Search for any green Service

Find green products from around the world in one place

Indonesia sets eyes on becoming world’s geothermal superpower

Indonesia sets eyes on becoming world’s geothermal superpower

Straddling the seismically active Pacific Ring of Fire, Indonesia is one of the most geologically active countries in the world, with churning molten rock beneath the archipelago triggering about 1,000 tremors a month. The heat generated by movement in the Earth’s bowels can be harnessed. Where water seeps into the ground, it warms up, creating energy that can power homes and industry if you drill deep enough.

In 1904, Italian scientist Piero Ginori Conti became the first person to use this type of energy to power several light bulbs. More than a century later, geothermal power has become an important source of renewable electricity from the United States to the Philippines, but Indonesia wants to rise above them all.

Home to 40 per cent of the world’s geothermal resources, Indonesia’s government has identified more than 300 sites with an estimated 24 GW in geothermal energy reserves—the world’s largest—across islands including Sumatra, Java, Nusa Tenggara, Sulawesi and Maluku. Most of this remains untapped. Three years ago, it overtook the Philippines to become the second-largest geothermal power producer globally. Now, it only tails the United States, which has a capacity of 2.6 GW.

In a push to become the world’s geothermal powerhouse, Southeast Asia’s biggest economy aims to install 8 gigawatts (GW) of geothermal capacity by 2030, up from about 2.1 GW currently.

Geothermal plants use steam from underground reservoirs of hot water to spin a turbine, which drives a generator to produce electricity. An inexhaustible source of heat, geothermal is relatively clean and does not emit carbon dioxide or other greenhouse gases, doesn’t produce a lot of waste or make a large footprint on land. Unaffected by the whims of nature, geothermal can generate a stable baseload power around the clock to complement more variable output from other green sources, including wind and solar.

 

Geothermal power capacity in Indonesia, the Philippines, and the United States, 2011 – 2020. The US is the biggest geothermal power producer globally, followed by Indonesia and the Philippines. Source: IRENA

 

Indonesia has recognised that geothermal power must play a central role in its efforts to meet soaring energy demand, achieve its  goal of sourcing 23 per cent of its energy from renewables by 2025, and cut carbon emissions to net-zero by 2060.

Increasing domestic capacity will also help Indonesia cushion itself from the risks associated with its dependence on fossil fuel imports and associated price fluctuations while reducing fossil fuel subsidies, which gobble Rupiah 70.5 trillion (US$4.9 billion) a year.

Indonesia’s idea to draw energy from the bowels of the Earth goes back to the Dutch colonial era. Trial well drilling began at Java’s Kamojang crater as early as 1926, although it would take several more decades until the first generator was installed to produce electricity. By the mid-1980s, several geothermal plants were in operation and explorations on other islands were underway. In 2018, a consortium of Japanese and Indonesian firms completed the US$1.17 billion Sarulla project in North Sumatra, the world’s biggest geothermal power plant at the time with a capacity of 330 megawatts, enough to power 330,000 homes.

As of 2020, Indonesia had 19 existing geothermal working areas and 45 new working areas, while 14 areas had been earmarked for preliminary surveys and exploration, according to government data. A total of 16 geothermal power plants have been built.

 

A worker at Indonesia’s first geothermal field, Kawah Kamojang, in 1935. Image: Christoffel Hendrik Japing, CC BY-SA 3.0 via Wikipedia Commons

 

Investors stay away

Despite the sheer scale of its potential, the sector has experienced setbacks. The government’s plans for the industry largely hinge on private money, but major policy uncertainties and the government’s adverse pricing regime for renewables continue to deter investors and drive up costs, making geothermal projects less viable.

Due to this poor investment climate, the energy and mineral resources ministry conceded last year, progress on its ambition to install 7.2 GW of geothermal capacity by 2025, a target enshrined in its electricity procurement plan (RUPTL), will be delayed by five years. It is estimated that Indonesia will require US$15 billion in investment to meet this goal.

 

If Indonesia doesn’t develop a clearer framework, the sector will find it difficult to thrive.

Septia Buntara Supendi, manager, sustainable energy and energy efficiency, Asean Centre for Energy

 

The list of market restraints is long. Two key obstacles are the lack of favourable rates for the power that developers feed into the grid and the high upfront risks facing firms in the exploration stage. Drilling wells can be a gamble because companies never know exactly how big a geothermal reserve they will find. This clouds the economics of geothermal ventures.

“Pricing has been a problem for renewable energy in Indonesia, especially for geothermal energy, because the development costs are very high,” Florian Kitt, a Jakarta-based energy specialist at the Asian Development Bank told Eco-Business.

Complicating matters further is that geothermal resources are often found in remote areas, further increasing costs. The government will need to throw other renewables into the mix to achieve least-cost electricity generation, Kitt said.

“The government wants to be a world leader in geothermal energy, and it will eventually be, but right now it makes more sense to look at how to best diversify and green Indonesia’s energy supply to meet demand at least cost. Key is an affordable mix of geothermal, solar, wind, hydro, biomass, and other renewable energy sources,” he said.

Indonesia also hasn’t laid the necessary groundwork to draw investment. From inadequate grid management and cumbersome negotiation practices to poorly designed power purchase agreements, there are myriad barriers the nation needs to tackle, according to an ADB report released last year.

While the adoption of international best practices for planning, procurement, contracting and risk mitigation will likely bring down clean energy costs, the government has not adequately “taken into account the dependency of renewable energy costs on the broader regulatory and commercial environment”, according to the bank.

A recent report by the International Institute for Sustainable Development, an independent Canadian think tank, showed that out of the 75 power purchase agreements that clean energy firms had signed with government-owned utility company Perusahaan Listrik Negara (PLN) between 2017 and 2018, 36 per cent had not reached financial closing, and nearly 7 per cent had been terminated.

 

New hope

To plug the industry’s funding gap, the government has backed research on small-scale geothermal plants that come with smaller investment needs and risks compared to bigger facilities. The state also provides tax incentives and has streamlined previously tedious permit processes. In remote areas, it has engaged communities to improve public acceptance of geothermal development. Local opposition to geothermal plants has hamstrung projects in the past.

The government’s focus on de-risking geothermal exploration to incentivise private investment has been an important step towards increasing geothermal development, according to Kitt.

But a presidential regulation announced last year that is predicted to revitalise the renewables sector remains stuck in limbo. While a draft is on the table, the different ministries are still debating the budgetary impacts of the scheme as the Covid-19 pandemic continues wreaking havoc on the economy, soaking up government resources.

The regulation is meant to fix the pricing mechanism for geothermal power and mitigate early development risks through fiscal incentives and state-funded well drilling. Under the scheme, energy planners have also proposed a subsidy to close the gap between the geothermal power tariffs and PLN’s basic cost of electricity, a policy previously recommended by the ADB to encourage the state utility to buy more clean energy. At present, caps on PLN’s retail prices act as a strong disincentive for the firm to purchase anything but the lowest-cost electricity, which is typically coal-fired.

“There are massive opportunities in geothermal energy. The sector will be critical for Indonesia to achieve its sustainable energy ambitions,” said Septia Buntara Supendi, manager for sustainable energy and energy efficiency at the Asean Centre for Energy, a think tank based in Jakarta. “But if Indonesia doesn’t develop a clearer framework, the sector will find it difficult to thrive.”

 


 

By Tim Ha

Source Eco Business

ADB announces coal exit in draft energy policy

ADB announces coal exit in draft energy policy

After decades of pressure from environmental groups, the Asian Development Bank said it would ‘no longer finance new coal-fired capacity’. But activists charge that its new policy will pave the way for fossil gas development.

The Asian Development Bank (ADB) will cease financing new coal-fired power stations, it announced through its draft energy policy on Friday (7 May).

The multi-lateral lender’s new policy stated that it “will withdraw from financing new coal power and heat plants” and support its developing member-countries “to achieve a planned and rapid phase-out of coal in the Asia and Pacific region.”

According to the draft policy, the bank will not finance coal mining, oil and natural gas field exploration, drilling, or extraction activities.

In ADB’s last energy policy released in 2009, it said it would prioritise energy security and poverty reduction even if it meant tapping coal and natural gas-based power generation.

The revision of ADB’s policy comes 10 months after its management conceded that its energy policy “is no longer adequately aligned with the global consensus on climate change, ongoing global transformation of the energy sector, and operational priorities of ADB’s new Strategy 2030.”

 

While this new policy puts the brakes on coal financing, it still opens doors for fossil gas development.
Jasper Inventor, programme director, Greenpeace Southeast Asia

 

ADB’s independent evaluation department recommended in August 2020 that it formally withdraw from financing new coal-fired energy projects, a year after the bank’s former president Takehiko Nakao said that it was not yet ready to quit coal. The evaluation was based on an assessment of the bank’s energy policy over the past 10 years.

The evaluation report found that while the Philippines-headquartered bank has refrained from investing in coal-fired power plants, it now needs to align its policy to this practice and clarify its institutional position.

ADB last approved a coal power project eight years ago converting Pakistan’s Jamshoro plant to run on coal instead of heavy fuel oil.

It has also contributed to the funding of the 4,000 megawatt (MW) Tata Mundra coal-fired project in India, the 600MW Visayas Baseload and Masinloc coal project in the Philippines, and the 1,320MW Jamshoro coal project in Pakistan.

The bank declared in 2018 a shift to clean energy, backing US$2 billion worth of investment into renewable energy and energy efficiency, to meet a US$3 billion target for 2020. In March, it also set a target of US$80 billion worth of climate financing by 2030.

The draft new policy states that the lender will help developing nations to “mitigate the health and environmental impact of existing coal-fired power plants and district heating systems through financing of emission control technologies.”

 

Bank’s support for fossil gas remains 

Environmentalists see the new policy as a landmark decision, but are also pushing for the bank to declare that it will abandon funding of other fossil fuels in its final draft.

The draft policy serves as the basis for further consultations with ADB shareholders and the public until June 2021, before the finalised version will be submitted to the board of directors in October.

Glenn Ymata, energy campaigner of NGO Forum on ADB, said the bank is still gridlocked to liquified natural gas and gas finance, as well as harmful waste-to-energy incinerator projects, which all contribute to increasing concentrations of greenhouse gas emissions.

“We are expecting that the ADB will continue involving the civil society in finalising the draft because of the climate, environmental, social, and human rights imperatives,” Ymata said.

Greenpeace added ADB must not provide a loophole and opportunities for businesses to impede the transition to renewable energy by replacing coal with fossil gas.

“ADB’s new policy to stop coal financing is a long-delayed and incremental move. Communities throughout Asia have struggled for decades to demand ADB to stop financing dirty energy. While this new policy puts the brakes on coal financing, it still opens doors for fossil gas development,” said Jasper Inventor, programme director, Greenpeace Southeast Asia.

The bank has spent US$4.7 billion financing gas projects in the region, the majority allocated for gas-fired power plants (44 per cent), exploration and extraction (21 per cent), according to the analysis by the Fossil Free ADB coalition and Oil Change International.

Gas expansion was found by scientists to have played a larger role in increasing global emissions than coal in every year between 2013 and 2019.


By Hannah Alcoseba Fernandez

Source Eco Business