NET Power Archives - Zureli

Search for any green Service

Find green products from around the world in one place

Window cleaning

Singapore Safety Glass

Pilot Energy puts blue hydrogen before green with “first-to-market” CCS technology

Posted on March 29, 2022 by dishanth

ASX-listed gas junior Pilot Energy says feasibility studies have confirmed “significant opportunity” to develop a large-scale hydrogen production project using gas and novel carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology first, and renewables later, in Western Australia’s mid-west region.

Pilot said in a statement on Monday that the studies, commenced last year, aimed to assess the economic and logistical feasibility of developing a large-scale “clean” – but certainly not green – production project using the company’s existing oil and gas production operations.

Broadly, the company said the results showed Pilot was “well positioned to play a significant role in the energy transition through harnessing the world-class CCS and renewable resources of the Mid West region of Western Australia.”

More specifically, the studies found that the existing Cliff Head Oil Field offshore facilities, wells and pipelines were already suitable for CCS to the tune of 6.4 million tonnes of CO2 at an injection rate of 500,000 tonnes of CO2 per annum.

Pilot holds a 21.25% interest in the Cliff Head Oil Field through its 50% ownership of Triangle Energy, the operator of the Cliff Head Oil Field. The CCS and blue hydrogen feasibility study is being jointly funded by Pilot, APA Group and Warrego Energy.

Pilot said that the feasibility studies also highlighted the Mid West region could produce “clean ammonia” on a globally competitive basis for export into emerging Asian clean energy markets.

The company said the next steps would be to progress into the permitting and approvals process and front-end engineering and design for a staged development of commercialising CCS and blue hydrogen leveraging technology from US cleantech firm 8 Rivers.

8 Rivers Capital has been working on development of gas plants in the US using the proprietary technology of a company called Net Power, of which it is a co-owner, that burns natural gas with pure oxygen instead of air, producing only CO2 and water as byproducts. Excess CO2 is captured, “pipeline-ready,” for underground storage.

This will no doubt please the federal Morrison government, which as Pilot notes has prioritised CCS in its Technology Investment Roadmap, in the hope that CO2 compression, transport and storage can meet a “stretch target” of under $20 per tonne.

But whether this counts as “clean hydrogen” production is highly questionable, particularly after factoring in the emissions along the gas exploration and production life cycle.

Increasingly, the true “colour” of hydrogen, particularly in the export market, will determine its competitiveness in the market, with a premium being placed on renewables derived green hydrogen as businesses and governments reach for ambitious climate targets.

Still, Pilot Energy chair Brad Lingo welcomed the results of the studies, saying they outlined a clear multi-stage development path, starting with CCS and “building off this platform,” to produce clean power and hydrogen for domestic use and for export, as low-cost “clean” ammonia.

“This staged development path is very much in the reach of the company in terms of financial capacity and technical delivery taking advantage of the existing Cliff Head Oil Field infrastructure and operations,” Lingo said.

“The Company is very focused on delivering a First-to-Market CCS Project in the Mid West to anchor the further development of a Clean Hydrogen/ Ammonia and Renewable Energy Project.

“We are very much focused on engaging with NOPTA and the other relevant regulators to secure the necessary approvals to implement this project with an aim of having the first stage of the development pathway operational by 2025 and generating positive cash flow from these operations as well as delivering a material impact on carbon emissions in the Mid West,” he said.

Source Renew Economy

SpaceX’s Elon Musk is going into the carbon capture business

Posted on January 11, 2022 by dishanth

SpaceX and Tesla CEO Elon Musk, who is Time magazine’s current Person of the Year, is often accused of neglecting problems on Earth in favor of conducting his private space program. The accusation is unfair on a number of levels. After all, Musk also runs an electric car company. Now, the space entrepreneur has announced on Twitter a new initiative that may prove flying into space could also benefit the Earth.

“SpaceX is starting a program to take CO2 out of atmosphere & turn it into rocket fuel. Please join if interested,” he tweeted.

Human-caused climate change, created by the emission of greenhouse gasses such as carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, is an obsession with many both in government and in the media. Musk’s proposal has interesting implications for the issue and the accusations that he wants to abandon Earth to go live on Mars. The project will not only help alleviate climate change on Earth but will be instrumental to Musk’s desire to build a settlement on Mars.

Making rocket fuel with CO2 is the easy part of the proposal. A century-old process invented by a Nobel Prize-winning chemist named Paul Sabatier combines CO2 with hydrogen and a catalyst to create methane and water. Musk’s rocket being developed by SpaceX in Boca Chica, Texas uses engines that burn liquid methane and liquid oxygen. NASA uses the Sabatier system on the International Space Station (ISS) to create water for the crew. The methane is vented from the ISS.

The first part of Musk’s plan, sucking CO2 out of the atmosphere, is likely to be more challenging. The idea that carbon capture from the air would reduce the Earth’s greenhouse gasses and thus alleviate climate change is a controversial one. One such project, reported by Techcrunch, is being conducted by a company called Climeworks in Iceland. Thus far, the company spends between $600 and $800 to remove a ton of carbon dioxide, which is considered prohibitively expensive. Climeworks wants to reduce the cost to between $100 and $200 a metric ton (also known as tonne) to make the project more economically feasible.

Another form of carbon capture involves sequestering CO2 directly from power plants. Indeed, NET Power has a pilot plant a few hours’ drive away from Boca Chica in La Porte, Texas. It burns natural gas but saves and store the CO2 emissions. Could Musk buy the CO2 he needs from the NET plant or a similar source? Perhaps, but ever the environmentalist, the Musk might be reluctant to ship the gas to Boca Chica by diesel-fueled tanker truck. Would Tesla be interested in developing an electric-powered tanker truck?

In any case, Musk is interested in developing both the carbon capture from the air and the Sabatier technologies for his planned Mars settlement. The idea is to capture CO2 from the Martian atmosphere, hydrogen from water ice, and then convert them to rocket fuel for spacecraft headed back to Earth from the Red Planet.

Musk has funded a $100 million X-Prize to encourage development of carbon capture technologies, noting that “to win the grand prize, teams must demonstrate a working solution at a scale of at least 1000 tonnes removed per year; model their costs at a scale of 1 million tonnes per year; and show a pathway to achieving a scale of gigatonnes per year in future.”

If and when a direct air capture solution is achieved, a win-win result will have been achieved. Human civilization will have available one or more technologies that will go a long way toward solving the climate crisis. Musk will have a source of CO2 to make his own rocket fuel and continue pursuing his grand design to build a Mars settlement, not to mention taking humans back to the moon and a number of other goals.

A rocket whose engines burn liquid methane and liquid oxygen will create water and CO2 in its exhaust. But a world that has technology that can capture carbon from the atmosphere will likely be more than able to handle the situation.

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) has denounced carbon capture as a “false solution.” But the delicious irony is that while Green New Dealers concoct schemes to deal with climate change that involve destroying the fossil fuels industry, billionaire capitalists such as Musk are developing solutions that do not involve such a wrenching, economic calamity. Musk and people like him are more likely to succeed where politicians and activists are certain to fail. Musk promises to save the Earth and go to Mars.

Mark R. Whittington is the author of space exploration studies “Why is It So Hard to Go Back to the Moon?” as well as “The Moon, Mars and Beyond,” and “Why is America Going Back to the Moon?” He blogs at Curmudgeons Corner.

Source The Hill