Search for any green Service

Find green products from around the world in one place

She’s making shampoo more sustainable by eliminating the most useless ingredient in it – water

She’s making shampoo more sustainable by eliminating the most useless ingredient in it – water

Did you know that 80 per cent of our regular shampoo is made of water? This water however does not enhance the formula in any way. On the contrary, it dilutes the product so consumers need a larger quantity for a single wash.

“The thing is, when you shampoo, you still need to wet your hair to lather the product. So why do we need to add water to the shampoo formula in the first place?” said Lynn Tan, founder of The Powder Shampoo.

“Also, why are we transporting gallons and gallons of liquid shampoo around the world? The water makes it heavier than it needs to be. And because of the liquid, brands usually use single-use plastic to store the product. It is all so unnecessary.”

Her solution is so logical, it is a wonder no big brands have picked up on it sooner. To reduce single-use plastic and the carbon footprint of transporting products – simply subtract water from the formula.

This April, Tan will launch four variants of Singapore’s very first powder shampoo. Don’t confuse these for dry shampoo, which you sprinkle on your scalp to absorb excess oil. Tan has designed her product to be applied directly to wet hair for the full lathering shampoo experience.

 

THE POWDER REVOLUTION

Beauty insiders will know Tan. The 43-year-old runs a distribution business BBN International, which specialises in botanical brands such as Phyto, Lierac and Trilogy.

In early 2021 however, as she was watching Netflix documentaries on sustainability, she felt increasingly shaken and saddened, and began asking questions about the beauty industry – especially the need for single-use plastic bottles in personal care products.

“Only 9 per cent of plastic is recycled; 12 per cent is incinerated, which releases toxic fumes into the air. The rest is living among us.

“This plastic harms our ecosystem, birds, animals and sea creatures. It also becomes microplastic, goes in the air we breathe and the water we drink, and affects our lungs, brain, nervous system and reproductive system. A lot of reports show that plastic is poisoning us,” she said.

“This led me to wonder if there will be a beautiful earth left for my children, my grandchildren and everyone’s grandchildren if we keep going like this,” added the mother-of-three.

 

Tapping into her extensive haircare expertise, Lynn Tan created Singapore’s first powder shampoo and tweaked the formula 10 times to get it right. (Photo: The Powder Shampoo)

 

It also dawned upon Tan that she has been part of the problem. “As a business owner, you want to sell as much as you can, as often as you can, to as many people as you can. However, the more I sell, the more I contribute to this plastic plague,” she reflected.

“While a lot of us are trying to be eco-friendly, it is so hard because we have very limited sustainable options. You can shampoo less, pick products that use recycled plastic packaging (but these can only be recycled once), or use shampoo bars.”

While shampoo bars were a good option, Tan did not enjoy the experience. She wanted a sustainable product that was “easy to use, lathers nicely and smells amazing”.

Tan decided to go to the drawing board to create her own product from scratch. And so The Powder Shampoo was born.

 

WHY SWITCH TO POWDER?

Tan’s product is not the first powder shampoo. Over the past couple of years, a handful of cult brands from the US, UK and New Zealand have launched similar products.

Most consumers, however, aren’t even aware of them. And Tan’s goal is to create more awareness and more options.

“This should be a new movement and new category because you would reduce so much single-use plastic just by switching to powder,” she said.

Tan also stressed that powder shampoos are longer lasting, reduce overconsumption and are more cost effective as compared to liquid shampoos. “You only need 0.5g to wash short hair, 1g to wash shoulder length hair, and 1.5g to 2g to wash thick long hair. Our 100g bottle can last for 100 washes, which means you only need to buy a new bottle in three to six months,” she said.

She added: “In comparison, a 100ml bottle of liquid shampoo only lasts for 10 washes on average. Most liquid shampoos are 250ml to 500ml and only last for one to two months.”

The Powder Shampoos water-free formulas are easy to use, gentle on your scalp and hair, and leave it feeling soft and bouncy after each wash.

A self-confessed aromatherapy junkie, Tan incorporated micro-encapsulated essential oils such as bergamot, grapefruit, tea tree and mint into the products. These double as a natural preservative, giving the paraben-free products a shelf life of two years after opening.

She also uses a biodegradable coconut-based ingredient as a sulphate-free surfactant to thoroughly cleanse the scalp.

 

 

Tan has taken pains to ensure her shampoos are free of common controversial ingredients. These include: Parabens and phthalates, which Tan believes harms the body; silicone, which may clog pores and harm marine creatures when it goes into the water stream; sulphates, retinol, artificial fragrances and mineral oils, which may irritate sensitive skin.

The products are vegan and cruelty-free. “There is no need to use animal byproducts when we have so many options in the plant world. And there is certainly no need to test products on non-consenting animals when there are so many people willing to volunteer to try the product,” stressed Tan, who tested her products on 100 friends and colleagues from Singapore, Canada, Europe, the Philippines and China, to ensure that they suit different climates, hair types and types of water – including hard water.

 

In place of plastic, Tan says The Powder Shampoo is packaged in aluminium bottles because each one can be recycled 100 times or more. (Photo: The Powder Shampoo)

 

Packaging was another big concern for the eco-entrepreneur. She chose aluminium because it is durable, light and can be infinitely recycled, unlike plastic, which can only be recycled once.

To reduce the production of aluminium bottles, Tan also offers 100g refill packs of the shampoo, which are packaged in 100 per cent paper; all products are available on the brand’s online store.

 

FEEL GOOD BEAUTY

Having said that, one cannot help but wonder why powder shampoo as a haircare category hasn’t taken off sooner? Tan has a theory. She believes it goes against the grain of how businesses usually run.

“As a big brand, if you create a culture of people buying shampoo every month, why would you suddenly create a product where people buy from you every quarter or only twice a year?” she asked.

Nonetheless, the straight-shooting businesswoman is not afraid to speak out against liquid shampoos even though it remains one of the key products she currently distributes. “Why hasn’t haircare evolved? Why are we still making shampoos the same way as we have in the 50s?” she asked.

Will speaking out alienate the brands she distributes? “It may,” she mused. “Then maybe (the big brands) want to do something about it? My dream is not to be the only one selling powder shampoo, but for everyone to sell it because it makes the most sense. I hope this will create a ripple effect across the globe.”

Another cool bonus for consumers, The Powder Shampoo works with non-profit organisation Tree-Nation. So each time you purchase a bottle, you will get an email notifying you that a tree has been planted in your name in Tanzania, Eastern Africa.

Tan spent her childhood playing at her mother’s plant nursery in Malaysia and is a huge tree lover. “My dream is to plant a million trees by 2030, or in this lifetime. This is my beacon and will be my legacy. It’s important to choose a beacon that you feel deeply for, so you can look towards it when times are tough and you feel lost,” she said.

 

Lynn Tan credits her children (from left) Julian, 6, Kaela, 13, and Reynna, 17, for inspiring her to create The Powder Shampoo; when she has to work weekends, her husband helps with childcare duties. (Photo: The Powder Shampoo)

 

After this launch, Tan will be introducing head-to-toe washes in the third quarter of this year and powder conditioners in the last quarter.

“I spent the first 20 years of my career as an advocate for scalp care, hair care and plant-based products, but I contributed to the plastic problem. I feel everything has come full circle and I will spend the next 20 years trying to address this problem (with powder shampoos),” she said.

CNA Women is a section on CNA Lifestyle that seeks to inform, empower and inspire the modern woman. If you have women-related news, issues and ideas to share with us, email [email protected].

 


 

Source CNA Lifestyle

Green homes in ‘airspace’ proposed to address housing, climate problems

Green homes in ‘airspace’ proposed to address housing, climate problems

Building an apartment block on stilts over a public car park in central Nelson would help provide affordable homes, reduce greenhouse gas emissions and help add “buzz” to the city, proponents say.

Unveiling a plan for 56 “eco” apartments above the open-air council car park in Buxton Square, city councillor Matt Lawrey said the model could help more people live in city centres across New Zealand – reducing the number of people having to drive in to work, and helping keeping cities alive.

The four-storey block would have trees and shrubs planted on its balconies and roof, with only timber columns, lifts, stairs, a toilet block and bike storage touching the ground.

Lawrey approached local architectural designer Pierre Hammond and landscape architect Ursula Bowman to create the design, after being “inspired” by urban regeneration developments in Europe.

 

Nelson City councillor, Matt Lawrey, (centre) architectural designer Pierre Hammond and landscape architect Ursula Bowman in Buxton Square in Nelson, where they propose building eco-apartments above the council-owned car park to help create more affordable homes and a “green corridor” in the city centre.

 

Hammond said the building’s main structure would be made from locally-grown pine, creating a much smaller carbon footprint than concrete and steel.

The one, two or three bedroom units would be built in a grid, allowing for the units to be made bigger or smaller once the block was constructed, reducing the need to build more homes when demand changed, Hammond said.

“Standardised” materials would be used, making the building more cost-effective and faster to build, with much of it able to be built offsite and craned in, minimising disruption, he said.

Bowman said plantings around the apartment block would soften the existing square, helping establish a “green corridor” through the city, tying in with the aim of the city’s spatial plan to create a pedestrian link across the CBD.

Sustainable features like rain gardens (where water flowed in and was treated there, rather than going straight into drains and the sea) would make the square a pleasant place to be, she said.

Hammond said flood modelling showed the square was at the “high point” of the coastal and riverside city, and not prone to flooding from sea level rise in the next 100 years.

He said 6000 people came into central Nelson to work, but only 50 people lived there.

Lawrey said the city missed the buzz, activity and spend that came with having people living in it all the time.

While it was a challenge to build a unit in town for less than $1 million, costs would drop if developers didn’t have to buy the land but could lease it from council – benefiting prospective buyers and renters, and creating a potential revenue stream for council, he said.

 

Buxton Square in central Nelson, where it is proposed an apartment block be built over the footprint of the car park. ANDY MACDONALD/STUFF

 

“If we get more people living in town, then it’s going to be good for businesses, because there will be customers walking around all the time, it’s going to be good for the life of the city, because there will be more happening, and it will be good for the economy.

“Cities are facing a challenge because of the way things are changing with retail, with people working from home. We need to get smarter about how we stimulate our city centres.”

The plan kept the existing car park because people “got concerned about parking” whenever change was proposed in the central city, Lawrey said.

The design allowed for the parking spaces to be changed to retail space if demand for parking fell.

 

This high-rise apartment building in the Italian city of Milan, named Bosco Verticale (Vertical Forest), is planted with around 20,000 trees, shrubs, climbers and perennials, which soak up about 30 tonnes of carbon dioxide a year. BOERI STUDIO

 

While the apartments were aimed at people wishing to live without a car, a car share service could be included.

New Zealand car share company, Mevo, said projects like this were “more viable than ever”.

Tens of thousands of people in Wellington, Auckland and Hamilton accessed Mevo’s vehicles instead of private vehicles, and the company was looking to expand into regional cities, CEO Erik Zydervelt said.

“We need more projects such as this that are big, bold and sometimes even a little scary if we want our homes in New Zealand cities to be truly world-leading.

 

Eco-apartments that can be scaled up or down in size are being proposed for Buxton carpark in central Nelson, in what proponents say could be a blue print for inner city living across New Zealand. PIERRE HAMMOND/SUPPLIED

 

“The best cities in the world work hard to ensure people can live, work and play in their centres. This delivers the best outcomes for their environment, people and economies.”

Lawrey hoped the design would “open people’s minds to what might be possible”.

He, Hammond and Bowman intended to pitch the idea to Nelson City Council in the coming weeks.

 


 

Source Stuff

US transition to electric vehicles would save over 100,000 lives by 2050 – study

US transition to electric vehicles would save over 100,000 lives by 2050 – study

A speedy nationwide transition to electric vehicles powered by renewable energy would save more than 100,000 American lives and $1.2tn in public health costs over the next three decades, according to a new report.

Analysis by the American Lung Association highlights the public health damage caused by the world’s dependence on dirty fossil fuels, and provides a glimpse into a greener, healthier future – should political leaders decide to act.

According to the report, swapping gas vehicles for zero-emission new cars and trucks in the US would lead to 110,000 fewer deaths, 2.8m fewer asthma attacks and avoid 13.4m sick days by 2050.

The shift would lead to a 92% fall in greenhouse gases by 2050, generating $1.7tn in climate benefits by protecting ecosystems, agriculture, infrastructure from rising sea levels and catastrophic weather events including drought and floods.

Overall, communities of color and low-income neighborhoods would reap the biggest benefits from zero-emission technologies as they currently suffer disproportionately from air pollution and climate disasters, the study says.

The calculations are based on transitioning to 100% electric cars sales by 2035 and 100% electric trucks by 2040, as well as ditching dirty fossil fuels for 100% renewable energy sources such as solar, wind, hydroelectric and nuclear by 2035.

However, given political polarization in the US and a lack of political urgency, it seems highly unlikely that oil and gas companies will stop drilling or that American car dealers will be selling only electric cars by 2035.

Joe Biden’s Build Back Better (BBB) legislation, which includes historic funds for climate initiatives, has failed to move through the Senate due to stonewalling by the Republicans and the conservative Democrat Joe Manchin, the fossil-fuel friendly senator from West Virginia.

But the ALA report details the widespread health benefits that could be achieved if political leaders prioritized climate action over corporate profits.

“The current rising gas and energy prices are a symptom of our addiction to fossil fuels. But outside the economic pain, there’s significant public health pain caused by our addiction to fossil fuels. Transitioning to zero-emission technologies and energy depends on strong political leadership and investments, in order to get the potential health benefits off the page and into the real world,” said Will Barrett, author of Zeroing in on Healthy Air.

The scientific evidence is unequivocal. Any further delay in concerted global action to tackle the climate crisis will miss a rapidly closing window to secure a livable future, according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

In the US, transportation and energy are the biggest contributors to greenhouse gases and toxic air.

At least four in 10 Americans – more than 135 million people – live in communities affected by unhealthy levels of air pollution which increase the risk of asthma attacks, strokes, lung cancer, heart attacks, impaired cognitive functioning, premature births and premature death.

The greatest direct health risks are faced by those living close to highways, ports, rail yards, refineries, drilling sites, pipelines and power plants – who are disproportionately communities of color and low-income households. These health burdens are due to decades of inequitable land use policies and systemic racism.

According to the ALA, a shift to zero-emission technologies compared with business as usual would lead to a 78% reduction in Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) – which can cause difficulty breathing, nausea, damage to the central nervous system and cancer. Nitrogen oxides (NOx), which are associated with increased ER visits and hospitalizations with asthma, could fall by 92%. (NOx and VOCs are building blocks for ozone – or smog.)

Fine ​​particle (PM2.5) pollution, which elevates the risk of heart disease, lung cancer and asthma, would drop 61% by 2050.

Every state stands to benefit, with more than half gaining at least $10bn in cumulative public health savings from a range of avoided health impacts like premature deaths, asthma emergencies and sick days. The country’s two most populated states – California and Texas – could save $100bn, while six others – Pennsylvania, Florida, Ohio, New York, Illinois and Michigan – stand to save at least $50bn by 2050. (Hawaii and Alaska were not included.)

The hundred US counties, accounting for about 3% in total, with the highest proportion of people of color could experience about 13% of the cumulative health benefits of the green transport transition.

The impacts of doing nothing are very real.

As a child, Rohan Arora from the Washington DC area would rush to fetch his asthmatic father’s inhaler as he coughed and wheezed, triggered by the air pollution on his journey home from work. “It was almost every day, a hazard of living in a city, and sometimes he needed to go to the hospital. Transitioning to zero emissions and clean renewable energy is urgent,” said Arora, 21.

Heavy-duty vehicles like cargo trucks account for just 6% of the national on-road fleet, but generate 31% of the total greenhouse gases in the transport sector. In short, cars produce more harmful planet-heating gases and air pollutants because there are so many of them on the road, but trucks are by far the more toxic.

BBB legislation earmarks $555bn to tackle the energy and transport sectors through a variety of grants, tax incentives and other policies to boost jobs and technologies, as well as major investments in sustainable vehicles and public transit services.

“Zero-emission transportation is a win-win for public health,” said Harold Wimmer, ALA’s president and CEO.

 


 

Source The Guardian