Search for any green Service

Find green products from around the world in one place

Last fully intact Arctic ice shelf in Canada collapses

Last fully intact Arctic ice shelf in Canada collapses

The Milne Ice Shelf is at the fringe of Ellesmere Island, in the sparsely populated northern Canadian territory of Nunavut.

“Above normal air temperatures, offshore winds and open water in front of the ice shelf are all part of the recipe for ice shelf break up,” the Canadian Ice Service said on Twitter when it announced the loss.

“Entire cities are that size. These are big pieces of ice,” Professor Luke Copland, a glaciologist at the University of Ottawa who was part of the research team studying the Milne Ice Shelf told Reuters Newsageny.

The shelf’s area shrank by about 80 square kilometres. By comparison, the island of Manhattan in New York covers roughly 60 square kilometres.

“This was the largest remaining intact ice shelf, and it’s disintegrated, basically,” Professor Copland said.

The Arctic has been warming at twice the global rate for the last 30 years, due to a process known as Arctic amplification.

 

However, this year, temperatures in the polar region have been intense.

Reuters reports the polar sea ice hit its lowest extent for July in 40 years as record heat and wildfires  scorched Siberian Russia.

Summer in the Canadian Arctic this year in particular has been five degrees Celsius above the 30-year average, Professor Copland said.

That has threatened smaller ice caps, which can melt quickly because they do not have the bulk that larger glaciers have to stay cold.

As a glacier disappears, more bedrock is exposed, which then heats up and accelerates the melting process.

“The very small ones, we’re losing them dramatically,” he said, citing researchers’ reviews of satellite imagery.

“You feel like you’re on a sinking island chasing these features, and these are large features. It’s not as if it’s a little tiny patch of ice you find in your garden.”

The ice shelf collapse on Ellesmere Island also meant the loss of the northern hemisphere’s last known epishelf lake, a geographic feature in which a body of freshwater is dammed by the ice shelf and floats atop ocean water.

A research camp, including instruments for measuring water flow through the ice shelf, was lost when the shelf collapsed.

“It is lucky we were not on the ice shelf when this happened,” said researcher Associate Professor Derek Mueller of Carleton University in Ottawa, in a blog post.

Ellesmere also lost its two St Patrick Bay ice caps this summer.

“We saw them going, like someone with terminal cancer. It was only a matter of time,” said Professor Mark Serreze, director of the National Snow and Ice Data Centre (NSIDC) in Boulder, Colorado.

Professor Serreze and other NSIDC scientists had published a 2017 study predicting the ice caps were likely to disappear within five years.

The ice caps were believed to have formed several centuries ago.

The vanishing was confirmed last month, when NASA satellite shots of the region revealed a complete lack of snow and ice, said Professor Serreze, who studied the caps as a graduate student on his first trip to the Arctic years ago.

At the time, he said, the caps had seemed like immovable parts of the geography.

“When I was there in the 1980s I knew every square inch of those ice caps,” he said. “You have the memories.”

Meanwhile, another two ice caps on Ellesmere, called Murray and Simmons, are also diminishing and are likely to disappear within 10 years, Professor Serreze said.

 


 

New Analysis Shows How Electrifying the U.S. Economy Could Create 25 Million Green Jobs by 2035

New Analysis Shows How Electrifying the U.S. Economy Could Create 25 Million Green Jobs by 2035

A report released Wednesday by a new nonprofit—in the midst of the coronavirus pandemic, the resulting economic disaster, and calls for a green recovery from those intertwined crises that prioritizes aggressive climate policies—lays out how rapidly decarbonizing and electrifying the U.S. economy could create up to 25 million good-paying jobs throughout the country over the next 15 years.

Mobilizing for a Zero Carbon America envisions a dramatic transformation of the nation’s power, transportation, building, and industrial sectors by 2035 to meet the global heating goals of the 2015 Paris climate agreement. The first project of the newly launched Rewiring America is “based on an extensive industrial and engineering analysis of what such a decarbonization would entail.”

The report details a two-stage “maximum feasible transition” (MFT) that would involve a World War II-style production ramp-up for three to five years, followed by “an intensive deployment of decarbonized infrastructure and technology up to 2035,” which would include both supply-side generation technologies and demand-side technologies like electric vehicles.

In addition to creating millions of green jobs in the wake of a public health crisis that has left tens of millions of Americans unemployed and helping the country contribute to the goals of the Paris accord—which President Donald Trump started withdrawing from last November—the report says that the MFT approach would save households nationwide up to thousands of dollars in annual energy costs.

“While government investment will be critical to the transition, private capital also has a large role to play,” a summary document from the group says. “The study estimates the government’s share of overall costs to be about $300 billion per year for 10 years for an approximate total of $3 trillion, mostly in the form of loans and/or loan guarantees to spur lending, akin to similar loan systems that the government has created in the past.”

“We can power our homes by the sun, charge our cars from clean energy while we sleep, and rethink city streets as we know them. In the process, we can create 25 million jobs in America. The only thing standing in the way is a leadership vacuum,” lead author Saul Griffith, an engineer and inventor who was awarded the MacArthur “Genius Grant” in 2007, said in a statement.

Griffith, founder and chief scientist of the independent research and development lab Otherlab, joined with Alex Laskey, president and founder of the software company Opower, to launch Rewiring America, which focuses on decarbonization in the U.S. The report, co-authored by Massachusetts Institute of Technology physicist Sam Calisch, is part of a forthcoming book by Griffith.

“I think the best way to describe what needs to happen politically is we need a president and some level of bipartisanship that will enable FDR levels of urgency in action,” Griffith told Fast Company. “And you could use either FDR’s response to the Great Depression or to World War II as your measure of that, but I think it’s actually more analogous to the World War II effort in terms of the speed of industrialization to win that war.”

 

As Fast Company reported:

The report attempts to make the idea of a Green New Deal more concrete. “I think all of the various Green New Deals and aspirational climate plans are narratively in the right direction, but we need to give them some ground truths and build some reality to them about what needs to happen from the ground up,” he says. “Those aspirations are great, but this is actually what you now need to do to get there. I think this is one of the first analyses that really builds out that model from the ground up of what has to happen in order to keep this on target for two degrees.”

The changes would also mean lower energy costs for consumers, and the report calculates that the average American household would save between $1,000 and $2,000 a year. Everyday life wouldn’t necessarily change significantly. “We now have technologies that are transformative, meaning you can now roughly have the same size and shape car, but electric,” Griffith says. “You can have the same size and shape house, but it will be run with electric heat pumps instead of the natural gas furnace. And if we have the sort of that spirit of can-do that America had mid-20th century, there’s every reason to believe that our lives improve when we do this, and we can have and live something like the American dream. It’ll just be electrified, not fossil-fueled.”

 

Leaders of the Sunrise Movement—a youth climate organization that advocates for the Green New Deal—endorsed the findings of Rewiring America’s report, as did Sen. Brian Shatz (D-Hawaii), former Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Carol Browner, Niskanen Center director of climate policy Joseph Majku, and Mike Fishman, past secretary-treasurer of Service Employees International Union and current president of Clean Jobs New York.

“The Rewiring America team asked the question: ‘What would happen if we actually tried to transition all of the infrastructure in American society over the next 15 years to stay within the 1.5ºC safe upper limit of global warming?'” said Evan Weber, co-founder and political director of the Sunrise Movement. “The answer they found is that would save consumers and society money, and it would create lots and lots and lots of jobs—around 25 million of them.”

The report comes a couple weeks after presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden unveiled a $2 trillion green energy plan that progressive climate advocates, including Sunrise, welcomed as a “a major step forward.” Biden’s job-creating plan calls for a power sector free of carbon pollution by 2035.

Sunrise executive director Varshini Prakash served on a unity task force launched by Biden and his former primary rival Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who won Sunrise’s endorsement. She welcomed Biden’s recent proposal while also promising that her group will work to ensure he actually delivers on it if he wins.

Prakash also welcomed the analysis Wednesday, noting that “for so long we’ve been sold the lie that we have to choose between good jobs and a safe environment, that our generation has to choose between a livable planet and a thriving, equitable economy.”

“The Rewiring America Plan puts that lie to rest once and for all,” she said. “This report is a critical contribution that shows that urgently achieving an all-society clean energy future by 2035 is not only necessary and achievable, but will make the world that young people inherit more prosperous.”

“We can achieve a just transition to a better world out of the wreckage of this economic crisis, with good union jobs for all, including low-income communities and communities of color,” she added. “The only thing standing in the way is political will.”

 


 

By 

Source: EcoWatch

Singapore startup claims breakthrough in Lithium-ion battery recycling

Singapore startup claims breakthrough in Lithium-ion battery recycling

A Singapore-based startup claims to have found a solution to the world’s electronic waste problem—a new way to recycle the rechargeable batteries that power portable electronics and electric vehicles.

The company, called Green Li-ion, says its technology can recycle Lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries much faster than conventional processes, using less energy and producing less waste. It is touted as the only technology in the world capable of fully recovering the precious metals in the cathode component of batteries.

Green Li-ion says its GLMC-1 system could be a game-changer for electronics manufacturers and the energy storage industry, which faces a looming waste crisis and increasing scrutiny from regulators.

Some two million metric tonnes of Li-ion battery waste is projected to be generated annually by 2030 as demand for portable gadgets and electric cars balloons.

The lifespan of Li-ion batteries is typically one to three years, and 95 per cent of portable power packs end up in landfill as flammable toxic waste that can contaminate soil and groundwater.

Though recyclable, Li-ion batteries are difficult and expensive to recycle, and the electronics industry has focused on extending battery life and charge capacity rather than recyclability.

Green Li-ion’s technology can recover precious metals two to three times faster than conventional recycling methods and produce recycled content that is freer of impurities.

Typically, electronics recyclers need to ship battery waste to Japan, the global hub for the battery industry, where the precious metals are separated and recovered. Green Li-ion’s technology uses a chemical process that does not separate out the metals, so the raw material can be re-used in a fraction of the time.

The chemical process used is a special form of co-precipitation, a method for refining chemicals.

The technology is also unique in that it can handle various types of Li-ion batteries, so no sorting is required.

The GLMC-1 system increases the efficiency of battery recycling by more than 200 per cent with a carbon footprint that is eight times lower than if the raw materials were mined, its developers say.

An individual machine can process two tonnes of spent batteries a day, costs in the region of US$2 million and takes around six months to install.

The technology was developed by Dr Reza Katal, who graduated from the National University of Singapore with a doctorate in environmental engineering in 2016, and co-founded Green Li-ion in February this year.

It is backed by NUS Professor Seeram Ramakrishna, who chairs the university’s Circular Economy Taskforce. He said the system is noteable for driving recycling efficiency and lowering the carbon footprint of recycling technologies.

Green Li-ion raised US$400,000 in pre-seed funding from investors including incubator Entrepreneur First, and says it is in talks with a number of e-recyclers in Singapore to get its machines up and running.

“We’re modest but ambitious,” Green Li-ion co-founder Leon Farrant told Eco-Business. “We want to have three machines deployed in 2021. And we want to sell 93 machines by 2025, which would cover all of the world’s major recycling locations globally.”

Farrant said that he hopes to have a machine operational in Singapore ahead of the introduction of a planned extended producer responsibility (EPR) scheme next year, which makes electronics manufacturers responsible for the collection and recycling of their products after they’ve been used.

 


 

By Robin Hicks

Source: Eco-business

BP to Cut Oil and Gas Production 40%, Invest 10x More in Green Energy

BP to Cut Oil and Gas Production 40%, Invest 10x More in Green Energy

BP, the energy giant that grew from oil and gas production, is taking its business in a new direction, announcing Tuesday that it will slash its oil and gas production by 40 percent and increase its annual investment in low-carbon technology to $5 billion, a ten-fold increase over its current level, according to CNN.

Despite losing $16.8 billion in the second quarter of 2020, the ambitious plan to become a leading purveyor of clean energy sent the company’s share price soaring 7 percent Tuesday, as The New York Times reported.

“This coming decade is critical for the world in the fight against climate change, and to drive the necessary change in global energy systems will require action from everyone,” BP said in a statement, as CNN reported.

As part of its plan, the company will stop its oil and gas exploration in new countries and reduce its current production and carbon emissions by one-third, as The Washington Post reported.

In a discussion with analysts on Tuesday, BP’s Chief Executive Bernard Looney set his company apart from its European counterparts, which have made vague commitments to address the climate crisis. Looney’s pledge to invest around $5 billion a year in renewable energy like wind, solar and hydrogen, a clean-burning gas, made it the first oil and gas giant to specify its investment goal, according to The New York Times.

“This makes the BP the first supermajor to spell out, in detail, what the energy transition will actually entail, in practical terms,” said Pavel Molchanov, senior energy analyst for the investment firm Raymond James, to The Washington Post.

“BP today introduces a new strategy that will reshape its business as it pivots from being an international oil company focused on producing resources to an integrated energy company focused on delivering solutions for customers,” the company said, as Reuters reported.

The company expects demand for fossil fuels to fall by 75 percent by 2050, if the increase in global temperatures is limited to 1.5 degrees Celsius, or by 50 percent if warming is less than 2 degrees, BP head of strategy Giulia Chierchia told investors, as CNN reported.

BP said its will cut its oil and gas production by at least one million barrels a day by 2030, a 40 percent reduction from 2019 levels, as CNN reported.

While the company will dramatically expand its portfolio of clean energy technologies, the next five years will see BP continue to invest most of its money in oil and gas production, according to CNN.

“We believe our new strategy provides a comprehensive and coherent approach to turn our net zero ambition into action,” Looney said in a statement Tuesday, as The Washington Post reported.

The investment in low-carbon initiatives is set to jump to more than $3 billion by 2025 and $5 billion by 2030, “en route to 50 gigawatts of renewable generation capacity by 2030 alongside scale-up of other clean tech businesses,” Molchanov said, as The Washington Post reported.

The company sees a profitable future in providing clean energy to cities. According to The Washington Post, BP plans to advise cities on “power packages” with renewables, back-up batteries and financing. It also will also start to offer electric vehicle recharging stations at its retail gasoline stations.

Oswald Clint, an analyst at Bernstein, a market research firm, told The New York Times that BP’s plans were “peer-leading” and that its potential to smoothly manage large projects in the renewables area was “underappreciated.”

Environmental activists were lukewarm about the plans. Greenpeace UK described the announcement as a “necessary and encouraging start,” but said BP must go further. “BP has woken up [to] the immediate need to cut carbon emissions this decade,” senior climate campaigner Mel Evans said in a statement, as CNN reported.

 


 

By 

Source: EcoWatch

Ocean plastics: The ecological disaster of our time

Ocean plastics: The ecological disaster of our time

Did you know that of the 8 billion tons of plastic ever made, every single piece still exists?
(AAAS & Center for Biological Diversity)

Really take this in for a second….

Think about every toothbrush, every plastic razor, plastic bag or “disposable” water bottle, every straw, plastic cup…every shampoo bottle you’ve ever used.  Every. Single. One.  Now consider that with an estimated lifetime of at least 450 years, plastic will outlive you as well as your great-great-great-great-grandchildren.  At worst case – it will NEVER go away.  As both the human population and plastic production continue to increase, we are all living now in our own plastic waste.

If anything can attest to the issue of plastics – it is Earth’s oceans.  It is estimated that the ocean contains 5.25 trillion pieces of plastic while 99.9% of floating marine debris is plastic.  Much of this plastic is found in ocean gyres, massive surface currents that circulate in each of Earth’s major oceans.  Plastic gets funneled into theses currents where it collects, forming what scientists refer to as trash islands.  Currently, each ocean gyre contains its own island of trash.

 

 

While these plastic patches of marine debris are called garbage islands, this name can be misleading.  The term may conjure mental images of large floating structures, yet much plastic exists as nurdles, microplastics less than 5mm inches in size.  Nurdles form through photochemical reactions with sunlight, a process commonly referred to as dry rot and can be further broken down by wind and wave action.  Other plastics begin small, such as the microbeads found in many cosmetic items or plastic fibers found in our clothing and textiles.  These tiny plastics create what is commonly referred to as “plastic soup,” however larger plastics are found in the gyres as well including plastic containers, bottles, lids, rope, packaging, and discarded fishing equipment.

Perhaps the best known of these gyres is the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, currently measuring in at twice the size of Texas.  Like all plastic islands, the Pacific Garbage Patch is growing.  Recent findings suggest that Pacific plastic pollution is 16 times higher than previously reported and based on data collected by boats or air, is estimated to weigh a total of 80,000 tonnes.  As plastics revolve around the Pacific trash vortex, they entangle marine organisms or are consumed by them.

Plastic islands are only one observable aspect of ocean pollution, yet no square mile of ocean is free of plastic.  It is estimated that of all the ocean plastic, only 30% is found at the surface while the rest sinks to the ocean depths.

 

 

For animals that live in the ocean, these plastics are often detrimental.  Because plastics don’t break down, they remain intact in the bellies of the animals that consume them — leading to malnutrition and eventually starvation.  Plastic is the cause of death to one million seabirds worldwide while another 100,000 marine animals die due to starvation or entanglement in ocean plastics.

Regardless of your proximity to the sea, ocean plastics affect us all.  The ocean plays a vital role in the transport of heat and nutrients, controlling Earth’s climate and supporting our planet’s largest and most diverse ecosystems.  Ocean plankton produces 70% of Earth’s oxygen while nearly 3 billion people worldwide – almost half of the global population, rely on seafood for their primary source of protein. Furthermore, 10% of people globally rely on healthy fisheries for their livelihoods while the oceans contribute an estimated U$D1.5 trillion annually to the world’s economy.  The oceans are also a vital carbon sink, removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere to reduce the impacts of global climate change.  Despite the oceans’ importance, plastic is projected to outweigh the fish in the ocean by 2050.

Ocean plastic should be of particular concern to those of us who enjoy seafood.  Microplastics or plastic fibers are often consumed by fish or shellfish before working their way up the food chain.  Scientists who study plastic pollution in shellfish claim “when you eat clams and oysters, you’re eating plastics as well” while several fish species are also expected to contain plastics.  Plastic releases numerous toxins such as bisphenol-A and phthalates, compounds are known to cause cancers and birth defects, impair immunity, and disrupt our bodies’ endocrine system.  Not only are plastics themselves harmful, but they also act like a sponge to ocean pollutants.  Toxic metalsdetergentspesticides, and other marine pollutants have also been found adsorbed on ocean plastics.

 

 

Ocean plastics are expected to increase up to 3 times their current amount by 2050 and while these projections sound stark, there are several things we can all do in order to reduce the issue.  Most ocean plastic, an estimated 80%, originates on land.  As land-dwellers, we all must do our best to decrease the amount of plastic entering our oceans.  This can be accomplished through recycling or better yet, just simply buying less plastic.

Reducing your plastic use can sound a tad overwhelming, but I am here to assure you that it is not only is it possible but relatively easy once in the habit!  Plastic is everywhere, consciously acknowledging this fact is half the battle. Once you become aware of your plastic use, it is much easier to decrease it.  Think about the plastic products you use on a normal basis and how you could use less.

When cutting plastic consumption, start by reducing your use of single-use plastics.  Single-use plastics are exactly what they sound like – plastics that are used only once then discarded.  Water bottles, straws, plastic bags, coffee cups, and plastic silverware are typical culprits, though nearly half of all plastic produced each year is considered “disposable”.  Thankfully, you can easily purchase sustainable products to replace these single-use plastics.  Considering the fact that the average plastic is typically only 12 minutes or that one million water bottles sold every minute, replacing these items with reusables can make a massive difference.  You can even buy reusable straws or silverware to prevent any unwanted single-use plastics.  Joining groups like the Plastic Pollution Coalition, the Green Education Foundation, or Plastic Free July can help to further educate and inspire on your path towards less plastic.

 

 

The fishing industry also plays a massive role in ocean plastics, and scientists were surprised to discover that, by weight, 46% of the plastics found in the Pacific Garbage Patch exist as or originate from discarded fishing gear.  Fishing gear is especially dangerous because it is specifically designed to capture and kill marine organisms.  To prevent the loss of fishing gear, a detrimental practice known as ghost fishing, support sustainable fisheries.  Seafood Watch, an organization of The Monterey Bay Aquarium has compiled a list of sustainable seafood species and partners, which can be found here.  Divers can also play a role by joining ghost fishing removal groups, like the Ghost Fishing Foundation.

So, what can you do to help? If you would like to contribute financially, our oceans would greatly appreciate it. We would recommend supporting Boyan Slat’s Ocean Cleanup. Boyan is the Elon Musk of marine sustainability. Since 18 years of age, he has gone to battle with the largest collection of ocean plastics on planet Earth: the Great Pacific Garbage patch. If you do not believe in the effectiveness of the NGO charity model (which is a belief that has valid points) – there are plenty of for-profit organizations that are saving the planet as a by-product of their business operations. The Brothers of iDiveblue like the concept behind 4Ocean– but if you have your doubts, we have written a review of the 4Ocean Initiative.

However, money is not the be-all and end-all. Many people want to help save our oceans but feel despondent because they just don’t have the money to donate. You can make a difference without money! How are you using Tupperware and shopping bags? What straws do you use? Do we even need straws? And what about your voice?

Perhaps one of the best things we can do is lead by example and educate others about the plastic problem.  Many are unaware of the detrimental impacts of single-use plastics and have genuinely never considered it.  Educate your friends and loved ones and don’t allow yourself to become discouraged!  Every small step makes a difference.  If we can all find one change to make it will have a serious impact on ocean plastics.

Plastic today is a serious but solvable issue.  Plastic has been detected in hundreds of food items, sea salt, beer, and in both bottled and tap water.  Toxins from these plastics have been found in our blood, and even breast milk.  Not only do these plastics harm us, but they also continue to have a detrimental effect on marine organisms and one of our greatest resources — the sea.  Furthermore, plastics are typically made from oil, a nonrenewable resource whose extraction is detrimental to the environment.  Currently, 8% of all oil is used for plastics and this number is expected to reach 20% by 2050. Plastics degrade our environment, consume valuable fossil fuels, and impact our health, but through personal action to reduce plastic use and educate others about the harmful consequences of plastics, we can all work towards a healthier and sustainable future.

 

 

REACH OUT

We always speak about ‘They’. They need to do something about the plastic problem. They need to stop overfishing. What They are doing to our oceans is simply unacceptable. But who are They?

The government? The government is an administrative body elected by the people. The government exists only to serve out the needs of those people. They is in fact our society, a collection of individuals. You are one of those individuals, and so am I. There is no They, there is only We, and We are all part of the problem. However, We can choose to be part of the solution instead. Sure, sometimes it feels like one individual has such a small chance of creating meaningful change – so why bother. But remember, if everyone had that mindset, there is 100% chance that nothing will change.

We only have one Earth. We can make a difference.

You have a Part to Play – join us in our fight against the Ecological Disaster of our Age.

 


 

By Laura Foley

Source: IDIVEBLUE