for vegans, and food businesses need to pivot their communication strategies accordingly. Today’s customers want their buying experiences to be like their personal ones, with an ability to research information online, compare offers, and request pricing at their own leisure. As digital marketplaces are readily available at the touch of a button, companies must now look to place their brand front and centre.

This has forced industry leaders to revisit their customer experience strategies to gain a competitive market edge. For instance, 86% of buyers are willing to pay more for a great customer experience, so there’s a clear incentive for plant-based leaders to opt for a Customer Relationship Management (CRM) system. Integration with a food-specific ERP system allows businesses to gain real-time accessibility and data sharing capabilities such as access to order history, buyer insights, and preferential analytics. Niche experience personalisation is critical for plant-based market gains, and CRM makes it easier to personalise plant-based product messaging to meet specific customer needs, turning more prospects into leads.

Maintain regulatory compliance and futureproof operations with the push of a button
Plant-based alternatives have been introduced by industry giants in the fast-food market to meet new demand. Yet, this has led to an increase in the number of recalls and allergen-related hospitalisations across the food industry, particularly within the food-to-go market. End-to-end ingredient traceability must remain a priority for businesses to ensure continual food safety – and technology can play a significant role.

More than 60% of consumers consider ingredient statements and nutritional panels when buying plant-based products. As plant-based alternatives have longer ingredient lists, there’s value in the industry developing cleaner, shorter labels on products with fewer, more familiar sounding ingredients.

An ERP food-specific solution allows businesses to collect and manage data from sources throughout the supply chain to sustain regulatory compliance. For instance, allergen management capabilities reduce the risk of cross-contamination and provide visibility into allergens across multiple sources by assessing the whole ingredient journey. Greater transparency over the entire supply chain ensures that businesses can provide up-to-date and accurate allergy labels to ensure consumers feel confident in their food choices.

 

Meat-free alternatives will only become more popular as the ‘decade of the plant’ takes hold

Cost of living increases and ingredient shortages are driving consumers to make smarter choices about the plant-based products they purchase. To stand out in a crowded market, food businesses should increase product sustainability and affordability, and a food-specific ERP system provides the supply chain transparency to do so.

 

 


 

 

Source Sustainability

 

Microsoft signs 10-year carbon removal deal with Climeworks

Microsoft signs 10-year carbon removal deal with Climeworks

The tech giant first announced an intention to source carbon removal solutions from Climeworks in January 2021, a year after pledging to achieve carbon-negative operations and supply chains by 2030. To achieve this 2030 goal, Microsoft – which is already carbon-neutral in operations – intends to halve emissions this decade and invest to offset and remove more carbon than it emits annually.

This week, Climeworks confirmed that it has entered into a ten-year purchase agreement with Microsoft. The investment in the deal has not been disclosed at this stage, but Climeworks claims it is “one of the largest” in the DAC space and will support the removal of “tens of thousands of tonnes of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere”.

“Microsoft’s multi-year offtake agreement with Climeworks is an important step towards realizing the ‘net’ in net zero,” said Microsoft’s chief environmental officer Lucas Joppa. “Our experience in purchasing renewable energy shows that long-term agreements can provide an essential foundation for society’s race to scale new decarbonisation technologies.”

 

Pictured: Climeworks’ Orca DAC plant in Iceland. Image: Climeworks

 

Other corporate supporters of Climeworks include Ocado, Swiss RE, Audi, LGT and Stripe, the latter of which is spearheading a collaborative private sector commitment on scaling carbon capture technologies. Called ‘Frontier’, the collaboration is backed by $925m of commitments to purchase carbon removals using man-made technologies this decade.

 

Technology scale-up

Climeworks currently operates 17 DAC plants, including one, Orca, which is operating on a commercial basis. Orca came online in September 2021 and is based in Hellisheiði, Iceland. Its CO2 removal capacity is 4,000 tonnes per year.

Last month, Climeworks confirmed plans for its 18th and largest plant to date – Mammoth, also in the same Icelandic region. The plant is expected to begin operations in either late 2023 or early 2024. In the first instance, it will have a CO2 capture capacity of 36,000 tonnes per year. Climeworks is aiming to scale to two megatonnes of capacity by 2030, laying the foundations for scaling to a gigatonne of capture capacity by 2050.

Climeworks’ technology works by drawing air into a collector with a fan. Inside the collector, CO2 is filtered out. When the filter is full, the collector is closed and heated to release the CO2, ready for concentration and storage by storage partner Carbfix. The carbon associated with developing and operating the DAC facilities, Climeworks claims, is typically equivalent to 10% of the carbon that will be captured. This calculation considers the fact that the facilities are powered by renewable energy.

Microsoft’s Joppa has called DAC “a nascent but crucial industry” to achieve the halving of net global emissions by 2030 and bringing them to net-zero by 2050 – the levels recommended by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) for giving humanity the best chance to limit the global temperature increase to 1.5C.

Indeed, some climate scientists have concluded that large-scale carbon capture – whether man-made or nature-based – is needed at scale to avert the worst physical impacts of climate change due to historic and continuing emissions. The IPCC itself has stated that, by 2050, the world’s air-based carbon removal capacity should be 3-12 billion tonnes in a net-zero world.

However, as Joppa acknowledged, man-made systems are in their relative infancy commercially. Critics are concerned that they may not deliver their promised benefits and could be used as a means for businesses to avoid reducing their emissions in the first instance.

 

ETC report

In related news, the Energy Transitions Commission (ETC) has this week published a new report outlining its recommendations for scaling carbon capture, storage and utilisation (CCUS) technologies while ensuring that efforts around zero-carbon electricity and emissions reductions are not de-prioritised.

That report forecasts that, in 2050, the world will need 7-10 gigatonnes of CO2 capture. This is at the higher end of the levels recommended by the IPCC. Reaching this scale, the ETC argues, cannot be dependent on action in the mid or long-term – concerted efforts are needed this decade, with the backing of both public and private finance.

Overall, the ETC sees a “vital but limited” role for CCUS. Its report sets out how the carbon removals provided by these technologies should be prioritised for sectors which are hard to decarbonise, such as heavy industry, and should be scaled most rapidly in the sectors and locations where CCUS has an economic advantage over other decarbonisation solutions.

The ETC has been a vocal supporter of CCUS in recent years. In March, it released a separate report recommending that the global CCUS capacity reaches 3.5 billion tonnes annually by 2030.

 


 

Source Edie

Waitrose and Lidl top list of eco-friendly supermarkets

Waitrose and Lidl top list of eco-friendly supermarkets

Waitrose and Lidl are the most sustainable supermarkets, according to a Which?’s eco-friendly grocer ranking.

Iceland finished last, according to the research, which tracked supermarket policies on: plastic waste and food waste, which shoppers have reported are the biggest issues for them; and greenhouse gas emissions, which most experts say poses the greatest environmental threat.

In its first such ranking, the consumer magazine pointed out that supermarkets respond to customer demand, so if shoppers make eco-friendly choices and demand sustainable options, this can influence shops to improve.

Harry Rose, editor of Which?, said: “We know that consumers increasingly want to shop sustainably and our in-depth analysis of three key areas shows that all the big supermarkets could be looking to make some improvements.

“The good news is shoppers can make a big difference themselves by adopting more sustainable habits, such as buying loose fruit and vegetables, buying seasonal local produce, eating less meat and dairy and limiting their own food waste.”

Lidl performed above its rivals on greenhouse gas emissions but fell short on food waste, though it said this is because it serves more fresh food in-store than many other comparable shops.

Waitrose has strong policies on plastic and food waste compared with other supermarkets, and scored reasonably for greenhouse gas emissions.

Iceland fell short because it was unable to report how much of its own-brand plastic is recyclable, so scored zero points. It also faces disadvantages as a frozen food specialist, as this made it the worst performer on operational greenhouse gas emissions due to its energy-draining in-store freezers. However, it does buy 100% renewable electricity for its UK sites.

Marks & Spencer was found to use a lot of plastic compared with other supermarkets. It was also the only one unable to provide its food waste data in a comparable format, so scored zero points for this, and was in the bottom half of Which?’s table for emissions.

For plastic use, the Co-op did best, while Ocado was the frontrunner in terms of food waste, as it redistributes almost all surplus food, leaving just 0.04% as waste.

 

Which?’s ranking of supermarkets’ green measures

1. Lidl – 74%
1. Waitrose – 74%
3. Asda – 71%
3. Sainsbury’s – 71%
5. Tesco – 69%
6. Morrisons – 68%
7. Aldi – 66%
8. Co-op – 65%
9. Ocado – 63%
10. Marks & Spencer – 48%
11. Iceland – 29%

 


 

Source Guardian